Not a case of ‘winner takes all’ (3)

The Nationalist Party should have campaigned for a Yes vote in the divorce referendum, as both married or separated have families, unless they see separated couples as second-class families. Perhaps that is why the party came out for a No vote, so as...

The Nationalist Party should have campaigned for a Yes vote in the divorce referendum, as both married or separated have families, unless they see separated couples as second-class families. Perhaps that is why the party came out for a No vote, so as to keep it that way…

Some MPs are now saying they would be voting against or abstaining when the divorce Bill comes to a vote in Parliament, because they want to represent the minority who voted No.

May I remind them that those who voted Yes are now the minority.

They should stop playing with words and admit that divorce is a civil right.

Nobody gets married in order to obtain a divorce, but it seems that the Church allows marriages to be annulled. And what about conscience?

Did everyone not vote according to their conscience in thereferendum?

Some MPs are now invoking conscience to go against the will of the people, who have voted in conscience for divorce.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.