Advert

Update 2: Voter turnout at around 72 per cent

 

Turnout for the divorce referendum was around 72 per cent by the time voting came to an end, the Electoral Commission said.

This was the lowest turnout ever in Malta, well below the low 78.8 turnout in the 2009 MEP elections.

The 2004 MEP election had had a turnout of 82.4 per cent, the EU referendum – 90.9 per cent and the last General Electon – 93.3 per cent.

The Ballox boxes are currently arriving and being received at the Mediterranean Conference Centre.

The boxes are being emptied and the ballots are being put face down in preparation for counting tomorrow.

The Electoral Commission yesterday confirmed that 20,775 voting documents remained uncollected, four times the number at the last general election.

Voting went smoothly in all localities. 

In Mellieha, elderly voters who needed assistance because they could not read the referendum question were apparently asked whether they would like to divorce, instead of whether they wanted to vote yes or no for divorce.

Although small queues were noted in some localities, voters did not generally have to wait long although those who had to cross over to Gozo to cast their vote had to queue for up to two hours as only two boats were in operation.

The country's leaders cast their vote early this morning, Archbishop Paul Cremona at 7.30.

This evening, the bishops issued a note apologising to anyone who may have been hurt by any words or actions taken by members of the Church during the referendum campaign.

They also stressed the need for collective investment in marriage.

The bishop's note was embargoed to 10 p.m. but the embargo was breached by Maltatoday leading the Church to lodge an official complaint with the electoral commission.

The note also led the divorce movement to request an hour's extension to voting. The request was turned down.

Just over 304,000 people were able to vote since close to 22,000 voting documents, representing six per cent of voters, were uncollected.

Vote counting will take place tomorrow at the Mediterranean Conference Centre in Valletta with the sorting of votes starting at about 10 a.m. The result is expected about two hours later.

The official turnout table given by the Electoral Commission.

 District 1

  71%

 District 2

  71%

 District 3

  72%

 District 4

  73%

 District 5

  72%

 District 6

  70%

 District 7

  72%

 District 8

  73%

 District 9

  71%

 District 10

  71%

 District 11

  75%

 District 12

  69%

 District 13

  70%

PN THANKS ELECTORATE

In a statement, the Nationalist Party thanked the electorate for voting in the referendum.

It expressed satisfaction that another useful exercise in democracy was carried out for the people to take a decision which was above partisan politics.

The PN said it would wait for the result to see what the people wanted and thanked the two movements that worked to convince the people about their positions.

Advert

31 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Lydia Pace Workman

May 29th 2011, 17:15

No, I think the word is 'boloh' since they were so convinced that the 'no' votes would predominate!!

Ms Agnes Bezzina

May 29th 2011, 07:23

Hello!! Are you serious?! There are countries where people do not even have a say re who governs them, and you are complaining because a decision of the sort was taken to referendum level?! How can you complain? How shameful!!

Chantelle Falzon

May 29th 2011, 07:55

I tend to disagree with you Mr Grillo, this choice is not about which road to repair, or a cultural project which obviously the Goverment which we decided to appoint, decides. This is a choice of life. Although the group effected is a minority one, as everyone wishes that his/her marraige flourishes, this might actually effect each and everyone in our society. This was a choice of life for the present if you are in need now and for the future, if at any point in time you need to. Everyone hopes that no one use it, but for those who are suffereing they do not have any other option but to take a Divorce, to start over with a new page in life.

Stephanie Vella

May 29th 2011, 08:47

Are you serous yourself? Are you usually consulted with regards to which laws should be re enacted in Malta? You must be a very important person... This should have been a Government decision and laws protecting even the minority of the people need no referendum! There you go now approx Euro 4,000,000 down the drain when they have been put to better use....

Mr Saliba Francis

May 29th 2011, 09:42

In Switzerland referenda are held regularly on most serious issues. That is true democracy in action because it neutralizes the harm that some politicians try to do against the wishes of those who elected them.

Mr Mike Abbot

May 29th 2011, 10:11

Ms Agnes Bezzina - Chris is totally right. A referendum to decide what a minority needs is totally wrong and it's also wrong to congratulate a government that stood by while the church scared and threatened voters and also stood by (along with the government) while other groups, in the name of god, scared and threatened people.

As a member of the public you should not be defending your government's every move, you should be critical and demanding. They have a job to do (with our taxes) and every time people make excuses like lowering the bar so low as to compare them to dictatorships, it ultimately makes them weaker and act less accountable. In other words, the more they hear comparisons, like yours, with other countries the less they need to try.

joseph quintano

May 29th 2011, 01:57

i agree completely with this. we have to vote with our mind . we are not puppets

Reuben Abela

May 28th 2011, 23:25

those who don't want divorce voted no, those who want divorce voted yes...

who are you to say those who didn't vote don't want divorce ?

it's true that abstensions are open to a big amount of interpretations... maybe a more accurate one could be that they dont exactly agree with how the bill was brought up but in principle are in favour of divorce, yet. they dont want to be in the way of those who really need/want it.

Reuben Abela

May 29th 2011, 00:01

my reply was meant to go to Stephanie Scicluna below

Mr Edward Caruana Galizia

May 29th 2011, 03:36

or maybe they just could get a flight down to Malta. Or maybe they find the whole thing absurd and couldnt get time off work to fly down to Malta. Lots of Maltese now live and work abroad. Try explain things to your employer in the UK. " I have to go to Malta to vote in a referendum on divorce. Could I have these days off to fly down?"

Ms Lucia Davies

May 29th 2011, 09:41

I agree with you I was an agent a few times during elections and these agents of different political opinions watch each other like a hawk, that is their job after all, so I cannot believe that they were all in agreement to this question,, if so they were not doing their job,, the vote is read at the desk in front of all in the room that is why they close the doors and just let one voter in ,, so please

Ms F Goodwin

May 29th 2011, 12:08

The electoral commissioner on site admitted he witnessed this abusive practice and intervened. So she didn't get away with it, but yes it sounds like it's true.

Mr M Mamo

May 29th 2011, 00:02

i disagree with you ... I know a lot who voted No, not because the church said no (they are not even church goers) but because they do not agree with this particular proposal.

Since the Iva movement stated that divorce will be introduced some day or another, they preferred waiting to vote Yes for a proposal that gives the needy people the chance to divorce instead of everyone who wishes to.

Harley Fallows

May 29th 2011, 00:07

So your concluding that because people didn't turn up they dont want divorce ? Very good reasoning there. Also its very insensitive that you said the people who needed special assistance made a mistake while voting. The actual probable fact is that all the people didn't even bother to collect there voting cards and vote because there too scared to do so because the church wont be happy. If they want to vote yes and are religious guided then the idea that god is not going to be happy affects them, so rather than being a "Sinner" lets just not vote and we wont have to feel guilty what ever the outcome. Its sad that so many people are told to do so many things because the church said so. Im very proud to have my own mind and decide for myself.

Mr andreas bone

May 29th 2011, 00:22

Most probably a lot of people felt there shouldnt have been a referendum for something that should have been there as a civil right in the first place.

Colin Zammit Lupi

May 29th 2011, 01:47

It's amazing that you know what everyone who didn't vote thinks. Well, you can count me out of your ridiculous supposition. I didn't vote because I am currently overseas. Unlike other countries, Malta doesn't have a system which allows its overseas citizens to vote in it's embassies. I would have voted YES. It's also quite likely I'm not the only one.

Lydia Pace Workman

May 29th 2011, 17:25

I read it on MSNBC, one of the most reputable news channels worldwide. Check it out.

Advert
Advert