Advert

THE PARTY ASPIRING

Labour was declared to be the party for the middle class by one of its bright young things more than a year ago, which led to quite a few mild raspberries being directed in her direction, given that Labour used to be the party that blew its collective nose towards the middle class, back in the days of the soldiers of steel.

But needs must, and since it's the middle class that decides who gets to run this country every five years or so, it's hardly surprising that Labour has been trying to appeal to the aspirational classes (i.e. the ones that perceive themselves, rightly or wrongly, to be below the middle class)

Truth be told, we're all middle class, really, because the country has homogenised and morphed, pretty much. We don't, shock-horror so-called journalism apart, have an underclass to speak of, just as we don't have a cadre of top dogs who lord it over the rest of us and much as it pains me to admit it, I'm as middle-class as the next bloke.

What, you may ask, has brought on this philosophical disquisition into the motives behind Labour's image-tweaking?

Well, it's not the way they seem to try to appeal to each and every current of thought and reaction that manifests itself, not completely, anyway. We've become used to a Labour spokesperson or other leaping with glee onto every bandwagon that trundles by, whether it's anti-immigrant, pro-hunting, anti-City Gate, pro-apple pie and mom or whatever: if there's a vote there, Labour will be after it.

No, what brought this particular piece of whimsy on was a chance remark in an online exchange I was having, about how the current Leader of the Opposition seems to be messing around with his follicles, seeking to have them filled out a bit and looking all youthful-like, and it occurred to me that, follically-challenged as I am, Labour should really be the party for me.

After all, the writing was on the wall in this area even from the tenure of the previous head-honcho down Mile End way.

Advert

14 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

A. Tabone

Jun 18th 2011, 13:01

That bar is at Tal-Hniena, in Hal Gwann/Bir id-Deheb. Ir-Rahal ta' Fuq is too broadly defined a term to be used for directions.

Although I cannot understand why you haven't grown out of those silly *sics* of yours, I urge you to keep these parables of yours coming; your attempts to understand us Southerners are rather entertaining... self-absorbing, but entertaining. On one side you have ABC saying we're all middle class, and on the other there's you and your petty divisiveness. Not much more to add.

Ivan Grech Mintoff

Jun 18th 2011, 18:17

@ AT

If Ir-Rahal ta Fuq is too broadly defined then so it calling this PN apologistic writing a blog.

Hence the (Sic!) after the Blog.

;)

PS I mentioned ir "rahal ta fuq" as ironically I came across another bar called Tiko Tiko this time in Qawra & did not want to mix the two together.

Besides it is at the one in Zejtun where one finds the inimitable and wise Indri... who once had us in stitches as he kept insisting that Guido DM was 'tal-life' as he just had one ear pierced. Needless to say come the 8pm News, all eyes were glued on the TV and heads twisted round and round to get a better view as Guido spoke on...

:)

Mr Victor Laiviera

Jun 17th 2011, 19:44

When I was at school, we had a teacher like that - every time we pointed out an error on the blackboard, he would say "I was wondering who would be first to spot my deliberate mistake ....".

Andrew Borg-Cardona

Jun 17th 2011, 22:36

Except that mine is no error...

Mr Victor Laiviera

Jun 18th 2011, 08:53



Your error lies in trying to mock and ridicule the people who comment here.

Mr Andy Farrugia

Jun 17th 2011, 20:56

And one assumes that you are chock full of subject and predicate, theme and rheme, object, adverbial and complement; in short full of substance. It is indeed hilarious the way you go about quixotically trying to stifle the objects of your disdain; you must be suffering from various allergies.

Advert
Advert