Advert

Will fountain’s move sink the Tritons?

‘Like moving the lions in Trafalgar Square’

News that a Valletta landmark, the Tritons Fountain outside City Gate, is to be moved provoked mixed reactions yesterday with some organisations welcoming the idea but several people rubbishing the plan.

The area around what is now a grubby bus terminus will receive a €4 million facelift over the next few months to become a tree-lined, pedestrian-only zone, without Vincent Apap’s iconic fountain.

The fountain will be restored and moved a few metres away, next door to the MCP car park in the garden of the Air Force monument.

A further €500,000 will be spent to change the look of the façade of the government flats in Freedom Square opposite the site of the new Parliament. New wooden balconies and the original railings will replace the present stone balconies and balustrades.

Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt said the €4.5 million being spent to upgrade the area outside City Gate was over and above the €80 million being spent on the Renzo Piano project.

The idea presented yesterday is to create an open space, paved with hard stone complementing the new city entrance. A car park with space for 55 vehicles would also be created to one side.

The severe reaction online was not long in coming. “One man’s vision has been imposed on the nation,” wrote a Sean Grima, barely a few minutes after the story appeared online, presumably referring to Renzo Piano, the world-famous Italian architect responsible for revamping City Gate and building the new Parliament building and an open-air theatre on the Old Opera House ruins.

What followed built on these lines, reminiscent of the criticism of the open-air theatre. There were some who welcomed the idea but the feedback online was mostly negative.

Not so, however, from Din l-Art Ħelwa President Simone Mizzi. “I think the move, which is part of the Valletta embellishment project, is a positive one as it would better expose the entrance to Valletta and not cause a visual impairment. Regenerating the outside, not just the inside of Valletta, thus letting the bastions reign supreme, would be a big plus for Valletta,” she said.

Removing the fountain from where it stands might also expose the original counterguards of Valletta, which lie below the area, at the level of the moat, she said.

The change would also be good for the fountain which would no longer be exposed to further carbon dioxide. “It is in need of restoration after years of exposure to environmental hazards. When moved to its new allocated place it will not suffer further damage.” Ceramist Gabriel Caruana also welcomed the idea, even though in principle he does not believe monuments should be moved.

“The project (rebuilding City Gate) is a large and important one and once the entrance to Valletta is changing and moving then it should move too,” he said. Shifting the fountain towards the Phoenicia Hotel would create an open space in front of the entrance and it would not clash with other monuments.

The concept of an open space also appealed to Valletta mayor Alexei Dingli. He said it would actually elevate the fountain rather than demote it since it would not be used as a roundabout anymore. He actually went one step further, suggesting that a statue of Grand Master Jean de Valette should be considered in its stead.

Among the detractors online was painter and columnist Kenneth Zammit Tabona, who argued it was disrespectful to move such an iconic monument that had been designed by a modern Maltese artist to be erected in front of City Gate.

“It is unacceptable that instead of being respected as one of the most impressive Maltese and large bronze works of art, it’s being shifted to the side. It is absolute rubbish that it is being moved to clear the area of any visual impairment, as you can see the bastions from anywhere! The bastions are a defensive wall, not a work of art,” he said.

Mr Zammit Tabona, who had also voiced his criticism of the open-air design for the new theatre, stressed the role the monument plays in the collective memory.

“It has been there for years throughout all our childhood. It is bad enough that the Opera House ruins have not been replaced. What else are they going to remove? Shifting it would be like moving the lions in Trafalgar Square. Maltese people are proud of this monument, and the terrible state it is in is a shame on its own.”

He too, however, made a suggestion, arguing that the fountain could replace the War Memorial down the road, an obelisk, which could be shifted to where the Triton Fountain is being moved – in this way the fountain would maintain its dignity in front of Valletta.

The project announced yesterday complements the new €3.3 million bus terminus being built at St James Ditch and which is expected to be finished by July 3, when the new public transport operator takes over the bus service.

Dr Gatt said access to Valletta from the present terminus would be closed for two to three weeks. Shuttle minivans will provide transport around to Castille.

The City Gate project itself reaches another milestone next week when the demolition of the actual gate gets underway.

Advert

46 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

John A. Gauci

Apr 30th 2011, 21:20

In a way I think Mr. B. Fenech is right. After all it was Grand Master La Valette who builded Valletta. But please the fountain should be left where it is now. In other places such as Zabbar ,Zebbug and Qormi there are statues or buildings named after their respective builder.

Mr Joe Gatt

May 1st 2011, 02:22

Malta Film Facilities, could have manufactured a fibreglass replica of the old gate in no time, at fraction of costs.

Bus depot should have been sited at the MCP, roofed over of course, plus garden on top. Access could have been thru old railway tunnel next to the gate at `Bombi`. with moving walkways similar to those at International Airports, leading to the proposed park and ride ,sites, thus drastically reducing traffic thru Floriana, which then becomes mainly a pedestrian zone.

Freedom square site should have been embellished, with a subterranean parliament beneath

Mr B. Fenech

Apr 30th 2011, 16:10

Times Change..it is useless living in the past. Architecture changes too, you just have to be ready embrace what change brings.

Kenneth Galea

Apr 29th 2011, 22:56

I do not think you are using your common sense at all. Get real! Do you really believe that Malta's economy is on par with that of Greece or Portugal or even Spain? In any event this grand project is generating scores of jobs and the EU is funding it.
If you think the economy is in such a bad state in Malta, do us a favour and leave th island and settle for Greece.

Marco Meli

Apr 30th 2011, 12:00

Yes mr galea, i realy do believe that the economy is on par with that of greece , portugal and spain! An old maltese saying says ' thott bla ma trodt, is-swar thott". As regarding the EU funding this project (if you may call it a project after all) I have my doubts! Continue defending your goverment mr galea, you only have 2 yrs left! cheers

Mr george attard

Apr 29th 2011, 14:26

let us all HAIL piano and co.

Victor Pulis

Apr 29th 2011, 16:35

Renzo Piano would be insulted by your comment that it had to be him for us to get rid of the gabbanas!!
Talk about being open minded!

Rene Attard

Apr 29th 2011, 16:37

But why should a new line be created when the fountain is the end of another that has been there since the Knights built the Mall? Why change what is good? Why fix what's not broken?

John A. Gauci

Apr 30th 2011, 00:42

With reference to Mr. Jo Camm comment----- I would like to point out that one form of 'being funny' is that one does not accept criticism ! In a county like ours----every one has the right to express his/her opinion, whether he/she voted for the party in Government or not.

Victor Pulis

Apr 29th 2011, 16:38

Oh so a statue of Valletta's founder would make a great round about would it?

Mr Conrad Thake

Apr 29th 2011, 10:35

The new placement of the Tritons fountain will have an adverse visual impact on the RAF memorial.
The imposing and monumental scale of the Tritons fountain was originally concieved as a landmark along the main central axis of Valletta from City Gate to St Elmo. I fear that it will be misfit in its new location. The solitary presence of the RAF memorial (its setting albeit compromised by the public car park) will be lost. Its displacement also poses a logistical challenge.

That said it would be intriguing to try to expose the original foundations of the ravelin

The projected car-park marked E is also totally out of place. It is should be replaced by the trees as per its mirror image counterpart H. But I strongly suspect it is parking for the privileged few and would be retained in spite of all objections.

Mr W Cassar

Apr 29th 2011, 11:46

Spot on!

Mr John Apap

Apr 29th 2011, 22:19

Well said Mr Laiviera. I would never presume to give my wife advice on which body cream to use, so why should advice be given by somebody who has no clue. I always say 'horses for courses'

Advert
Advert