Marriages and separations up
With just 13 days to the divorce referendum, Kurt Sansone reports on the state of marriages, separations, annulments and divorces in Malta.
The number of marriages last year was the highest ever registered in a decade, according to figures released by the National Statistics Office to mark the International Day of Families celebrated today.
Last year, 2,596 marriages were recorded by the public registry and with 67 per cent of these being religious marriages, the Church may have every reason to be jubilant today as it celebrates the family during a day-long event at Ta’ Qali.
Religious marriages were up by 15 per cent compared with the previous year while civil marriages increased by two per cent.
However, the NSO statistics also reveal a grim reality. The number of separations registered with the public registry last year was 566, an increase of just over seven per cent from the previous year.
And according to data released in Parliament last week, 191 separations were registered in the first four months of this year.
Divorce may not be on the statute books but it is definitely a reality for some, with official figures showing that 47 couples last year – nine more than the previous year – had their overseas divorce recognised by the state.
Since the 1970s the state has recognised divorces obtained from abroad even if both spouses were Maltese and married in Malta as long as certain criteria of domicile in the foreign country are fulfilled. Since 1980, the courts have recognised 785 divorces obtained overseas.
Four of the marriages that ended in divorce in 2010 lasted less than five years. In 15 cases the previous marriage had lasted for 20 years or more while in another 15 cases the marriage endured for between 10 and 19 years. The rest were divorced after a marriage that lasted between five and nine years.
A total of 248 divorced individuals (112 men and 136 women) opted to remarry last year.
Meanwhile, annulments declin-ed by a quarter last year with 124 recorded at the public registry.
According to the NSO, 29 were religious annulments – obtained through the Church Tribunal – and 95 were obtained from the civil courts.
The pattern of duration of the previous marriage for people who obtained an annulment largely reflects that of divorcees.
Eleven annulments were obtained in cases where the marriage lasted less than five years and 43 cases where the previous marriage lasted between five and nine years.
The majority, 53 cases, obtained an annulment between 10 and 19 years of marriage while there were 17 cases were annulment was obtained after 20 years or more.
The latest statistics can be viewed against the backdrop of the country-wide picture that emerged from the 2005 census, which confirmed that marriage was still a popular option with 195,523 people over 16 being married.
However, the census also confirmed that 11,045 individuals were separated, representing three per cent of the adult population aged 16 and over.
Another 2,309 individuals were divorced or had their marriage annulled but did not remarry, contrary to 801 who tied the knot again although this figure also included those who were widowed. A census is expected to be held later this year but data will only be available in 2012.
The differences
Annulment
The marriage never existed. The circumstances that are defined in law that lead to an annulment would have to be present before the marriage was contracted. A couple can obtain an annulment from the civil courts or from the Church Tribunal. However, if one of the spouses opts for the Church Tribunal any civil proceedings would have to stop. The Church Tribunal’s decision will be recognised by the state but not vice versa. Anybody obtaining an annulment can remarry.
Separation
The couple decide to go their separate ways because something goes wrong in the marriage. Any of the spouses can open separation proceedings in court even if the other party does not consent. The court can establish fault to determine issues of maintenance, child custody and the matrimonial home. However, the law also provides for a no-fault separation and both parties can reach an agreement that is registered with the court. Spouses are still considered to be married and irrespective of whether they are living apart or with other partners, they cannot remarry.
Divorce
There are no legal provisions for divorce although the courts do recognise divorces obtained from abroad. The law being proposed would give couples the chance to divorce after four years of separation or after having lived apart for the same period. Like separation, one spouse may file for divorce even if the other party does not consent. The proposal is for a no-fault divorce, meaning the court does not seek to attribute blame. Divorce would allow separated spouses to remarry.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Joe Zammit
May 15th 2011, 16:16
Divorce is a step backward. Progressive people back the indissolubility of marriage.
Divorce is a negative step. Progressive people back the indissolubility of marriage.
Divorce is a big injustice. Progressive people back the indissolubility of marriage which is justice according to the word given in the celebration of marriage.
Divorce is to the detriment of all people. Progressive people back the indissolubility of marriage which good for one and all.
Join in the battle between God and the devil! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it's already guaranteed!
Mr James Cauchi
May 15th 2011, 20:31
Hint, hint. Other peoples' opinions are NOT the Devil...
And letting a married couple decide on what to do if the milk turns sour is also, incidentally, NOT the Devil...
...no matter how many times you repeat the same grammatically incorrect line.
Mr Joe Zammit
May 15th 2011, 16:15
Some are mixing up divorce with remarriage. Divorce is not remarriage. Divorce is the dissolution of a validly contracted marriage by a human person. In an annulment there is no dissolution because there is no marriage.
And here is the evil of divorce: you have a valid marriage in which the spouses have solemnly VOWED to remain each other's, to remain faithful to each other in that, and ONLY in that marriage, and then somebody who has no say in that marriage abuses by declaring that marriage invalid.
What God has united let no man, no State put asunder! This is the greatest argument against the evil and the superficiality of divorce. This prohibition applies to all marriages, religious or not. No person, no MP can vote for it without sinning seriously against God!
Join in the battle between God and the devil! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it’s already guaranteed!
Mr Paul Barrett
May 15th 2011, 14:07
Statistics can often be interpreted to fit whatever picture you are trying to portray. The only point that can really be made from the above statistics is that the idea of marriage is still quite strong and despite not having divorce legislation, marriage breakdowns are increasing much in line with countries that do have divorce legislation.
Ms D Galea
May 15th 2011, 13:25
Some people use statistics as a drunk uses a lamp post.........not for illumination , but for support.
How many of the officially failed ''marriages'' were never real marriages when contracted in a registry office but were contracted on payment to the Maltese 'bride' for the sake of eventually getting Maltese citizenship and a Maltese passaport ?
Does not anyone think that introducing Divorce legislation in Malta will make it easier to abuse the system with more of these so-called marriages (of convenience) being contracted and then dissolved by divorce in due course?
joe muscat
May 15th 2011, 17:06
Skuzani imma l-argument tieghek huwa bazwi...fi kliemek hafna min dawn iz` zwigijiet huma zwigijiet ta konvenjenza , ejja nghidu li hawn ghandek ragun , dawn bid divorzju mhux se zzidhom , ghax seperazzjoni tista` tapplika ghaliha wara ftit zmien taz zwieg , mentri divorzju l-ewwel trid tiehu separazzjoni u wara erba` snin tapplika ghad divorzju. Ahjar nghidu li r realta hi li iz-zwigijiet imfarka qieghdin jizdiedu kull sena , u dan zgur mhux minhabba id-divorzju
Mr david debattista
May 15th 2011, 12:31
So now we can rest assured that marriage breakdowns are not the result of Divorce. We do not have it.
Mr Paul Barrett
May 15th 2011, 11:59
There is for some strange illogical reason opposition to "no fault" divorce. All no fault divorce means is that the couple have been sensible and mature enough to come to an agreement; realise that there is no point in wasting time, money and hot air washing their dirty laundry in public. Why some individuals have to demand that there be a fault in marriage breakdown is just unbelievable interference, sticking their nose into matters that concern no body but the couple themselves.
Gerry Cowie
May 15th 2011, 10:26
An interesting set of statistics. But will comments be biased, sarcastic and anti religious or will they be sensible and balanced in order to convince others?