Advert

Update 2: Immigrants rescued in AFM coordinated operation

Irregular migrants from Libya are this evening being rescued off Lampedusa, after they were reached by two Italian Guardia Costiera rescue-launches following a coordination operation handled by the Armed Forces of Malta.

Italian rescue co-ordination authorities in Rome notified Malta at around 9.15 a.m. that a boatload of migrants was located 42.4 nautical miles from Lampedusa, and 109.5 miles from Malta.

The AFM’s Rescue Co-ordination Centre established contact with the migrants via satellite-phone.

They said there were 170 females and 30 children among the group. Although they claimed that their boat was taking in water, they proceeded northwards to Lampedusa.

By the time the migrants’ boat was 37 nautical miles from Lampedusa late in the morning, Malta had already initiated rescue co-ordination efforts with the US Navy’s 6th Fleet headquarters in Naples, as well as other merchant vessel shipping in the area.

This was because Italian rescue assets were busy overnight with migrant boat rescue operations which obliged refuelling.

Concurrently, despite the severely bad weather in the area and the considerable distance from Malta, an AFM’s offshore patrol vessel set sail to the area.

Early in the afternoon, a NATO aircraft, having heard the AFM’s distress alert messages on marine radio, contacted Malta, and confirmed that the migrants’ boat was still afloat and heading north.

An AFM Islander was sent to the area, successfully locating the migrants’ 20-metre boat.

By late afternoon, two Italian Guardia Costiera rescue-launches out of Lampedusa were reported to Malta as heading to the migrants’ boat, with a third following.

As the AFM’s patrol boat continued steaming on its journey, the migrants were successfully intercepted by Italian rescuers some 19 miles away from Lampedusa, and they are now being escorted by Italian rescuers to port.

 

Advert

37 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Carmelo Aquilina

May 1st 2011, 08:43

@ Paul Chircop which all-white fantasy world do you happen to live in ?

Alfred Falzon

May 1st 2011, 09:48

@John Azzopardi
What logic is this?
Solidarity should remain the Maltese nation's hallmark!
The law of the jungle will never prevail over the great majority of the Maltese!
There is a way out, and that is cutting down to size despots who terrorize and butcher their unarmed civilians for daring to stand up to be counted!

Mr John Azzopoardi

May 2nd 2011, 01:06

Mr. Falzon what is your point. The law of the jungle is currently prevailing in Libya and more people are dying and given false hope. Don't you agree. I am firm believer that you go in and do the job quick. Nato does have the capability. If it didn't, then it should not have intervened. BEing in a war in Afghanistan is already straining resources.

Mr Anthony Borg

Apr 30th 2011, 18:11

Agree with you all the way Mr.Azzopardi.
- -
Why shouldn't the majority of the Maltese population have a voice on this issue!
The Illegal status of people arriving here "randomly" is as critical as the Divorce issue: on which our politicians ( in their great wisdom), have decided to wash their hands and hold a referendum.

We need leaders of stature to voice their concern and garner support from the people.
This speck of an Island belong to the People!

Mr Marco Cremona

Apr 30th 2011, 22:46

Mr. Azzopardi,

And what will your referendum question be then eh? Whether to let human beings drown? Whether we shall remain to be a part of the world or not?

What are you suggesting?

Mr Tony Camilleri

May 1st 2011, 00:13

Mr John Azzopoardi agree with you. The people must be consulted like they are being consulted on an issue of much lesser importance where our country and security is concerned.

Mr Carmelo Aquilina

May 1st 2011, 08:45

agree with Marco Cremona - here what decent country dliberates wheter or not to act in line with its civilised obligations under international treaties ?

Mr Anthony Borg

May 1st 2011, 16:11

@ Marco Cremona - if you can't swim, don't go bathing.

Mr John Azzopoardi

May 2nd 2011, 01:09

Mr Cremona, I think we all know what the question should be. It's in my comments. Cannot make it any more plain that it already is.

George Mifsud

May 2nd 2011, 10:52

@Mr. Azzopardi
Kont qieghed nahseb li nitlaq l-Awstralja u nigi Malta ghall kollox imma qieghed tghid li Malta "full up" mhemmx xi post fuq i-istaffa hux?

Other words what a load of ...

Mr Robert Callus

Apr 30th 2011, 17:20

1) You evaded my question. Do you agree with forking out $6.3 billion for Gaddafi to keep people in cages or not?

2) If Gaddafi did not kill the protesters before, it's for the simple reason that they were too afraid to protest - for 41 years. What is your logic? "I'm not a murderer because as long as they stay quiet and obey I won't kill them"? Sure, makes real sense

3) Yes, while asylum seekers are in detention their cases are processed - IN MALTA. If you think this was also the case in Gaddafi's Libya you are completely misinformed. Hopefully it will be different in post-Gaddafi Libya

Malcolm Farrugia

Apr 30th 2011, 16:28

Well said miss Vella

Mr Robert Callus

Apr 30th 2011, 14:07

So for you it was Ok for the Italian taxpayer to fork out $6.3 billion to the Colonel to keep these people in inhumane conditions? The first installments of which Gaddafi is using to kill his own people?

How much do you think the Maltese taxpayer should have paid if we were asked to share THAT burden?

Mr carlos ellul

Apr 30th 2011, 15:23

The Italian taxpayer had a moral duty to pay because of Italy's colonial past in Libya. They ended up being forced to pay because Gaddafi wouldn't have stopped sending immigrants to Europe unless they do so. There are nations who aren't entertained with a tin medal for 'gallantry' and a standing ovation in the former colonialist parliament.

Malcolm Farrugia

Apr 30th 2011, 16:27

@ Robert Callus, Yes it was a good deal for Malta, we paid nothing to the mad dog, and at the same time no illegals made it to our shores.

Mr Joe Spiteri

Apr 30th 2011, 13:44

Govt. will only hold a referendum on 'more important' issues such as divorce. To Dr.Gonzi & Co., immigration is not a serious threat to our country, and this has been proven time and again by the lack of sound initiatives to combat this problem.

Advert
Advert