Government cautious on lawyers’ presence during interrogation
The government is adopting a cautious approach to the European Commission’s proposal granting suspects across the 27 member states the right to have a lawyer present during police interrogation.
A spokesman for the Justice Ministry would not say whether Malta would support the proposal, which was shot down by France, adding that the matter would be “pursued in the coming weeks” together with Nationalist MP Franco Debono who chairs Parliament’s Select Committee on the Codification and Consolidation of Laws.
The proposal for a directive outlined by European Justice Commissioner Vivienne Redding went further than the broad agreement reached in 2009 by member states, allowing suspects to consult a lawyer before being interrogated by the police.
The right to consult a lawyer for one hour before interrogation was only introduced in Malta last year despite the provision having been part of the law since 2002.
“While a broad agreement between member states already existed on the right of access to a lawyer before interrogation, this latest proposal will need to be assessed by all 27 member states and decided upon at Council level in due course,” the spokesman said.
He pointed out that the Commission’s proposal was the next step in the EU roadmap adopted in November 2009 to foster protection of suspected and accused persons in criminal proceedings. Three landmark decisions by the Maltese Constitutional Court last April held that the fundamental human right to a fair trial was breached when suspects were denied the right to speak to a lawyer.
Dr Debono had said that allowing access to a lawyer was an important step in the right direction but Malta had to continue monitoring the situation, especially after the European Commission’s proposal. He also spoke of the need to introduce the right of disclosure and allowing access to a lawyer during interrogation proper. As things stand, the police are not obliged to disclose any information about the case to the lawyer, which affects the quality of legal advice given to the suspect. Also, a lawyer cannot be present during the interrogation.
Speaking on Monday during the TVM discussion programme Bondìplus, Labour justice spokesman Josè Herrera disagreed with the presence of a lawyer during interrogation but insisted the right of disclosure was necessary for lawyers to give proper advice.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr C Galea
Jun 16th 2011, 16:13
It is fasicinating to read why local authorities should fear the presence of a lawyer if they are clean themselves??????????? forget about other countries.
Mr Joseph Calleja
Jun 16th 2011, 16:06
Not allowed to have a lawyer present during interrogation makes us a third world country with a third world government. Having a lawyer present will not only protect the rights of the accused but it also protects the rights of the police doing the interrogation. They only shoot and ask questions later in third world countries.
Mark Jones
Jun 16th 2011, 14:18
I cannot understand why anyone who claims to have an interest in justice, like Mr Herrera, should object to a lawyer being present during an interrogation.
We have seen enough stories of alleged police brutality in these situations to suggest that the proposed change would benefit both the suspect and the police. Or have the forces of law and order - and Herrera - something sinister to hide?
Mr Carmelo Aquilina
Jun 16th 2011, 14:10
this is a right that the Police and the Government have to grant becauseit will invalidate their case - this is a case of wanting to be European without doing any of the hard work or culture change
Mr mark johnson
Jun 16th 2011, 13:55
"Labour justice spokesman Josè Herrera disagreed with the presence of a lawyer during interrogation "
Cheers mate, you won't be getting my vote.
Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti
Jun 16th 2011, 13:41
It is a right in Australia and the sky has not fallen down on us! Goodness gracious, what's next. Divorce!!!!! Enter the 21st century.
Joe Fenech
Jul 8th 2011, 01:22
Considering that Malta is still living in the Middle Ages, that would be a massive leap!
Mr Paul Barrett
Jun 16th 2011, 11:26
Having a lawyer present during questioning is actually to the advantage of the Police in that it would take away the unfounded claims of duress. Either the Police have the evidence to prosecute or they have not got the evidence. Questioning a suspect should only be to the extent that the suspect is given the chance to explain away any evidence that may initially point to his/her guilt rather than waste both Police and Court time on false leads.
Alfred Bugeja
Jun 16th 2011, 12:58
The same aim can be achieved by video recording the interrogation procedures, which is something that is in the process of being implemented by the Police Corps.
Mr Peter Agius
Jun 16th 2011, 13:18
The usual catch word of hardened criminals in front of Police interrogation is "naghzel li ma nwegiebx" -
"I choose not to answer". So in these cases the presence of a lawyer is superfluous. Or maybe in the presence of their lawyer they will choose to answer, Mr.Barrett?