Women have ‘nothing to lose’ with the introduction of divorce
The pro-divorce movement yesterday slammed its rival movement for its “coordinated scaremongering campaign” on the impact of divorce on women, saying women would not lose any of the rights they had today.
Chairman Deborah Schembri insisted that with the introduction of divorce, women would not lose anything.
She hit out at the anti-divorce camp which she said was “insensitive to the pain and hardship women found themselves in when their marriage broke down”.
“Women have nothing to fear from divorce. Nothing will change in their lives that cannot already happen with separation or annulment,” she said.
Speaking at a press conference, she said the proposed divorce law ensured all social benefits currently received by separated women would continue to be received when there was divorce. These included social benefits and children’s allowance. Financial support from the husband agreed in the separation contract would also continue to be paid.
She quoted family law expert Ruth Farrugia, who recently said the introduction of no-fault divorce reduced domestic violence and female suicides.
Referring to the issue of pension eligibility for former wives, Dr Schembri explained that they were entitled to this only by marriage and that once the marriage ended, the right to this pension also ended.
However, she said the divorce Bill featured a clause that allowed the judge presiding over the divorce case to take into account the investment that the former wife would had put into the marriage, and adjust the maintenance accordingly.
She said with an annulment, the right to any pension automatically fell through when the marriage was annulled. Referring to the proposed cohabitation law, Dr Schembri said it was obvious it would not cover separated people who found new partners, since this would clash with the marriage law.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Ms Emma Xerri
May 24th 2011, 14:40
Only a bad marriage.
Mr Paul Licari
May 24th 2011, 14:29
If you want answers to many of the queries see and hear Fr. Hayden’s talk
“In-Nisrani quddiem id-Divorzju”
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?p=PL53CEF994615F4831
and
www.frhayden.org
Bud Moureaux - Flanders (BE) & Xemxija, SPB (MT)
May 24th 2011, 13:59
May I suggest to read
Divorce And Remarriage From The Early Church To John Wesley by David L. Snuth (Fall 1990).
The link: http://www.theologicalstudies.org.uk/article_divorce_snuth.html
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
For over 2 years, I have been closely following the ongoing divorce debate in Malta in all possible media and through contacts with Maltese friends and relatives.
Divorce in most cases is not at all an easy way out but a realistic way to end the suffering of a marriage broken down beyond repair, both for the spouses and their children.
Therefore the only sensible and courageous choice for Malta to make is:
(1) To introduce a well balanced civil divorce legislation, respecting the rights and interests of all parties concerned, the spouses and their children.
(2) To separate State and Church, i.e. abolish Art.2 of the Constitution immediately.
This is already 50 years overdue. An untenable situation will then finally cease to persist. In this way, Malta will become a real secular society where Maltese effectively can decide for themselves without fearing to be bullied by Mgr. XYZ or Mr JZ and consorts. The Church in Malta should restrict its role to its teaching and advice to its own flock, i.e. Catholics, but refrain by all means from scaremongering and dictating what others should or shouldn't do.
So, next Saturday, the right choice is IVA - YES!