No Frontex mission around Malta
File photo from a Frontex demonstration in Malta in 2007. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli
No Frontex mission will be held in Malta’s territorial waters after the government and the EU’s border control agency failed to reach agreement over irregular immigration patrols.
“We have not reached any agreement, so there will be no Frontex mission this year,” Home Affairs Minister Carmelo Mifsud Bonnici told The Sunday Times.
Although various technical and political meetings were held between the two sides over the past few weeks, Malta continued to resist the idea of hosting a mission because it did not consider the current rules of engagement to be in its interest.
Furthermore, Frontex was unable to convince potential participating member states to change these rules as demanded by Malta.
“If Frontex changes its mind and manages to convince the other member states about the rules of engagement for the mission it wants to hold in Malta, we will reconsider our position.
“However, at this stage, we have ruled out the possibility of hosting a Frontex mission,” Dr Mifsud Bonnici said.
The news comes amid claims by Libyan Prime Minister Mahmoud Baghdadi that his country cannot do anything to stop the flow of immigrants reaching Italy and Malta from the troubled North African country.
According to the Frontex guidelines, any member state hosting a mission will have to accommodate on its territory all immigrants and asylum seekers found during the operation.
The government has always maintained that these rules were not in Malta’s interest since international law dictated immigrants in distress should be taken to the closest safe port.
Frontex sources said other member states had been sounded out on Malta’s demand to have different rules for its mission based on the ‘closest safe port’ concept. However, the Warsaw-based agency failed to convince them.
This is the second year in a row that Malta has decided not to participate in any Frontex patrol mission in the sea between Sicily, Malta and Libya.
Last year, following four years of active participation, Malta pulled out at the 11th hour from a planned mission.
Although the government had said it was not taking part because of the low number of immigrants landing by sea in 2009, many interpreted the withdrawal as a snub, following the approval of the new guidelines by the EU Council and the European Parliament.
Malta recorded its biggest influx of illegal immigrants in 2008, though the number of crossings from Libya fell by almost half the following year.
Last year, only 47 immigrants arrived, following the controversial pushback agreement between Libya and Italy.
Since the start of the conflict in Libya last February, more than 1,000 immigrants have landed in Malta.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Robert Callus
May 15th 2011, 16:42
"The news comes amid claims by Libyan Prime Minister Mahmoud Baghdadi that his country cannot do anything to stop the flow of immigrants reaching Italy and Malta from the troubled North African country"
There is only one solution - That Baghdadi and the rest of the Gaddafi regime leave the :Libyan people alone. We (EU) should then only co-operate only with potential leaders that show democratic credibility, including signing the Geneva convention for refugees. Otherwise, Frontex or no Frontex, nothing can be done about migrants fleeing Libya, from where all or nearly all African migrants arriving in Malta are coming
Charles Sammut
May 15th 2011, 12:20
Frontex was meant to keep illegal immigrants from reaching Europe's shores. This it achieved by shepherding boatloads of illegal immigrants to Malta where they remain stuck due to the Dublin II convention. It was very successful in this regard.
In the light of this, Malta should have pulled out of the Schengen agreement and even the EU itself. Well we might not have to actually do it, it is all disintegrating nicely and soon it will be each country fending for itself. The only losers will be the fat cats in Brussels, Luxembourg and Strasbourg. The rest of us will hopefully be paying less taxes to shore up the mythical EU (European Utopia) which will go the same way the USSR did a couple of decades ago.
Sean Grima
May 15th 2011, 15:14
heed main street university professor's words of wisdom
Ms Louise Vella
May 15th 2011, 08:56
Just depends what Frontex is supposed to do. So far Frontex has been a ferry service carrying illegal immigrants from the coast of north Africa to the coast of southern Europe. But to fulfil its true mission
Frontex should become a robust coastguard to defend the EU's southern frontiers. Its presence alone should dissuade boats full of illegal immigrants (which have now grown into ships) from leaving Libya and Tunisia. Those which take the risk anyway should then be pushed back politely but firmly and told to go back where they came from.
Sean Grima
May 15th 2011, 15:14
what naivety!
Mr James Cauchi
May 15th 2011, 20:22
Frontex could be viewed as a kind of 'lifeguard' at sea. As Charles Sammut implies, the results are far from dissuasive. A robust lifeguard will not solve the problem - it will only make travel to Europe/ Malta from Africa safer.
Btw Sean - explaining works better.