Advert

Anti-divorce ad ‘intended to mislead’

‘I would understand if this mistake was made by people studying to be translators, but in a core group of lawyers and professionals the billboard message is being done to intentionally mislead’ – Yes movement.

‘I would understand if this mistake was made by people studying to be translators, but in a core group of lawyers and professionals the billboard message is being done to intentionally mislead’ – Yes movement.

The newly-erected anti-divorce billboards with the slogan ‘Divorce without Reason – No Thanks’ have ruffled the feathers of the pro-movement who said they were simply a bad translation of no-fault divorce.

“I would understand if this mistake was made by people still studying to be translators, but in a core group of lawyers and professionals it seems it is being done to intentionally mislead,” Yes movement chairman Deborah Schembri said.

There was a difference between no-fault divorce and “divorce for no reason”, she said.

During separation proceedings, the responsibility for fault would have already been ascertained, and this would not need to be repeated during divorce proceedings, Dr Schembri said.

Besides, to obtain a divorce a couple would need to have lived apart for four years, while during separation proceedings abandoning a partner for two years was considered a fault, she pointed out.

“Those who fight for a fault-based divorce have no idea what these fault-determining proceedings do to children who are dragged in the middle to take witness for one side,” the lawyer said.

The news conference yesterday sought to highlight how the proposed divorce legislation was very conservative, and the main difference from the current separation legislation was that divorce would dissolve a marriage giving the partners the right to remarry.

Dr Schembri said: “When someone certifies someone dead, they do not kill him, but only say he has died. With divorce it is the same, the marriage has ended and therefore it is declared as such,” she said.

The Yes movement maintained that the cohabitation laws being discussed could not be compared with divorce.

“With cohabitation there are fewer rights and less commitment between both parties in the relationship,” Dr Schembri said. Ina statement yesterday, theanti-divorce group had no regrets about its billboard message, saying divorce “without reason” wasgoing to have serious negativeconsequences for children.

“With divorce without reason, children will face a new poverty and injustice when they find themselves living with someone other than their (natural) parent,” the No camp said.

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Steven Grech

May 8th 2011, 11:04

So are you saying that Annulments are a devil's snare too? And the money the church makes from Annulment fees - is this the devil's money?

Mr J Xerri

May 8th 2011, 11:13

'if one divorces his spouse and enters another marriage, one lives in adultery. (Mk 10, 2-12; Mt 19, 2-9). '
So actually it's not divorce which is being condemned here, but entering another marriage. And all the wuotes being mentioned are about actually goeing through a divorce and not voting for the enacting of a law that allows divorce. Actually the real test for Christians is if they ahve a choice, if there is a law allowing divorce in the country.

Mr A. Bezzina

May 8th 2011, 13:04

What has the 'sin of adultery' got to do with divorce? Note this Mr. Zammit, that without divorce most couples, including the same children who the anti-divorce 'crusaders' have been using to shield their arguments, are living through hell as we speak.

The anti-divorce campaign messages are based on misconceptions and prejudice and are, in my opinion, the worst propaganda I've seen in ages!

Advert
Advert