Genome advances propel cancer care

Genome-sequencing is getting cheaper and faster, and can eliminate the guesswork in treating cancer by offering personalised clues on how to best attack tumours, US doctors said yesterday.

The human genome was first sequenced in 2003, followed by the first cancer tumour in 2008, intriguing doctors with a new and unparalleled potential for targeting care.

However, controversy lingers over the ethical questions that arise as people begin to learn more about their genetic maps, from concerns over medical privacy to decisions about childbearing and scanning offspring for genetic flaws.

Two studies in the Journal of the American Medical Association detail how one patient’s genome led doctors to a different, life-saving leukaemia treatment, while a second patient died but left her three children with potentially valuable information about their genetic future.

The study authors said these cases offer hope that as technology gets cheaper and researchers build up more data about cancer and its various mutations, the oncology field will be transformed in the next five to 10 years.

What used to cost tens of millions of dollars and took months, now costs about $40,000 and can offer detailed results in about six weeks, said senior author Richard Wilson, director of Washington University’s Genome Institute.

“It has been very eye opening for me in the 10 years that I have been working on cancer genomics,” Dr Wilson said.

“We think about leukaemia or lung cancer or breast cancer as all sort of being the same disease across all patients, but that’s really not the way it is,” he said.

“It is a complex genetic disease... for the great majority of the cases you are going to want to know exactly what is going on in the genome to cause the disease in order to effectively treat it.”

One study centred on a 39-year-old woman who appeared to have classic case of acute promyelocytic leukemi, but lacked the usual genetic signs associated with it.

By sequencing the genome of the patient and her tumour and comparing them, doctors found she had an unusual genetic insertion of one chromosome into another, which mimicked the sort of cancer best tackled with chemotherapy instead of a risky bone marrow or stem cell transplant.

“Sequencing the genome of the patient’s leukemia cells offered the opportunity to resolve this dilemma in ‘real time’ and allowed us to make the correct call in recommending further therapy,” said the patient’s oncologist, Peter Westervelt at Washington University.

The patient came in with survival odds of less than 15 percent, received chemotherapy “and remains in remission 15 months after her diagnosis,” the study said. The second case involved a mother of three who was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 37, then developed ovarian cancer by age 39. She died at 42, after extensive chemotherapy and a recurrence of the ovarian tumour.