Brussels tries again for common asylum rules
The European Commission yesterday tabled revised proposals aimed at stimulating a compromise between the 27 member states and the European Parliament over proposals to streamline rules on asylum and give rights to people with humanitarian protection.
The proposals, in various forms, have been in discussion for three years, without agreement.
Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom said she has “no illusions” about the EU’s promise to have a common set of rules by 2012 as member states were still resisting the proposals.
The new set of proposals have left on the table one of the most contentious issues in the previous package – a revision of the so-called Dublin II rules. This aims for a temporary suspension from these rules for those member states like Malta experiencing a sudden influx of illegal immigrants.
According to the current rules, asylum applications have to be dealt with by those member states where asylum seekers place their first application, clearly posing an extra burden on frontier member states like Malta and Italy. The Commission is suggesting that these member states should be exempted from this rule if they are overwhelmed by arrivals. However member states have so far rejected this amendment.
“It is unacceptable that, within Europe, with its common values and laws, and its states that are signatories of the same international agreements, the level of protection of asylum applicants varies to this extent,” from one country to the next, Commissioner Malmström said yesterday in Brussels.
“The same individual, applying for the same reasons, has a 75 per cent chance of having his application accepted in one country and less than one per cent in another.”
With the migration pressure resulting from the Libyan conflict, she said she hoped to see the proposals approved without delay.
The Commission is aiming to set standards to speed up the review of applications – which should take no more than six months at first instance – and to guarantee legal assistance and information for applicants.
It also wants guarantees on the right to housing, health care, material support and education, as well as to work legally within six months of obtaining international protection.
Nationalist MEP Simon Busuttil, who is the European People’s Party (EPP) spokesman on migration, welcomed the proposals yesterday but warned that major adaptations would have to be made in order to reach an agreement.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Colin Stanley
Jun 3rd 2011, 17:07
Did I understand this correctly What do they mean by housing , do we have to give them somewhere to live, like a flat or something, if so, what about the Maltese who need housing ? can someone please explain.
Ms Louise Vella
Jun 2nd 2011, 12:19
Let's forget all this mumbo jumbo and be real. No EU country wants to attract illegal immigrants by improving the prospects of giving them refugee status. No EU country wants to help us with our problem of illegal immigrants except by taking a few of them as a token. Malta is the fool in this pantomime because we take all those who come. Malta has not set any limit to the numbers of them it will take and therefore has indicated that it will take even 100 000 if they come.
Indeed the Maltese government is sending out the AFM boats to pick illegal immigrants and bring them to Malta. On top of it all, we also accept those who escape from Malta and go to some other EU country. It's time the Maltese government put the national interest first and refused to accept this situation where Malta has all duties and no rights. It's no use waiting for a positive outcome from this farce played by the Swede Cecilia Malmstrom and the Conservative Nationalist Simon Busuttil.
Sean Grima
Jun 2nd 2011, 13:58
empty vessels are the ones which make most sound.
Mr carlos ellul
Jun 2nd 2011, 11:56
Basically it state that we should give red carpet treatment to the immigrants, Meanwhile if Malta suffers from a sudden influx of immigrants (the EU big guys decide when this had occurred and not us) then maybe the EU would consider a temporary suspension of the Dublin 2 treaty. How long it will take to Simon and co before they understand that the EU big guys care only of dictating things to us?
Charles Sammut
Jun 2nd 2011, 09:24
"“The same individual, applying for the same reasons, has a 75 per cent chance of having his application accepted in one country and less than one per cent in another.”
One guess as to in which country an individual has a 75% chance of fobbing off the authorities with his/her sob story and gaining protection.