Software piracy in Malta costs $7m
Software piracy in Malta is estimated at 45 per cent, valued at around $7 million.
Illegal copies of computer software in Malta has an estimated commercial value of $7 million, according to the 2009 piracy study by the International Data Corporation (IDC), a market research firm specialising in information technology, and the Business Software Alliance (BSA), an international non-profit trade association created to protect the software industry and its hardware partners.
This figure has gone up from $5m in 2005 despite the piracy rate remaining relatively stable at 45 per cent, 10 per cent above the EU average, in the same period.
“There could be several explanations for this,” according to Georg Herrnleben, BSA’s senior director for compliance marketing in Europe, Middle East and Asia. “One is that established markets with a strong local IT industry typically have lower piracy rates, see Japan, the US and the Nordics for example. Secondly, piracy is more prevalent in some industries than others. Services and media typically have high piracy rates, so one could assume that the strong Maltese tourism and movie industries contribute to the higher piracy rate.”
Over the years the piracy rate in Malta registered in BSA’s reports has gone down from around 90 per cent in the mid-1990s to 45 per cent in 2009. Since then Malta’s IT industry has evolved and matured, and this, in conjunction with other factors, has led to the downward trend.
“Malta joining the EU contributed to the harmonisation of its laws and legal enforcement mechanism, which could have had an effect as well,” added Mr Herrnleben.
Indeed the official sale, at a nominal price, of popular software like Microsoft Windows, the most popular consumer operating system in the world, and Microsoft Office, the office productivity suite, thanks to an agreement between the Maltese government and Microsoft and in the early Noughties could have also lessened the problem of piracy. Maltese computer users were able to buy perfectly legal copies at a fraction of the retail price without going through the hassle of cracking increasingly sophisticated software protection technologies.
Microsoft has been one of the most, if not the most, active international software manufacturer to keep an eye on developments on software piracy in Malta, despite Malta’s small market size. Indeed in 2009 Microsoft Malta hired an executive responsible for its anti-piracy initiatives locally.
A few weeks ago the BSA launched an anti-piracy campaign in Malta, complete with adverts in the traditional and online media, to urge users to report cases of piracy. However the BSA refutes claims that the campaign in Malta is the result of pressure from one of its members.
“BSA is a member-driven organisation, so in many markets our members’ initiatives will drive BSA action. Keep in mind, though, that BSA is an alliance of several software manufacturers and no one of them has precedence over the others. So campaigns in Malta or any other market are a result of all our members agreeing on the strategy, with the BSA signing off on all campaigns,” insisted Mr Herrnleben.
While the BSA does not have any data on which kind of software is pirated most, from experience it can tell that the most pirated types of software are typically the same as those sold most often, which makes sense.
“People pirate what they can use and what they need, which are also the motivation for buying legally. So the top 10 in the software charts of Malta are probably also the top ten in the piracy charts for Malta.”
Asked about the channels for piracy, the BSA executive said they did not have such data either. However, peer-to-peer and multiple installations of a single legally bought copy of software are certainly among the most widely used methods of piracy. Installation of illegal copies of operating systems and other applications (hard-disc loading) by computer stores on PCs ready for sale has also always been a concern to BSA.
On Peer-to-peer infringements, BSA has just launched the internet piracy portal ( http://internet.bsa.org ) which also gives monthly figures for the number of infractions reported from Malta. Between January and April this year 727 reports were filed with the BSA, with January topping the chart with 240 and just 95 reports in April. In comparison, in Italy, over 157, 263 cases were reported, France was second with 82, 432 and Spain third with 76, 125 reports.
Although Malta’s software piracy rate is above the EU average, the BSA is by no means targeting Malta.
“At any given time, BSA conducts several campaigns across Europe, many of which have similar messaging and focus. While it is rare that a specific campaign will cross the borders of a country, the campaign in Malta is by no means the only market where we are running anti-piracy campaigns. BSA campaigns are designed to raise public awareness of software piracy and to inform businesses and consumers about technical and legal risks which are caused by using illegal software.”
“While we welcome leads from all concerned parties, we usually do not get any notices from employees spying on their boss. Rather, we get contacted by IT professionals or users who have noticed under-licensing in their company, have tried to bring the problem to their superior’s attention, and have been rebuffed. Often, these IT professionals are worried that they will be legally accountable for the illegal state of affairs. They reach out to the BSA to help set things straight when their boss won’t do it.”
The software industry is going through an important transformation, with the rise of so-called Open Source Software (OSS), which is sometimes available free of charge or can be better adapted to the needs of an organisation. There are good alternatives to the most popular vendor-specific software, and even the Maltese government has recently embarked on exercise to exploit OSS where possible.
“The rise of Open Source Software seems to have little impact on piracy. The piracy rate and the commercial value of pirated software have risen over the last years even as OSS has become more accepted in many markets. Even when faced with possible legal charges, users seem to prefer commercial software with its support, maintenance and reliability. A study, commissioned by BSA, examined these attitudes in detail, the results will be available in mid-May,” added the BSA executive.
14 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Timothy Cachia
May 13th 2011, 08:48
Linux is not an operating system you can give to an amateur computer user. ECDL teaches you to use windows and office... and then you give them something different? I do agree that Linux is more reliable, but Windows has and will always be easier to use, maintain and get around.
I also agree with Michael Flaherty... Sometimes, getting series from the internet is the only option since both GO and Melita don't have a very big line up for series, and sometimes show reruns of old series. Satellite could help... by hey... that's illegal too! Also, streaming sites restrict countries and Malta unfortunately, is not allowed to see anything.
Mr Charles Grima
May 13th 2011, 10:04
I.m afraid to say that you haven't used a Linux distribution for ages then Mr. Cachia. When you install Linux, it comes with everything included.
A free download of Linux Mint (695MB) on my Dell Inspiron took 10 minutes to install, and guess what? Every single driver was installed automatically, and every program I needed , office-work, painting, recording, music, installed by itself...while I made a nice cuppa.
So I cannot agree that windows is easier to use...maybe maintain... although Linux repairs itself without help..
I agree with you totally though about the series (sitcoms).... when have we ever seen the hilarity of 'Everybody Loves Raymond'? , or 'Til Death'......
Mr A Spiteri
May 13th 2011, 08:44
why pay for what u can get for free?!?!
long live the free internet!!!
Mr R. Gatt
May 13th 2011, 08:10
Lol, this comes to mind whenever I see piracy related articles:
http://www.geek.com/articles/gadgets/why-people-pirate-movies-20100219/
Ms B Cassar
May 13th 2011, 07:06
One question, one answer.
How do you reduce piracy????
Reduce the prices of software, CDs/DVDs and so on.
It's unacceptable that for a Windows update from Vista to 7 I ended up paying 200 euros for a simple licence. Do you really think that we find money in our back yards? And by the way, even if we rent DVDs instead of downloading them, piracy would still exist. Many rental shops in Malta actually rent copies/pirated movies. So for me as long as I am not selling downloaded files and not making a profit but keeping them for my personal use, I see nothing bad in downloading. At the end of the day I am paying hefty sums for my internet connection. So again one answer,
REDUCE THE EXORBITANT PRICES AND YOU WILL REDUCE PIRACY.
Reuben D. Spiteri
May 12th 2011, 19:29
Not to mention that software code is recycled over and over and OVER. apart from a cosmetic upstyle, how different do you assume something like MS Office 2010 is from its predecessor? Come on!
Michael Flaherty
May 12th 2011, 19:21
A pirated copy does not constitute a lost sale in the non-corporate market. It is highly unlikely that someone who would have to pirate would actually afford to buy the software in the first place. 700eu+ for photoshop? Please. As Mr Casha so rightly stated below, Gimp does all that photoshop does (and more) for free.
What about games? I've been recently introduced the the wonderful world of Steam. Even through this, I am sometimes forced to jump through hoops in order to play my games (EA software comes to mind), whereas with a pirated copy, it's a matter of 2 clicks. I've actually resorted to cracking all my games whenever possible, in order to actually be able to play what I paid for without restrictions.
Movies/series. A huge chunk of hate goes to the idiot who decided region locking was a good idea. Seriously?! I've sometimes rented Blurays from the same shop which were of a different region. Needless to say, I felt more than justified in downloading them (in full 1080p glory). Again, jumping through hoops in order to enjoy what was supposed to be a legitimate product, when life would have been much easier had I just pirated it anyway (and saved a couple of euros in the process).
Series. Maltese people enjoy foreign TV too, you know. Sadly, there's no way for us to watch them unless we download - I, for one, would gladly part with my money for Hulu, but again, the idiots who decided on georestriction based on pointless licenses, seem to not want any of my hard earned cash.
TL:DR; Companies should stop whining about piracy, and invest more time in actually making good stuff.
Mr Chris Grillo
May 12th 2011, 21:26
Region locking is a simply stupid idea! And it is also happening with music these days...after we buy the latest release of a good rock album, we find a Japanese version, a deluxe version, and a platinum version... invariably all with extra tracks!
Piracy is here because of the high prices... and you know.... 95% of users use only 5% of each product...how about making stripped down versions of Word? Or an Excel lite?
Needless to say, as an Open Office user, I dont' use them... about the only program I bought is Guitar Pro.
A good lot of other software is free... PDF995, paint.net, AVG, Chrome, Foxit etc...
Mr ALBERT LEONE GANADO
May 12th 2011, 19:20
While piracy is ethically wrong a figure of $7 million is not very high, certainly much less less than the excessive profits likely being made by software companies especially where regular updating charges are involved. Most large organisations do not risk running especially for security reasons other than genuine copies of software . It is probably the small shop or office which resorts to such illegal pirating without realising as A mercieca has rightly pointed out that they can often use just as good open source software which in most cases can satisfy their requirements at no cost at all. This applies particularly to operating systems, office automation software, utilities and database management applications..
Ryan Sammut
May 12th 2011, 18:51
Companies should make use of open source software nowadays. Linux in particular is a very good OS, Open Office is a decent replacement for Microsoft Office and there's much more useful open-source software.
Ramon Casha
May 12th 2011, 17:50
This study has a major flaw, designed to inflate the figures given for the "cost" of software piracy. As the IDC study methodology states, "The commercial value of pirated software is the value of unlicensed software installed in a given year, as if it had been sold in the market."
This means that the study assumes that every pirate copy that is installed would have been bought at retail price if piracy were not an option.
Considering the price of many popular software products, this is not a reasonable assumption. For instance, the entry-level price of Photoshop is $700, while the home version of Microsoft Office is $150, going up to $500 for the professional version, and Windows 7 Professional is $200 (all prices from the suppliers' respective websites).
So, in reality, if piracy were not an option, a great many people who are currently using illegal copies of similar software would look around, either finding a cheaper alternative or going for open source software.
While software piracy (as well as music and videos) certainly takes a bite out of revenue, the figures are nowhere near what is being quoted.
Computer users are becoming more and more familiar with the options out there, such as LibreOffice/OpenOffice, Linux, the Gimp, Inkscape and many other high-quality products which not only are free but can also be continuously upgraded to the latest version at no cost and without any legal entanglements, online activations, license restrictions etc.
Mr Adrian Mercieca
May 12th 2011, 17:30
Do like I do....Use Linux!
I don't use any pirated software at all - I just use free, open-source software on Linux.
Linux itself (a much more secure and reliable alternative to Windows) is free.
It's great.
Mr Tony Camilleri
May 12th 2011, 18:56
Agree with you. Moreover, the high price that is asked for legal software is very high. If the software companies lowered their price more people would opt for legal software. However the best option is you said and its free. So why pay for it when you can get it for free?
Mr Chris Grillo
May 12th 2011, 21:21
Agree Adrian.... Linux is free, and Open Office is enough for most people. GIMP gets everything done. I hate photoshop with a passion and refuse to even work with it at gunpoint. Bloated, overpriced piece of cr*p.
For Windows, I use paint.net , which is excellent..and of course, free....