Advert

Update 2 : Anger over 'gay conversion' claim - protest called off

Updated 5.15 p.m. and 9 p.m.

A claim by a pastor of the Evangelical Church in Malta that the Lord had 'converted' three men out of their homosexuality has angered the local gay community and many others.

Gordon John Manche earlier today posted an event on facebook called  "Gay no more- Made new by the power of Christ" to encourage young people to attend a "spiritual gathering" where three formerly gay youths would speak about their conversion out of homosexuality.

Hundreds of comments appeared on the site protesting against Manche's ideas. The post was later removed.

A large number of those who posted comments said they would protest tomorrow outside the Saphire Suite in Zebbug where Mr Manche said he would hold the event.

The protest organisers complained that Mr Manche' had said that homosexuality was a perversion and a sin. They insisted that his comments were hurtful and constituted hate.

The protest was called off in the evening, with the organisers saying on facebook that the police had warned them that they had not been granted permits and anybody showing up for the protest would be booked.

YOUTH COUNCIL CONDEMNATION

The National Youth Council in a statement said it condemns the event organized by Gordon-John Manche,which indicated  that members of the LGBTQ community could somehow be 'healed' from their sexual orientation.

"KNZ recognizes the challenges members of the LGBTQ community face on a daily basis, and believes
that implying that they can or should change their sexual orientation to lead a moral life contributes to the spread of homophobia and an 'us and them' mentality."

The council said that tolerance was one of the fundamental pillars of democracy and it urged the authorities, whether governmental, ecclesiastical or otherwise; to further promote respect for minority rights.

Advert

81 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Ben Cassar

May 9th 2011, 14:00

the oldest lie in satans trickery mate...its not wrong doin this, its ok to do that, bla bla bla....what you really need to do is aknowledg that we are all siners and need a saviour!

Ms Manquareiel de Caveden

May 9th 2011, 15:10

Oooh! Hell fire and brimstone! Aren't we scaaaaaaared!

Ms Manquareiel de Caveden

May 9th 2011, 01:40

Is that what your crystal ball told you?

Mr Matthew Grima

May 10th 2011, 13:42

Oh please, grow up. Do you have a perfect family? Or should I say, does your family act perfect?

Is anyone saying that if you're not gay, atheist or divorced, you're not normal? NO! But you on the other hand are saying otherwise.

People who think with their own brain and not repeating from a 2000 year old selection of story books, say that it's ok to be any one of those 3 stuff, if not all of them, because it's your life and no one else's. Let others live the way they want to unless it is effecting you directly.

Mr M Vella***

May 7th 2011, 18:13

You don't become a heterosexual,you are born one :-#

Ms Y. Vella

May 8th 2011, 15:03

The question isn't "what is wrong in becoming a heterosexual?"
The question is: "what's wrong in being a homosexual?"
And I agree with Mr M Vella, you don't become a heterosexual (or homosexual), you're born one.

Mr M Borg

May 7th 2011, 17:28

Everyone has to apply for a permit where before staging some sort of protest march .

Why should the Gays be special?

Mariella Caruana

May 8th 2011, 10:39

Maltese law states that a public gathering of more than 8 people is unlawful, unless a permit is duly submitted

Ms Manquareiel de Caveden

May 9th 2011, 01:42

Does that mean that a group of say 9 friends that decide to stand at a particular point in public property is unlawful?

Ms Manquareiel de Caveden

May 9th 2011, 01:43

How do you expect them to be happy if they believe someone preying on their emotions by telling them they need to be cured?

Mr Ben Cassar

May 7th 2011, 10:13

one must ask the credibility of the church you attended than Mrs. Witze!!!

1 Corinthians 6:9-10

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

We do not judge the word of god does, but to have two youth gays attending the church and not telling them that their practice is leading them to damnation is a little deceiving is-int it!!!

Mr Mark Anthony Mifsud

May 7th 2011, 12:16

I’m not an authority on Martin Luther, but I suspect that, like most of his contemporary religious thinkers, he did not think very highly of homosexuality. I think he actually referred to it as a “monstrous depravity”, in Volume 3 of his Works.

Mr Matthew Grima

May 7th 2011, 18:05

Both are wrong Ms D Galea. Trying to "cure" is an insult as you are stating that they are sick, which they're not.

Mr Ben Cassar

May 7th 2011, 10:17

Amen Mr Camilleri, AMEN :)

Mr Edward Caruana Galizia

May 6th 2011, 23:16

They can practice their beliefs as much as they like. But they are also a threat. They are a threat to the well-being on all those gay teenagers who are struggling with their sexuality and who still feel that they need to go to any lengths to change it. These vulnerable boys and girls will end up with more problems then before. These men who say they are no longer gay are either lying or were never gay to begin with.

Ms Rhonda Balzan Bastow

May 7th 2011, 05:06

God made people as they are. It is very presumptous to imagine we know what that God wants us to turn on his own creation.

CIVIL RIGHTS IN MALTA NOW

Mr Geoff Gibson

May 7th 2011, 15:14

Well said.

Mrs C Zammit

May 18th 2011, 23:03

Exactly - so how do you explain all the fuss being made by the gay community?

Mr Raphael Vassallo

May 6th 2011, 18:47

But God did not destroy the Camorra. It's still going strong, at least in Naples. Please get your facts right.

Mr Zachary Stewart

May 6th 2011, 18:51

The civil rights of real people on this earth should take precedence over the hurt feelings of your imaginary friends.

Ms G Portelli

May 6th 2011, 19:13

Lev 7:26-27 and Lev 17:10-forbids the eating of blood and insists that this is an abomination. The same could be said about the eating of rabbit meat. That would have put paid to the Maltese national dish and Maltese butchers' license to sell 'mazzit'. Further more in Lev 21:18-23 the God of the Old Testament has a very politically incorrect view on disability and takes great exception to the disabled becoming priests in fact he seems unable to stomach physical imperfections even in animal sacrifices. Some things do change you see and I thank my God that they do!

Ms Emma Xerri

May 6th 2011, 22:43

Eating cute bunny rabbits and the blood of animals (the life force) are disgusting and I agree with Leviticus about this. Animals who chew the cud and have cloven hooves are the only ones that were allowed to be eaten by the Israelites, but personally, I can do without eating meats of any kind.

As to the gays and adulterers, this prohibition had relevant social reasons back then and was punishable by death (population was low so everyone needed to reporduce and there was no DNA testing so men could not be sure if they were the fathers of their offsprings, therefore both parties of the offending couple were stoned to death. It is also pertinent to note that the ancient Hebrews amended this punishment very early on and the couple was usually just 'shamed' within their community.

Mr Manuel Mangani

May 7th 2011, 01:03

@Raphael Vassallo:

Roberto Saviano is to blame for the confusion...

Mr mark johnson

May 7th 2011, 08:23

Perhaps he meant Sadam and Muammar.

Mr M Vella***

May 6th 2011, 19:02

when one pray to God it's ok, but when God speaks to you, than , there is a problem:-! This guy needs help!

Mr Michael Buhagiar

May 6th 2011, 18:30

Just like your words madame. Cant you possibly accept the truth? or is it so progressive today to say that black is white?

Mr Red Forman

May 6th 2011, 19:22

We judge a colour by an aesthetic standard. It's not an opinion, it's a matter of fact. The colour white won't take personal offence by calling it black, just as black won't take offense by calling it white.

On the other hand, sexual orientation is something personal to each and everyone of us, and no one can judge one another, only himself. Moreover, judging by a "spiritual" compass certainly won't improve things. If your imaginary friend says homosexuality is wrong, then make sure you yourself aren't attracted to your own gender, but do not judge others who do out of nature - that's how they were born. Wasn't the Jesus you love so much who said "Do not judge"? Right, then don't.

Mr Alfred Hili

May 6th 2011, 15:35

Whatever sexual orientation one is born with, one can try to be holy and pure, and to keep clear of sexual sins.
" Steer clear of sexual immorality as no other sin affects the body as this one does".
Paul: 1 Corinthians : 6 line 18

Ms M Mifsud

May 6th 2011, 17:16

If, according to Gordon John Manche, three formerly gay youths were "converted out of homosexuality".... How was this proven? Were the three youths sent on a "date" with a lady and tested their newly found heterosexuality? On the other hand, if it's suppression we are talking about, how long will it last? Until a few months or even days after they get married, thus wrecking some poor woman's (and maybe kids') life? We are talking about genetic make-up and, in my humble opinion, that cannot be altered. Healthy sexuality (of any orientation) is an essential part of us and I don't see how religion can step in and try to "fix what's wrong".

Mr F J Brincat

May 7th 2011, 12:02

Alfred Hili.

"Whatever sexual orientation one is born with, one can try to be holy and pure, and to keep clear of sexual sins."

So according to you anyone that does not share your sexual orientation is unholy and impure?

Mr Zachary Stewart

May 6th 2011, 16:25

They do have that right Alfred, and similarly, I have the right to tell them that they're wrong. That is how free speech works.

Ms Lara Pace

May 6th 2011, 17:28

Leaders have the right to define what goes against the public policy and public morality of a state... and general they should do so in a secular way always protecting and promoting minority rights. quoting the bible in a secular matter is not logical argument. Leave to God to do his job... but let the state promote minority rights

Mr Vincent Cassar

May 6th 2011, 17:58

With all due respect...how can you call this guy a religious leader? Mela issa kull minn jivvinta xi setta jissejjah religious leader? Come on...let's be serious for once. Years and years of research in psychology states clearly that it is unethical to push conversion therapy....simply because it does not work! You respect a person for what he/she is (i.e. a person with all his/her good and bad) and not for being gay, homosexual or whatever! How ridiculous can people with blind faith become!

Mr Michael Buhagiar

May 6th 2011, 18:34

Lara pace the state must be administered by the majorities and not by tiny minorities. Allahares qatt isehh dak li tixtieq int. Nigu tajjeb.

Mr F J Brincat

May 7th 2011, 12:04

"I believe all religious leaders have the right to define what is immoral and impure according to them"

Exactly according to them - their opinion. Just theirs.

Ms C. Dimech

May 6th 2011, 13:20

protesting IS a form of freedom of expression and please, do not mix lettuce with flatulance, divorce has nothing to do with this issue except that the freedom to divorce is ALSO a form of freedom of expression.

Michael Flaherty

May 6th 2011, 14:33

Sir, you could not be more wrong. What this church/sect/gathering is doing is outside of the limits of freedom of speech. The divorce people are not clamouring/implying in any way that anyone who does not agree is inferior; everyone is entitled to their opinion, and a referendum will solve the issue in a perfectly democratic way.

By manner of his deed, he basically stated that
a) homosexuality is inferior to heterosexuality (thus infringing on the right to equality)
b) is a personal choice, as if it were an optional vice like smoking (thus demeaning their orientation)
c) is an abomination in the eyes of god (thus incorrectly interpreting the holy writ, as well as assuming authority over homosexuals)

At least the first two of these constitute a very solid base for hate crime, on an equal footing with a person insulting another over his skin colour. So what if he does good things from time to time? Some of the world's greatest criminals are incredible philanthropists, yet this doesn't excuse their crimes, does it?

Sir, freedom of expression is only applicable as long as it does not infringe on another person's rights. Also, do you think that "Qeghdin Sew" is a mature manner that an adult should use in a comment on a national newspaper?

David Caruana

May 6th 2011, 14:48

Prosit John Vella, kompli itfa' l-gebel fuq saqajk u fuq saqajn il-knisja!

I agree with Mr.Alfred Dimech - Gordon Manche does NOT make part of the Roman Catholic church, but John Vella's comment puts everything back in the right perspective

Ms B Cassar

May 6th 2011, 12:33

You're right but it seems that rights here in malta are defended by the authorities only when those of illegal immigrants are broken. As regards to the other maltese people which include many gay persons, it doesn't matter how much of their rights are broken. That is not important for the authorities. I'm saying this not out of the usual argument against illegal immigrants etc but because I feel that the authorities do not care of the maltese as much as they care of foreigners and indeed maltese people's rights are treated everytime like rubbish. It has to be an illegal immigrant for example to trigger the condemnation of all the authorities. That makes news, but what happens to the maltese does not touch nobody's heart.

Riley Brookes

Mar 2nd, 19:45

Do your research; genetics has been disproven in this area.

Mr Zachary Stewart

May 6th 2011, 16:32

I disagree. The public defaming that he is receiving now, thanks to his own misguided bigotry, is punishment enough. Free expression is a two-way street.

Mr Ben Cassar

May 6th 2011, 20:42

Micheal Jakson did..,. if it was possible for him, how much more possible for God the all mighty the creator!!!???

Advert
Advert