Israel rejects Obama peace plan, Palestinians cagey
Israel this evening rejected President Barack Obama's call for a peace deal based the 1967 borders, as the Palestinians said their leadership would hold a meeting to discuss the US leader's policy speech.
Obama's address, billed as an announcement of reoriented US policy in the Middle East after a slew of regional uprisings, focused heavily on the stalled talks between Israel and the Palestinians.
He called for a negotiated solution based on the borders that existed before the 1967 Six Day War, but also warned the Palestinians that a bid for UN recognition of a unilateral proclamation of statehood would not work.
"The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states," said Obama.
"The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves, and reach their full potential, in a sovereign and contiguous state."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, due to fly to Washington just hours after Obama's speech, immediately called on the White House to guarantee Israel would not have to withdraw to the 1967 lines.
He urged Obama to commit to the assurances laid out in 2004 by then president George W. Bush, who said "new realities on the ground," meant a "full and complete return" to the 1967 borders was "unrealistic."
"Prime Minister Netanyahu expects to hear a reaffirmation from President Obama of US commitments made to Israel in 2004, which were overwhelmingly supported by both houses of Congress," Netanyahu's statement said.
"Among other things, those commitments relate to Israel not having to withdraw to the 1967 lines, which are both indefensible and which would leave major Israeli population centres in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) beyond those lines," it added.
Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with Obama on Friday and will address a joint session of the US Congress next week.
In the West Bank, the Palestinian leadership responded cautiously, saying it would examine Obama's address before making substantive comment.
"President (Mahmud) Abbas decided to call the Palestinian leadership to an urgent meeting as soon as possible and consult with the Arab brothers to discuss US President Barack Obama's speech," senior Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat told reporters.
He said the Palestinians remained committed to all previous agreements with Israel, "hoping that the Israeli government will do the same, to give the peace process the chance it deserves."
The Hamas movement, which rules the Gaza Strip and this month signed a surprise unity agreement with Abbas's Fatah party, immediately called for Washington to match words with action.
"What Obama needs to do is not to add slogans but to take concrete steps to protect the rights of the Palestinian people and the Arab nation," Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri told AFP.
Obama's speech comes as talks between Israel and the Palestinians are mired in a stalemate over the issue of Israeli settlement construction.
In September 2010, Obama helped launch the first direct talks between the two sides in nearly two years, but they quickly ground to a halt when a partial Israeli settlement moratorium expired.
Netanyahu refused to renew the ban, and the Palestinians have refused to negotiate while Israel builds on land they want for a future state.
As Obama's speech began, an Israeli government committee announced approval for only 1,500 new homes in a settlement neighbourhood in annexed east Jerusalem, a non-governmental group told AFP.
The decision authorised construction of 620 homes in the settlement neighbourhood of Pisgat Zeev, and another 900 in a second settlement neighbourhood, Har Homa, said the Ir Amim organisation, which calls for Palestinians and Israelis to share Jerusalem.
Israeli lobby group Peace Now deplored the timing and content of the interior ministry's decision.
"The prime minister is sacrificing relations with the US for the sake of his loyalty to settlers," it said in a statement. "This is not just miserable timing but a miserable policy which endangers Israel's standing in the world."
"Netanyahu's decision to discuss Har Homa and Pisgat Zeev today is a clear message to the Americans about Israel's real policy which refuses to even discuss (sharing) Jerusalem," Hagit Ofran, of Peace Now's Settlement Watch unit, told AFP.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Ian Ellul
May 20th 2011, 10:59
As for the 1967 borders ... Why does nobody mention that those were the borders Israel agreed to in 1948 following a war on it by 6 Arab armies? The Arabs rejected that then and the only reason they want to go back to the 1967 borders is so that Israel will be a sitting duck !!! Never again!
Bill Khan
May 21st 2011, 11:00
Imagine in the middle of the night a gang of peole supported by the local thugs enter your home and forcifully occupy three of your five rooms. You , your wife and chldren are shifted in tto the remaining two. You ae not allowed to go to the kitchen and use the toilets only by permission. You react and yu re beaten up, and your child is killed and another of your rooms is taken over as more people are moved in.. You water supply is also terminated. You are threatened with severe repurcussions if ou even look in thair direction. What would be your response?
Ms Emma Xerri
May 20th 2011, 08:13
If GOING BACK can solve the world problems, let's all go back through the time tunnel; and Americans ought to board the Mayflower back to England leaving the
New World to Indians; Pakistan should go back to India.
Taiwan should go back to China..."
Arabs should go back to Arabia, Judea should go back to the Jews since of all the ancient peoples who inhabited that land the Jewish people are the only known survivors (so are the Samaritans, but the Jews and Samaritan are of the same nation), Egypt should go back to the Copts, Kurdistan to the Kurds, Assyria to the Assyrians, Nubia (in today Egypt and Sudan) to the Nubians, Tamazgha (North Africa) to the Imazighen (Berbers) and so on and so forth
We need to go back to pre-1453 borders and give back Constantinople to the Greeks. What about Greek rights?
Mr Joseph Brincat
May 20th 2011, 00:18
AMERICA's FOREIGN POLICY IS CHANGING
THE ARAB ARE CHANGING
ISRARL HAVE TO CHANGE "TO"
OR ALES GOD ONLY KNOW's ?????????
Mr Terry Gosden
May 19th 2011, 22:07
Again Israel rejects the only path that will lead to peace in the region, they always move the goal post claiming to be victims. Its a pity that the good Israelis have not overthrown their conquest orientated government like other Arab Countries have done. The world watches whilst great injustices are being carried out, Israel has the right to exist, but so too does Philistine, not behind a blockade. The world is changing, Israel has to change, else it becomes a bigger threat to itself than either the Palestinians, and or other regimes in the region.
Money in itself does not buy peace, nor does force of arms, Look to the future and what you will be leaving your children, they will not thank you in hindsight for the path you are on.