Breakwater bridge being fabricated in Spain
The proposed new single-span bridge.
The steel bridge which will link Fort St Elmo to one of the Grand Harbour breakwater arms is currently being fabricated in Spain and will be delivered later this year, Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt has announced.
The bridge will be delivered practically ready to be put in place.
The project was unveiled in 2009, when Dr Gatt said it was projected to cost €2.8 million. It was originally meant to be completed late last year.
The project is being financed by Transport Malta.
The original bridge, partly demolished in an Italian e-boat attack in 1941 and subsequently removed, had consisted of two spans resting on central pillars, which are still standing.
Although the government's plan was to reconstruct a replica of the Victorian bridge, the proposal was found to require a lot of steel and was not deemed cost-effective. As a result, a simpler design was drawn up, incorporating a steel arch, a timber deck and an observation area.
The tender conditions specified that the bridge must have a lifespan of 120 years. 12 bids were submitted for the project
The steel bridge is one of the government's projects for the regeneration of Grand Harbour, which also includes the panoramic lift linking Lascaris Wharf to Upper Barrakka, and the removal of the tank-cleaning facility.
97 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Johann Cuschieri
Jun 23rd 2011, 10:16
It would have been better to spend the money for a new yacht marina as it clearly generates cash for the government.. Now with this bridge yacht users will have to use the G.H. main entrance causing delays and traffic.
Tom TT
Jun 22nd 2011, 22:05
How Interesting! I believe that in the late 60's begining 70's the USA investigated, quoted & proposed to put a bridge from where Tigne point is today across to Valletta, for Valletta residence to commute and business trucks and vans offering service to do the same, to reduce traffic consumption from the Peta side. perhaps journislists should do some research there, Im sure you will find in your archives. Perhaps the breakwater arms is not the place for it! I hope this has nothing to do with the large yachts that enter
Mr Joe Morana
Jun 22nd 2011, 18:49
""The project was unveiled in 2009, when Dr Gatt said it was projected to cost €2.8 million. It was originally meant to be completed late last year."
€2.8 million for a bridge leading to nowhere....!!!
What a waste of taxpayers' money, when our other more important historical, architectural and artistic jewels such as the historic church dedicated to Our Lady of Victory in Valletta, desperately needs timely restoration. Shame!!
Michael Magri
Jun 22nd 2011, 13:52
"..Although the government's plan was to reconstruct a replica of the Victorian bridge, the proposal was found to require a lot of steel and was not deemed cost-effective. As a result, a simpler design was drawn up, incorporating a steel arch, a timber deck and an observation area..."
Insomma... Fi kliem iehor, xi haga mqazha u ta kaf kaf gejja mela bhal mhu se tigi dik tas-suppost tejatru, BLA SAQAF.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!! X`Buzullotti u X`Buzullotti........!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Albert Bezzina
Jun 21st 2011, 23:26
"The project is being financed by Transport Malta."
Correction: the bridge is being financed by the gluttony of annual circulation fees and registration taxes ripped off owners of passenger cars.
There are other places I would put this bridge, but it's painful.
Alfred Falzon
Jun 21st 2011, 21:47
What has partisan politics to do with the rebuilding of a steel bridge linking Fort St Elmo to the left arm of the Grand Harbour breakwater?
Some of my countrymen tend to translate everything into banal politics for the simple reason that they might have an axe to grind with the Party in power!
When are we going to grow up and learn to call a spade a spade?!
In my opinion, it is a commendable effort on the part of our Government in its attempt to restore our capital to its pristine glory.
Some may say, "yes indeed, but the money could have been spent otherwise!"
Yes, but...
Let's be frank, is it just sour grapes or a nostalgia for the "good old days" when some of our armchair critics happened to share the reins of power on the other side of the fence?
Such projects are as praiseworthy as the ingenious restoration of the former Knights' Sacra Infermeria, and all Maltese worthy of their salt should be proud to see their Island Nation forging ahead!
Manuel Briffa
Jun 22nd 2011, 17:19
Hear! Hear
Adrian Said
Jun 21st 2011, 21:45
these 2.8 million could have been easily spent on the Marsalforn breakwater. It would have been much more useful I guess!
Mr Charlie Grech
Jun 21st 2011, 20:27
The bridge couldn't have been made here in Malta? Are the Maltese not skilled enough to do it?
angelo cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 21:20
We could have built it out of granite stone for much less than 2.8 million, we have the know how and the skill in stone masonry and it would have been much better to withstand the elements as even the finest Toledo steel corrodes in the salty air of a pounding sea storm.
Elena Attard
Jun 21st 2011, 23:51
Probably not. Why so surprised?
karen chircop
Jun 22nd 2011, 00:26
Yes we do have the skill to make this bridge here in MALTA!My husband is an engineer and he could have made it for a fraction of the cost!Just a disgrace as usual.
Mr Joe Gatt
Jun 23rd 2011, 09:32
Elena Attard
Are you aware that the Gozo Channel Ferry Boats were built locally? Apart from many other projects, so you may doubt or think that we cannot build a small, unecessary, small yet expensive Bridge from nowhere to nowhere?
Hopefully, this does not translate to the low self esteem of some individuals?
U forsi xi `Cuc` Malti
Mr john vella
Jun 21st 2011, 19:44
This bridge was damaged during the war.
Would it be much to ask if these 2.8 million euro that this government saw fit to add to our national deficit if he had the decency to ask those that blew it to cover, or part pay for its restructure?
How long are we going to continue showing off when we have areas that need basic necessity the like of drainage connection or decent roads for all, to mention two for a start.
Please let us put our needs to order after all we all receive the same tax rates to pay.
Walter Joseph Attard
Jun 21st 2011, 19:39
What if we were given a bonus to compensate the cost of living! ITS CHEAPER THAN A REFERENDUM !!!
Mr Victor Calleja
Jun 21st 2011, 19:21
Issa se jsemmuh il "Il Ponte Vecchio". Wara kollox bhal gvern.
angelo cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 18:50
Made of the finest Toledo steel.
George Debono
Jun 21st 2011, 18:10
WHAT A WASTE OF TAXPAYERS MONEY !
Alfred Grech
Jun 21st 2011, 17:54
Waste of money on a useless bridge. It would have been better if they built an underground multi level parking somewhere where it's badly needed.
Mr Anthony Borg
Jun 21st 2011, 17:43
I will never forgive this PN legislature for the way it handled Valletta City & the Opera House project.
But if I am to be honest, regarding the rebuilding of the Breakwater bridge, at least it is being repaired, after 66 years of abandonment.
It will be visually appealing to people of my own age and having lived in Valletta all my youthful years.
Looking foreward to seeing it in place.
Victor Pulis
Jun 21st 2011, 17:30
Andre Cilia
Today, 16:15
@Victor Pulis
Maybe for the same reason you whine about anything that is done all day long on these comments. Grow up and look beyond the first expense, see what benefits such an expense will create before babbling out stuff which only degrade your own image.
But don't you think that your comment re the bridge being a tourist attraction(!) was a bit, shall we say absurd? have you never seen a real bridge? i mentioned just two. If Malta is famous for something it's certainly not bridges. We are famous for instance for our fortifications like fort St. Angelo just a few metres from the prospective bridge and fort St. Elmo touching the prospective 'tourist attraction' It's all a matter of priorities. But what would you know of such things?
Andre Cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 19:33
It isn't for the bridge, it is part of history just like St. Angelo and St. Elmo...
Victor Pulis
Jun 21st 2011, 19:54
It is not part of history. It's a totally new bridge. And even if it was the exact copy of the old bridge it still wouldn't be historical. Besides, there are other more important projects on which to spend 2.8 million euro. That's what I mean by priorities.
angelo cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 21:04
Andre has a valid point, too bad the Royal Opera house was not rebuilt to its 1866 EM Barry glory instead of that Renzo Piano cables and poles open tennis court mess we are going to pay for.
Mr Tony Micallef
Jun 21st 2011, 16:27
Osservazzjoni zghira: L-uzu tal- Malti ma jonqosx.... lanqas fuq l-Internet. PROSIT. J'Alla jikber l-uzu tieghu.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 16:08
U ma tistax tmur hemm għax jiġu s-suldati u ma jħallukx minħabba sigurtà.
U dan wara li qerdu t-Tarzna li setgħet tibni dan il-pont!
Mhux ta' b'xejn li kien hemm min qal li l-PN huwa Partit SAĦTA ta' Malta.
U ma kien il-Labour tafux.
Alistair Busuttil
Jun 21st 2011, 15:51
mela ha ngorr jien ukoll,barra li l-bridege ma tasal imkien ,dik l-area hi imwarba u ftit li xejn jinzlu nies hemm
Manuel Briffa
Jun 21st 2011, 16:40
Alistair, thabbilx rasek, issa forsi jarmaw xi erbgha gabbani bil-burgers u chips u tara kemm jibdew jinzlu nies hemmekk jaraw il bridge. Apparti hekk, xi nghidu ghal dawk il-cruise liners kollha li jghaddu min hemm kuljum u jaraw dak it-tifrik. Jghidulek f'sittin sena qas bicca bridge ma kienu kapaci jsewwu dawn?
guido cutajar
Jun 21st 2011, 19:45
@ Manuel Briffa..........I believe that when I am spending money ( especially somebody else money ) I have to make sure that I will have a good return ` financially `. otherwise I will be wasting their money, (at this case the citizens money.) You that do not gemgem, can you please tell me what are we getting back from building again the bridge ? If you read my comment below,you will understand what I mean. Now if your intentions are to earn some money yourself by taking the Gabbani of bergers contracts....that is another thing. Kullhadd bravu jahli u jonfoq flus haddiehor bhal ma qeghed jghamel dan il gvern. Meta lil tal " Cruse Liners " nghejdulhom li dak il pont waqqawulna it Taljani, ghax kienu jobdu lil Germanizi, u tort kien ta l-Inglizi, ghax thalna fil gwerra habba fihom. Dawn huma il maggoranza tat turisti li jigu, u zgur li ma jiehdux pjacir.
Manuel Briffa
Jun 21st 2011, 15:28
Mamma mia...ingorru biss nafu...vera Maltese gemgem!
Mr John Baldacchino
Jun 21st 2011, 15:55
You must look up the meaning of the word ‘DEMOCRACY’. By the way, times of Malta should remove the comment feature then! constructive comments should be here and not silenced so please let them speak out what they think and everyone should be left free to make up his mind.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 16:10
Mr John Baldacchino For Manwel Briffa Democracy is spelled either "The Mockracy" or DeMOCKracy".
your choice.
Manuel Briffa
Jun 21st 2011, 16:48
Mr Baldacchino, I hope you agree that I too am entitled to speak my mind without being ostracised
Stefan Zammit
Jun 21st 2011, 18:33
@Tony Camilleri: Seeing you are familiar with democracy, then you should know that whoever is in government has the responsibility to spend the tax payer's money the way they see most fit, irrelevant of your or my opinion at times.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 23:35
You are WRONG Stefan Zammit
Whoever is in government is obliged and must spend the money as a Bonus Pater Familias, a Good Father of the Family.
What your Gonezi is doing is squanderign our taxes like all PN governments always did.
Jesmond Micallef
Jun 21st 2011, 15:26
Whilst complimenting the works being done here but cannot help wonder about the condition of the Breakwater structure below the waterline !! Are such inspections done on a regular basis ? I somewhat doubt it !!
Jesmond Micallef
Jun 21st 2011, 16:49
I'm sorry if my comment was seen to be negative. Still, I would recommend that the Breakwater structure below the waterline be inspected on a regular basis. That way, true and current knowledge of it's condition is known and followed through with repairs if necessary. The structure does get a hefty pounding by the waves afterall. If these inspections are being undertaken, then by all means ignore this.
Once again, well done for the bridge reconstruction.
Henry S. Pace
Jun 21st 2011, 15:20
Well done Hon Gatt.
Though this should have been financed by the British Government after the end of the War.
Mr John Bonnici
Jun 21st 2011, 15:44
Yes so as to the reconstruction of the Royal theatre. Which had been destroyed by the axis, and as such the British government received war damage funds!! Mr Cameron we deserve more than a thank you!!!
Mr James Farrugia
Jun 21st 2011, 15:49
More like by the Italian Govt for blowing it up in the first place.
Hon Gatt!!! you must be kidding, blinded blue i guess.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 16:11
Henry S. Pace, Mr John Bonnici, agree with you
Mr W Cassar
Jun 21st 2011, 16:44
@ Mr John Bonnici
Actually funds were given to Malta for the Opera House, if you dont know your history don't comment. Please
Mr John Said
Jun 21st 2011, 15:19
understanding or enjoying certain things requires some form of inteligence or education, unfortunatly in Malta we have a lot of people who donot have this. Like when you are looking at a painting, some people just think its a painting, orthers realise that its art; for some people going for a good meal means eating till you feel your stomach can take no more, others prefer a small tasty meal.
Its all a matter of knowlege. looking forward to see an other step in making the grand harbour, our grand harbour even more GRAND!!!!!!!!!!!
guido cutajar
Jun 21st 2011, 15:09
Flus fil hela.............When I was young, we use to swim to go on this " breakwater ". We use to go inside it, and there is nothing to see, just darkness. During the war there was an iron cable holding an iron net, between the breakwater, the Rinella breakwater and the place further in ( Valletta ) were we use to call " fuq iz ziemel "or " fuq iz zonqra ". The net was to close the harbor . By that time the bridge was needed, because people use to go inside the breakwater to maintain the cains / cables, which hold the " Iron Net ".. Today it is not worthy to go on the breakwater. If there will be no railings, it is going to be very dangerous, especially concerning children. Nobody can swim, because the rough sea. In winter forget about going on the breakwater, because you find yourself at the menqa in Marsa within 5 seconds. The bridge has to be very strong, because the first " grigalata " will swipe it. I believe that again, we are wasting money.
H. Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 15:04
I really don't see the point of having the bridge back to life..... since stepping on the break-water is illegal and anyone who has to go on it, needs a permit from the concerned authorities.
Would prefare the millions of €uros being spent on it, to be used to rehabilitate the area known is 'Il-Fossa' in Valletta, below Baviera... which is frequented by hundreds of tourists and diving fans.
Mr John Borg
Jun 21st 2011, 15:03
Fine, you want to spend €2.3 out of my taxes but at least make fabrication in-house. Let the Maltese do it, create more jobs and make the national wheel go round. Why do we always have to involve foreigners?
Mr Matthew Galea
Jun 21st 2011, 15:26
ax awn malta mawnx welders, fhimt? dawk li kienu jahdmu welders it-tarzna u ship building, mumiex kapaci jahdmu bridge... -_-'
imbad ax awn in-nies qgheda...
Mr edward ciantar
Jun 21st 2011, 15:03
oh.....it will make a nice catwalk! :)
Joseph Barbara
Jun 21st 2011, 14:57
Agree. 2.8 million wasted on a bridge to nowhere.
Ms Monica Muscat
Jun 21st 2011, 14:49
Some say it is useless. Others that it leads to nowhere. Again others complain because it is of steel! How can it be that all Government Projects are either, useless, too expensive, unappealing and a thousand other things?!!! One thing I would like to say. I might not like the steel structure, but I shall surely enjoy the view and leisurely walk over the bridge... to somewhere!
Mr James Farrugia
Jun 21st 2011, 15:51
I guess it will be ready for the current govt to walk across and keep walking and walking and if possible take the persons wearing their blue blinkers with them.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 16:13
Ms Monica Muscat because the people are not blinded by the PN propaganda.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 16:14
Good idea.
Gonzi walking the plank as they used to do in the good old pirate days.
j brincat
Jun 21st 2011, 14:45
This country had always had its priorities wrong. Where will this steel bridge lead? Oh from St Elmo to one of the breakwaters. OMG!
What about finding a solution to the grave traffic congestion at Marsa - the only artery of the South?
Where are the MPs (from both sides) from this part of the Island?
Is there an invisible line which separates the North from the South?
Are the Southerns too meek or afraid to speak out?
Who would have imagined that we have a PM who lives in the South - does he turn a blind eye when he is caught in a traffic jam (though he is invariably accompanied by wailing sirens to give way wherever he goes).
(jb)
(jb)
Jay Aquilina
Jun 21st 2011, 15:14
ghadek ma rajt xejn il marsa, zomm ftit iehor u tara xi traffic enormi sakemm tinqala u titlesta triq aldo moro.
Ray Gatt
Jun 21st 2011, 15:52
@ J Brincat - Most of the traffic congestion at Marsa is caused by the ignorant driving and lack of knowledge of rules we have on our island. How many of the drivers choose and keep their lane depending on their destination. One sees vehicles on the airport lane when their destination is Cottonera. Then they have to cross two or three lanes at the last seconds, thus driving horizontally across other vehicles. The opposite happens with vehicles wanting to go to the airport.
@ J Aquilina - allura tissugerixxi li triq Aldo Mora m'ghandiex issir? Jekk ma jsir xejn tgorru ghax ma sar xejn u jekk isir xorta tgorru. Maltese gemgem fuq kollox hazin u tajjeb.
Mr Tony Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 16:16
Ray Gatt dawk kollha proġetti li m'hemmx bżonnhom imma se jsiru biss biex Gonzi joqgħod jiftaħar x'għamel bi flusna u jkompli jdaħħalna f'iktar dejn.
j brincat
Jun 21st 2011, 16:27
@Ray Gatt
So you blame all on the ignorance of motorists.
Oh come off it and be serious!
(jb)
Alfred Farrugia
Jun 21st 2011, 14:43
If the original bridge was demolished by the Italians, why has the government not asked the Italians to make a replica and pay for it? Since Transport Malta is financing the project, has Palumbo submitted a tender?
The projected cost was 2.8 million euro. Can we know what is going to be the actual cost, and why it is a year late?
Bernard Mamo
Jun 21st 2011, 14:30
Bridge to nowhere, u l-bridge fuq il bypass ta l-imriehel rawh wisq expensive. u leee...
Charles Micallef
Jun 21st 2011, 15:17
The difference is, that the bridge at Imriehel saves lives and the one in the grand harbour give people a panaromic view, and now we know which is more important for this Mal-administration!
James Catania
Jun 21st 2011, 14:26
"Although the government's plan was to reconstruct a replica of the Victorian bridge, the proposal was found to require a lot of steel and was not deemed cost-effective. As a result, a simpler design was drawn up, incorporating a steel arch, a timber deck and an observation area"
Mela, we reconstruct a bridge which serves no real purpose except for aesthetic, BUT we don't stay true to history (cause it would be too expensive) - mela ma noffardjawhx imma láqwa li naghmluh, halli, naghmluh hazin.
And with €2.8Million, Transport Malta, could have done ??.....
Keith Balzan
Jun 21st 2011, 14:21
2.8million for a bridge which is useless...how about 2.8 million to arrange the roads or something which will make our life more easier!
Ian Bugeja
Jun 21st 2011, 14:20
@Mr Gordon
Boiler Nr 7 is being upgraded by BWSC
and regarding the other points well we need to protect and restore our cultural heritage!!! and this bridge forms part of it.
Victor Pulis
Jun 21st 2011, 14:35
The bridge being built has got nothing to do with our cultural heritage even if it was being built to the original bridge's specifications (which it is not) This bridge to nowhere is a waste of money and should have been way down there in the government's priorities after more important projects.
Mr daniel Gordon
Jun 21st 2011, 16:16
@Ian Bugeja: Thanks for the info about Boiler Nr.7.
My suggestion was more tongue-in-cheek than for real.
Re.The heritage side of the argument: There are so many other projects, which in my opinion should take priority over this bridge. This will be a millisecond view for some cruise ship visitors, and hardly a defining point of Malta's 7 thousand year history.
Thanks you for your comment.
Mr Adrian Borg Cardona
Jun 21st 2011, 17:42
Protect and restore our culturak heritage!!! Yiou must be joking. This Govt is turning Valletta slowly slowly into a shmables of a 'modern' city, destroying its character in the process. Need I mention City Gate, the open-air function place and the new Parliament. This bridge has nothing to do with our culture or heritage. It is not even a replica of the original bridge. we are just reinventing the City.
Mr Joseph N. Attard
Jun 21st 2011, 14:15
The silliest possible way to use 2.8 million euro (probably much more) of taxpayer's money. How about upgrading some of our 1941 roads?
Sandro Privitera
Jun 21st 2011, 13:54
Dr. Gatt,
As I paid for the bridge out of my tax contributions, would I be allowed to use it?
SP
Mr Joe Micallef
Jun 21st 2011, 13:49
What a sorry person you are!
Mr Joe Gatt
Jun 21st 2011, 13:43
How many Solar Panels would have been installed and what would be the wattage totally produced in green electrical energy, with Euro 2.8 Million.
A Bridge to nowhere.
Another White Elephant. just another totally Crazy idea.
Victor Pulis
Jun 21st 2011, 13:42
I just hope the timber deck is being built of sturdy material as I envisage thousands of people wanting to stoll along the breakwater arm especially during a Grigalata!!
Anthony Busuttil
Jun 21st 2011, 13:42
the bridge leading to no where.................................... you cannot even walk on the breakwater. Fabricated in Spain, I am sure that with the ressation there is in Spain now it is costing much less. Fabrication how to spend money.
Jon Fenech
Jun 21st 2011, 13:35
Mhux ahjar qabbadni t-Taljani la waqqawh huma lol....
Mr daniel Gordon
Jun 21st 2011, 13:33
And another thing:
Why did it have to be built in Spain?
Is there no company in Malta capable of fabricating a steel structure?
I reckon that the ship yards could build this for the same price, and then it would be here and not need to be transported half way across Europe. Obviously giving employment to Maltese worker is not on Transport Malta's agenda.
Mr Peter Korsten
Jun 21st 2011, 14:52
"Why did it have to be built in Spain?
Is there no company in Malta capable of fabricating a steel structure?"
These things go via a public tender, and the information is readily available, so you could probably answer your own questions.
Mr charles azzopardi
Jun 21st 2011, 13:29
Is the bridge coming over ready with fishing rod rests ? Is booking open for the fishing posts allotment ?
Well .. what a pity seeing a steel bridge made in Spain when the dockyard in the harbour has been closed down ... are we sure we could not use the dockyard and shipbuilding profitably or did the tit for tat between union and government lead to the closure .. ?
Mr daniel Gordon
Jun 21st 2011, 13:26
Quote- "The project is being financed by Transport Malta."
errr, no, this is being financed by our tax contributions. No one asked me if I wanted this bridge, or even if I think its necessary.
I for one, would rather see the €2.8 million tax cost being spent on something worthwhile to the whole of the country, and not just to the anglers who wish to fish off the mole. (Nothing against anglers !!)
How about a €2.8 million upgrade of Boiler Nr.7?
Or a €2.8 million upgrade of bridge/tunnel safety measures?
Or a equally shared €2.8 million Tax rebate for the 162,000 working folk? (Politicians not included-you know why).
Or spend €2.8 million on teaching about road safety/animal protection/environmental issues.
Or.......you tell me.
Andre Cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 13:53
Or spend 2.8million to teach know it all nitwits that such projects are needed to attract tourists which in turn will pay more than the 2.8million spent (over the 120 year period), which money will be earned by the hotels/restaurants/shops which in turn increase tax revenues which can be spent on other projects/tax rebates/bridge/tunnel safety measures/boiler no.7
Robert Attard
Jun 21st 2011, 13:54
99.9999999% us anglers won't even be allowed to go fish on it.........
Mr David Buttigieg
Jun 21st 2011, 14:09
"errr, no, this is being financed by our tax contributions. No one asked me if I wanted this bridge, or even if I think its necessary. "
It's called democracy, Mr Gordon, you should look it up. People are elected to the executive and these decisions are up to them while in office and they are under no obligation to consult you.
If you disagree with the decisions you have a tool at your disposal to show it every 5 years or so.
You can even try to get yourself elected so you can take the decisions yourself!
Jonathan Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 14:09
How about taking care of our heritage Mr Gordon.
boiler no7 doesn't need to be upgrade because it'll be closed down once the delimara extension is running. At least we take care and restore our patrimony and not let it degrade as time goes by and no one does anything about it just because they believe money should be spent elsewhere.
S. Portelli
Jun 21st 2011, 14:13
2.8 million on making one of, if not, the nicest harbors in the Mediterranean look even better !!
Kulhadd jeqred f'dal pajjiz xi dwejjaq ta poplu !
Mr Mario Borg
Jun 21st 2011, 14:26
Yes, that's right. Let's all have a good old whinge about this too.
Victor Pulis
Jun 21st 2011, 14:40
Or spend 2.8million to teach know it all nitwits that such projects are needed to attract tourists....!
Sorry but are we talking about the breakwater bridge or Sidney harbour bridge? Or could it be San Francisco bridge?!
And why would tourists fall over each other to take the trip down to the bridge and walk all the way along the break water? Oh I know, they are dying to have a closer look at the... open sea!
Mr Peter Korsten
Jun 21st 2011, 14:49
"Or.......you tell me."
Another referendum... contribution for the Gozo tunnel... financing the wages for the Gozo regional council... cost overruns of all the projects going on... the extra costs of the Bisazza Street mess-up... no shortage of ideas.
Mr daniel Gordon
Jun 21st 2011, 16:05
@Andre Cilia: See comment of Victor Pulis.
@Mr David Buttigieg: Do you honestly believe that this project was put through in any type of democratic decision making way? Those MPs who dont even turn up to do their job (excluding Censu Galea and a few others) wouldn't even know that this bridge was being built!
And voting to stop a project 5 years down the line AFTER its in place isn't going to work now is it?
Democracy is also a tool that lets us complain and communicate through this media. Freedom of speech.
@Jonathan Camilleri: Yes I agree that Heritage is a very important issue that must be kept at the top of the list. I do not agree that this project should take priority when there are so many other things to be fixed. Its a bridge to nowhere. For no one. For no reason.
@S. Portelli: You think putting up a steel girder bridge will make Grand harbour look better? The shame is that people in this country dont protest enough. Thats why we get things forced upon us all the time.
@Mr Mario Borg: See above.
@All: Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Andre Cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 16:15
@Victor Pulis
Maybe for the same reason you whine about anything that is done all day long on these comments. Grow up and look beyond the first expense, see what benefits such an expense will create before babbling out stuff which only degrade your own image.
Andre Cilia
Jun 21st 2011, 16:51
@ Daniel Gordon
You seem to protest enough... on these comments here. You could have organised a group against it (and you would have found quite a number of moaners mind you) and made your opposition more vocal. No one stopped you...
But obviously... just commenting on the Times is much easier...
Mr Mario P. Sciberras
Jun 21st 2011, 13:22
Money no problem. Eur 2.80 million. for what???
Mr M Farrugia
Jun 21st 2011, 14:29
il-lokali seghtaw ikkowtaw ghalih ukoll kieku xtaqu habib,
Mr Lawrence Fenech
Jun 21st 2011, 13:11
Ergajna bil-barranin, bnejna salt vapuri anke t'Ghawdex u ghal bicca bridge ergajna morna barra.
Victor Vella
Jun 21st 2011, 13:16
Xtipretendi li inhalsu id doppju biex inkunu bnejnieh Malta?Mur oqghod b ilsienkhom kieku dwar il favuri u in neputizmu.imma kif xejn ma jogobkhom.
Ivan Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 13:21
Lawrence,
Kien hemm 12-il tender, u nemmen li kien hemm kumpaniji maltin jippartecipaw. Jista jkun li ta' barra kienu irhas?
Mr Steve Cassar
Jun 21st 2011, 13:27
Lawrence Fenech - Xtipretendi li kollox isir malta? Kieku riedu kumpanijji maltin setaw jitfaw tender biex isir!
Avolja cert li xorta kont tgerger wara ghax tghid li x-xol sar hazin u intefqu hafna flus ghalxejn etc etc ...
Tghallem apprezza li qed isir xi haga mhux dejjem irridu ngergru fuq kollox u fuq kulhadd!
Possibli ma ahniex kapaci naraw xi haga tajba fdal-pajjiz? Negattiv biss naraw f'ghajnejna?
Joseph J Camilleri
Jun 21st 2011, 13:48
Naqbel ma' Victor Vella. Nispera li tal-PL ma jghidux li kien hemm il-korruzzjoni f-dan il-progett.
Mr charles vella
Jun 21st 2011, 14:29
many see it, we just decide to remain silent... Our country is becoming more beatiful everyday...! At least our taxes are being used to have a beatiful modern country for my kids to grow up and live in! ...heh, milux smajt 'tigne point m'ghandiex bzonnu ahna zaghar wisq ghal dan l'infieq' ...mela sewwa meta ma kellniex kienu jighdu 'ara malta vera m'ghanda xejn' u ghax issa ghanda, XORTA JGERGRU!!??? maaaa x niess!!