Lotto prizes cut
Lotto players were dismayed to find a substantial cut in the winnings last Saturday due to a capping policy.
Maltco said yesterday the latest lotto draw resulted in very high winnings amounting to 203 per cent of sales. In line with the rules, the company was obliged to cut winnings to 70 per cent of sales when the total winnings for the prima, ambo and terno categories were above such level. Maltco said it would increase winnings to 30 per cent of sales when total winnings for the prima, ambo and terno categories were below that level.
The company is also obliged to pay a guaranteed government tax of 20 per cent on the sales of lotto, besides commissions to lotto receivers, which amount to seven per cent of sales and two per cent on the amount of prizes cashed, irrespective of the amount won.
The rules, it said, could be viewed at every lotto booth and the company’s website.
It said it had for the past years been subsidising the amount paid out as winnings whenever these were higher than 70 per cent of the sales to sustain the game and maintain its appeal among the playing public. “This is no longer sustainable and capping will be effected at 70 per cent for the foreseeable future,” it said.
The winning numbers at last Saturday’s draw were 87-71-16-2-17.
According to Maltco’s website, the winning amount in case of the prima is 64 times the stake; 250 times the stake in the case of the ambo; and 4,000 times the stake for the terno.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
David Felici
May 17th 2011, 19:17
Dear Maltco,
Why you never said before that you were subsidising so many winnings? Can you prove this for everyt time it happened? were you so stupid to do this for so many years? Or maybe it only happened once in a while?
If you decided to stop subsidizing the prizes, could nt you inform your clients before? Or you just treat the players like s***?
Can any one from Maltco answer to these questions so the players will now all the reality?
And finally, when you have to increse winnings to 30% , this means that your profits are also higher (40%+) ?!Correct me if I am wrong.
Once again I say....Shame on Maltco!!
Mr Tony Camilleri
May 17th 2011, 12:12
The provision where the winnings can be reduced must be removed because many will have been playing lotto for years on end fattening the pockets of Maltco shareholders and when they happen to win something which most probably will be just a small fraction of what they had paid over the years to Maltco their amount is drastically reduced ad happened and they just get one third of what they were supposed to win. This is a grave injustice which must be removed, first of all because it is a grave injustice on those who win something and secondly because Maltco pays less when the winners only win a small amount.