Sustaining an absolute respect for right to life
Figures provided by the Department of Health in Britain show that 51 Maltese women had an abortion in the UK in 2010 compared to 78 the previous year. Prima facie the data could be seen as an indication that fewer Maltese women are seeking the procedure overseas – abortion in Malta is, of course, illegal. The number is also below the annual average of 57 abortions carried out on Maltese women in England and Wales in the previous 10 years. However, how many other Maltese women may be having abortions in other countries, say, Italy, is anybody’s guess because no statistics are available in such cases.
A crucial question that springs from such a reality is whether the country has the proper structures to identify the dimension of abortions by Maltese women abroad primarily to ensure that all possible facilities are in place, and readily available, to help those facing such moments of truth. The pain, and not just physical, an abortion causes is immeasurable. A living creature dies. The mother and others close to her often live or try to live with souls harbouring guilt, minds in turmoil, normal patterns of behaviour turned upside down. Some will never forgive themselves.
Abortion wreaks havoc. Many studies show that it is a destructive force, especially for women, who are often left alone to bear the deep sorrow and regret that follow the decision to destroy the life of an unborn child.
Research conducted by Paul C. Vitz, professor emeritus of psychology at New York University and senior scholar at the Institute for Psychological Sciences, concludes that “though a woman can decide rationally to have an abortion... a terrible and shocking reaction sets in after their abortion”. He argues that, often, what lasts is not the relief or the power of the logical arguments; these may prove very short-lived. “It is, rather, the failed, betrayed relationship between the woman and her foetus – now, in her mind, her dead baby – that has staying power.”
The dimension of any praiseworthy campaign for the mobilisation of pro-life values should therefore go beyond promoting full legal protection for the unborn. It should also include the best possible coordinated efforts to educate people about why abortion is not right and what terrible effects it could have while also offering proficient counselling, encouragement and help to women and families in difficult situations.
Appoġġ offers a service (helpline 179) to women experiencing crises resulting from their pregnancy. Yet, maybe it is time to consider having a counselling centre for pregnant women, also offering goal-directed advice to save unborn babies that may be at risk of being aborted and to support women in difficult living situations with all the means available. Indeed, the quality of such counselling must take very seriously both the value of unborn life and the difficulties of the pregnant woman.
Unconditional respect for the right to life of every innocent person, from conception to natural death, is one of the pillars on which every civil society stands. A caring state recognises the defence of the fundamental rights of the human person, especially of the weakest, as its primary duty. It, therefore, never stops seeking to invest in valid efforts aimed at identifying and combating considerations that may lead to abortion, at defending life and at promoting the reconciliation and healing of those harmed by the tragedy of abortion. Just one abortion is one too many and the 51 we know about may be just a sample.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
P. Vincenti
Jun 29th 2011, 20:44
Mr Casha,
Your are being alarmist and unjust. Women deserve better.
Gerry Cowie
Jun 29th 2011, 20:03
Well, not surprisingly we see comment aimed at Gift of Life which of course expects such comments from secularist and humanist quarters. Anybody standing up for life nowadays is assured plenty of comment against them and no doubt they are used to it!
The trap many fall into is that the right to life itself is a religious aberration! It patently is not so. Everybody commenting in this column is able to do so because their own parents chose life.
Stand by for all the extreme examples, freedom of the individual and it's the 21st century!
The very disingenuous allusion to the fact that birth itself is dangerous is nonsensical in this argument. Every woman knows there are risks involved in pregnancy and birth by whatever method used. This cannot be equated with abortion itself which is the deliberate killing of an unborn child. It is illegal to kill a born child yet quite legal in most countries to kill an unborn one. The presence of the womb is all that keeps an innocent baby from being suctioned away in pieces. There is no reason why any educational effort should fail. Of course if such educational efforts do not suit the secularist and humanist agendae then they will be deemed useless anyway.
This editorial is most welcome if somewhat overdue. Well done to all those people who support human life from conception until natural death.
I do not judge those who think differently - I just feel sorry for them and hope that they have a change of heart.
Andy Farrugia
Jun 29th 2011, 14:57
Good to hear that this paper supports life; unlike the regular diatribes by assorted humanists and nihilists on other e-papers which try to justify the slaughter of the innocent.
Ramon Casha
Jun 29th 2011, 09:42
It is almost certain that the figure represents only a percentage of abortions carried out abroad. One of the problems about having a "counselling centre" for women who might be considering abortion is that it could easily serve to identify those women in order to keep them under surveillance, with alarm bells going off if they should attempt to leave the country. I can easily see one or two MPs requesting that the police take action to ensure that women using this facility are not allowed to leave the country unless they prove they're not pregnant. I don't think these women would want to place themselves at risk.
Any educational effort will fail if it sounds like one of the regular sermons from Gift of Life. However if it IS unbiased, then it must show that, just as there are stories where a woman regretted having an abortion, there are also women who feel it was the best choice, and who don't regret it at all. It will have to show the difference, to the women involved, between a "morning-after pill" and an abortion carried out in the later part of pregnancy. It will have to point out that, while abortion carries some medical risks, childbirth does too, as does a c-section procedure.
Joseph Camilleri
Jun 30th 2011, 11:24
Yes, I happen to agree with you on this one. You are not being alarmist; quite the contrary, what you say is factual. But note that it's men, in general, whom you find in the forefront of this imaginary battle to overcome this veritable scourge.
There are two ways to reduce the number of abortions: education and contraception. Contraception must be on the agenda for young girls from a very early age. At the end of the day, the girl is responsible, generally, for a pregnancy. And girls must realise this and be careful. If they cannot stay away from sex, contraception is the answer.
Please choose the reason of your report below: