Advert

Philippines must not follow Malta, Church says

The outcome of the divorce referendum in Malta has made the Episcopal Commission on Family and Life of the Philippines even more determined to ensure that divorce is not legalized in the Philippines.

"It is very unfortunate what happened in Malta but it also makes us even more resolved to protect the institution of marriage," Fr Melvin Castro, executive secretary of the commission told the Filipino media.

Meanwhile, Archbishop Emeritus Oscar Cruz  said the proposed divorce bill was "anti-Filipino."

In an interview carried on ABS-CBN, the Archbishop said the Philippines should not follow Malta's course.

The country's parliament is due to start debating a divorce bill on Wednesday.

President Aquino earlier said he was against divorce for fundamental reasons, but acknowledged that marriage was not for everyone.

“I do recognize that there have been unions that were wrong, that no matter what interventions are done, no matter what counselling is done, they really cannot stay together. There is danger to either one or both parties in the marriage especially the children. Divorce is a no-no. But in legal separation, you can assert that there really are irreconcilable differences,” Aquino said.

The Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines said legalizing divorce would lead to more broken marriages in the country.

Fr  Castro said legalizing divorce gives couples an easy way out instead of solving their problems.

"They divorce their first, second, third spouses because they have this image of the ideal spouse. If the marriage falls short of that image, they will separate," he said.

He noted: "If a court proves that there is psychological incapacity, the marriage is annulled. But then why should they be allowed to marry again? We just pass on the problem to the next marriage."

Advert

78 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

connie sullivan

May 31st 2011, 16:23

Well said - prosit.. Hope this comment will be read by all. Maybe they stop blaming the church for everything. This is in the bible and it is clear and that is why the church cannot agree with divorce.

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:11

Lil Ms Xaxa Caruana. Jekk int trid tghid li int Kattolika missek ivvutajt Le. Int taf li Kristu ma ridx divorzju u ghamilt ta rasek. Gewwa il-bini tal-Knisja tista tmur kemm trid hadd mhu ser ikeccik izda ifhem wahdek. Mela jIen u it-tfal tieghi wiehed ghandu 24 yrs u l-ohra 19yrs ivvutajna Le ghax ahna Kattolici ta VERU u ghax ftit maggoranza qalet IVA allura ha jkollna ngawdu it-tahwid li ser igib mieghu Id-divorzju u dan li kien referendum non-binding! x'ezempju tghajna lil Filippini, kemm irridu inhalsu ghalih. u l-iskandlu li sejrin nghatu lit-tfal jigifieri dak ihalli lil mummy u jmur ma ohra jew il-mummy tmur ma iehor dan min se jhallas ghalih?

Rita Smith

Mr Robert Farrug

May 31st 2011, 11:47

Tparla mod Gorg, u tinstiga b'tatici ta' teddida fuq livel spritwali mod iehor. Il-problema mhux ghax il-knisja tesprimi ruha (ma nilabuwix ta subghajna f'halqna). Il-mezzi li tuza huma ghalija kontra l-istess tghalim li thaddan tant.

Ms Rudi Mcbeal

May 31st 2011, 11:55

Because a lot of people are hypocrites, G Borg - they want remain "Catholics", attend mass and recieve the Holy communion but at the same time they expect the Church to bend the rules according to their needs, or else...they wreak havoc. I have no doubt in my mind that many of those who voted yes for divorce did so solely to spite the church without giving the slightest thought to any social negative consequences they might have to face in future. They made their bed, now I hope that they are prepared to lie in it - the only misfortune is that the rest may have to suffer with them too.

Ms Xaxa Caruana

May 31st 2011, 16:04

@Ms Rudi Mcbeal

Mela igifieri skont int Ms Rudi, hafna ivvutaw Iva bhala dispett lejn il knisja, u hallina tridx.
Jien ivutajt iva, ghax hekk qaltli il kuxjenza tieghi, il vot tieghi jfisser ghajnuna ghal min vera ghandu bzonnu.
U haga ohra who will suffer from it????? Mela inti hsibt li issa jekk koppja jkollha argumnet hekk maljar malajr, divorzju, u hallina tridx.
U please il knisja hi ta kulhadt, ta min ivvota iva u ta min ivota le, jew forsi tahsbu li ghax jien ivutajt iva ma ghandix dritt imur knisja? Tkomplux tipruvaw thaddru lin nies kontra il knisja ghax bil comments bla sens dak li qed tipruvaw taghmlu.
Issa il poplu ghazel, trid taccetawha din, so TINQDEWX iktar bil knisja biex tizvugaw id-dizapunt taghkhom.

Ms Rudi Mcbeal

Jun 1st 2011, 11:13

Yes, Ms Xaxa, I have no doubt in my mind that it was one of the main reasons. Whether you feel you still want to be a devout or not is none of my concern, that is entirely up to you, and you alone. Certainly no one is forcing you not to. My views about divorce have absolutely nothing to do with any religion, or the church - what concerns me most is it's effect on society in general because as I have experienced it elsewhere I do not see why it won't happen here too. I stopped going to church years ago because I felt that unless I was both able and ready to abide by all its rules, it was totally pointless. I do not want to be a HYPOCRITE. Does that give me the right to feel any resentment and anger for the church? Do I ever rant, rave and spew venom against it? Definitely NOT, Ms Xaxa - who the hell am I to tell the the church to change its rules to accomodate me? And you have the cheek to suggest that someone like myself is trying to use it and turn people against it? How dare you?

Re your question about who will suffer from it, well, I shall let time answer your question, and I assure that I have nothing to be disappointed about, my conscience is crystal clear. I am merely airing my views. I hope that I am at least entitled to that.

Mr Eric Gahn

May 31st 2011, 10:27

Why Gouder only? I propose Mario Grech too. Such an ace card.

Mr Joe Gatt

Jun 1st 2011, 13:40

Mr Eric Gahn

Make it a Trio, throw in Joe Zammit ta Borg In Nadur too.

connie sullivan

May 31st 2011, 10:00

The church is part of our society, and like all other people has right to express her feeling about this issue. The church has right not to agree with divorce. Everyone has his own/her opinion which we can express freely - and again I say - so those the church - but it seems that people want to be democratic when it pleases them. The people have voted in favour of divorce - now it is time to move forward and the church to continue the work in having stronger families. And what is so wrong with the apology!!!!. Some people hurt the church in the last weeks - some people might have felt hurt by the Church - as simply as that. Now live goes on...

Mr Robert Farrug

May 31st 2011, 11:37

@ connie - i'm sure you did not witness the holy sisters taking out the elderly to vote. That was very democratic indeed. Telling them what to vote. And all that going to HELL brainwashing and CHRIST NO thingy and SINS!!! Are you serious or is everyone forgetting already the church's propaganda? That was not just expressing an opinion to me!!! And since when are we talking about freedom of expression? Hypocrits!!! I'm not gonna forget the church's mess not even if they crawl on the floor singing the apology!! To hell with them all!!

connie sullivan

May 31st 2011, 16:34

Do you thing that it is only the church that has put on a progobanda. We had the Iva for divorce and the other side too. That is why we live in a democratic place - so everyone has rights for their own belief and express it too. We are a Catholic country here as a big majority of us are catholic and for those who do not believe in God - NO ONE IS ABOVE GOD - If the church hurt some people or let us say a lot, people have also hurt the church. But we are supposed to forgive and that is why the church forgave and issued an apology to others. And let us say that a minority of the priests came out aggressively on this issue (which by the way other lay people did) , would you put all the priests under the same catagory.

EDWIN DE MARCO

May 31st 2011, 10:08

Is-sewwa jirbah zgur izda t-telliefa ma jaqblux!

Mr Alex Buds

Jun 1st 2011, 01:20

If you lost, and victory over the devil is guaranteed, what is the implication for you?

Ray Gatt

May 31st 2011, 10:00

The state are the people and the people have all the power. The people have spoken and you just have to accept the peoples vote. I know that you were very sure that victory was yours', but unless you hibernated last weekend, the result spoke for itself. Even with all the scaremongering and threatening from the church, YES won for it was the right thing to do. So Mr. Zammit et al, stop being the laughing stock of our democratic country and live and let live. Next step: State and Church divorce. No more power for the church is State affairs.

Join the battle between State and church! Fight the good fight! VICTORY IS OURS, IT'S ALREADY GUARANTEED!!! One down, NEXT.

angelo cilia

May 31st 2011, 11:23

Na Na Na Na ..hey hey hey, good bye !

You are a Loser Joe.

Admit it !

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:21

Joe is right here Parliamentarians have to answer to God like the rest of us. Nobody is exempted if one is a Christian. When one is called a Christian it is because one follows the teaching of Christ. If not why bother to be baptized or christened. Some people give a different meaning to being a Catholic and Christian. They are the same thing.

RS

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:22

To Angela Cilia. No no no we are all losers


RS

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:23

Have you never done mistakes as a human being? You have done one now if you voted Yes


Rita smith

Colin Stanley

May 31st 2011, 10:42

What next .now that we are a modern country, same sex marriages, get the crucifix out of public places. what do people like you think?

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:26

Sorry then they are not true Catholics. Why does everyone want the bad example to prevail? They are called Christians also and Christ which Christians derives of disliked divorce. What is your comment now?

Rita Smith

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:27

For sure they will. We made a big mistake. A great offence to Almighty God our Creator after all.

Rita Smith

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:29

A true Christian or Catholic should be like Alfred Gatt. You are a true Christian if you are a witness of Christ and not a"libertin"

Rita Smith

Mr Joe Gatt

Jun 1st 2011, 17:35

Mr Jeffrey Mallia

Jekk jitla jghinhom Joe Zammit Tal `LE` jitilfu zgur Guaranteed.

`Yes` will win if old JZ, goes on a crusade in the good old Phillipines. guaranteed.

Boy how he despises that little poor mean old Devil.

But in reality, deep down he`s a sweet old guy with an attitude.

He definetly was a great big asset to the `Yes` campaign here in Malta

Thank you Joe, you will be rewarded, guaranteed.

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:32

What social justice, social disaster more likely


Rita smith

Ms Rita Smith

Jun 1st 2011, 09:34

What's the use of preaching the Gospel to someone like you. For you it will go in from one ear and out from the other.

Rita Smith

Kevin S.

May 30th 2011, 19:32

read the article before you comment!

Ms P.M Graham

May 30th 2011, 19:48

@kevin S

I did and I reiterate:

When will the Church learn that they must not interfere in Politics. The Church is NOT a political party.

connie sullivan

May 30th 2011, 20:38

The church is part of our society, and like all other people has right to express her feeling about this issue. The church has right not to agree with divorce. Everyone has his own/her opinion which we can express freely - and again I say - so those the church - but it seems that people want to be democratic when it pleases them. The people have voted in favour of divorce - now it is time to move forward and the church to continue the work in having stronger families. And what is so wrong with the apology!!!!. Some people hurt the church in the last weeks - some people might have felt hurt by the Church - as simply as that. Now live goes on...

Tony Borg

May 31st 2011, 08:05

Mr. Graham, The religion/church with it's followers and preachers, is the oldest political party in the World!!

Mr Patrick Zammit

May 30th 2011, 19:02

Nice...

Mr Joseph E Briffa

May 30th 2011, 18:50

Divorce is NOT the solution to the cases you quote. IF these women you mention had the financial means to leave their violent husband they would do so; it's only their financial constraints that enslave them to their violent husband.

Mr Joe Gatt

May 31st 2011, 01:54

Mr Joseph E Briffa

it's only their financial constraints that enslave them to their violent husband.

So, I see now, that is how the local church, which now says it will work harder for stronger famillies, by helping out financially.
The stronger the family the greater the financial assistance.

Charles Sammut

May 30th 2011, 19:49

But it wants to teach!

Mr Joe Gatt

Jun 1st 2011, 16:59

So did Stalin, Hitler Saddam each one of them always preach their own gospel.

God rest their turbulent souls.

Mr Peter Borg

May 30th 2011, 18:06

Delightfully ironic .

Ms Manquareiel de Caveden

May 30th 2011, 19:43

Hey hope is not lost for Malta. Remember that out of all the Italian regions, those most averse to the Vatican, religion and clerics are the so-called red regions, which can be found in central Italy. These are traditionally left-leaning and very anti-clerical. Guess what these lands were called before: the Papal States - they were areas of land controlled by the Popes until 1870 during the Risorgimento! There you have the link that explains the very anti-clerical sentiment they have there even today.

Advert
Advert