Man awarded €90,000 compensation for damages in brawl
A man who was injured in a Paceville brawl in 1999, when he was hit on the head with a bottle, has been awarded over €90,000 in damages by Mr Justice Joseph Zammit McKeon in the First Hall of the Civil Court.
David Pace filed his writ for damages against Sheldon Falzon claiming that the latter was responsible for permanent injuries he had suffered.
The court heard that the two men had previously had a brawl in Blata l-Bajda. Some months later, on December 11, 1999, Mr Pace had gone to Paceville and had entered the Bamboo Bar after midnight. An argument developed between him and Mr Falzon and the security guards had to intervene.
Mr Falzon had broken a glass bottle and hit Mr Pace on the head with it. This version of events, as given by Mr Pace to the court was corroborated by another witness.
The court found Mr Pace's version of events credible and declared that Mr Falzon was responsible for the damages.
The court-appointed medical expert concluded that Mr Pace had suffered a 34 per cent permanent disability and the court ordered Mr Falzon to pay Mr Pace €91,781.77 in damages. Mr Pace suffered partial loss of vision in one eye and a loss of sensation in part of his face.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Jay Oatmon
May 3rd 2011, 15:44
I doubt any money would be forthcoming - I expect an appeal and then another 12 years of this 'not fit for purpose' courts system before a new judgement, and so on until the victim dies with nothing paid to him.
The malta courts delays are a disgrace, and a sick joke.
Mr Kevin Zammit
May 3rd 2011, 15:44
excellent news this. I am a firm believer that some people in Malta have little sense of taking responsibility for their actions. Jail does not reform or rarely does and for some strange reason not enough of a deterrent for Maltese (witness the countless brawls and macho attitude fueled by too much booze) but fat cash prizes may very well do the trick.
Mr Michael N Cassar
May 3rd 2011, 17:02
I note that with the sentence and crime that no assets were put under court custodian or frozen, this will always leave the victim under the mercy of the aggressor , I think its time to find a system where the state reinforce a better way for victims to be covered such as an obligatory loan which the aggressor have to pay a loan to a bank .
A. Borg
May 3rd 2011, 19:50
L-iktar jekk ma jahdiemx. Wahda fuq wahda se johodhom!
R. Gauci
May 3rd 2011, 22:18
F'kaz li ma jahdimx l-akkuzat ghandu jaghmilhom il-habs bil-Lm5 kuljum u bejn wiehed u iehor jammontaw ghal 22 sena habs, b'hekk il-lezzjoni tkun akbar.