Nationalism comes of age in anti-immigrant, bailout Europe
April 13: Rescuers helping people after a boat carrying some 250 migrants from North Africa crashed into rocks as they tried to enter the port of Pantelleria, in the strait of Sicily. Photo: Francesco Malavolta/AFP
The arrival of the True Finns on Europe’s electoral map is just the latest in a spree of nationalist successes – a trend rooted in fears over immigration which has come of age with the economic crisis.
For analyst Jean-Dominique Giuliani of the Robert Schuman Foundation in Brussels, the EU’s task is easy. Europe must “accept controlled immigration, and concentrate now on integration”.
The eurosceptic party and its 48-year-old leader Timo Soini “should be seen in terms of a movement towards inward-looking nationalism, a populist wave which is sparing no one, even the most integrationist, successful economies,” analyst Jean-Dominique Giuliani of the Robert Schuman Foundation in Brussels said.
“This was a referendum on EU policy,” Mr Soini retorted bluntly after the dust settled.
“We will keep our money and our right to make our own decisions,” he insisted.
Not every nationalist in Europe is far-right.
Scotland, with a population the size of Finland, has been governed for the last four years by long-established centre-left nationalists – tipped by polls to strengthen their minority grip by winning a second, five-year term next month.
But that may be exceptional because the drift elsewhere seems clear. France’s Marine Le Pen has comfortably slipped into her notorious father Jean-Marie’s mantle as head of the far-right National Front.
A poll last month suggested she could take 20 per cent of votes and beat President Nicolas Sarkozy in the first round of the 2012 Presidential election if IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn runs on the Socialist ticket. In The Netherlands, Geert Wilders made his name with a blunt anti-immigrant film that compared the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, while far-right parties have influential roles in or backing minority governments in Italy and Denmark.
Heinz-Christian Strache – the darling of Austria’s far-right – records rap songs about his hatred of Muslim symbols in Europe or the Brussels machine.
Far-right figures also sit comfortably in Parliaments in Bulgaria, Latvia, Slovakia and Sweden.
Meanwhile, Flemish nationalists – spurred on by rivals in the outside-right lane – are itching for an excuse to break up Belgium.
In Hungary, conservative Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s policies are scaring Brussels liberals.
These include tough media curbs, a failure to stop extremist Jobbik party vigilantes rounding up Roma gypsies, and a Constitution, backed by lawmakers on Monday, containing references to the fatherland.
“European federalism was a beautiful idea, one I myself believed in,” Hungary’s foreign minister Janos Martonyi said recently.
But, he added: “it’s a fact that the concept of the nation-state has gained in strength and significance”.
“These are an amazing set of results, and prove conclusively that euroscepticism can win – and win big,” said Nigel Farage, Europe’s arch-critic of integration.
Head of the UK Independence Party, has secured a million votes in Britain’s 2010 general election and is a formal ally of Mr Soini in the European Parliament.
Just three per cent of Finland’s 5.3 million citizens are foreign, and its economy is exemplary.
One of only a handful of Triple-A credit-rated eurozone states, it has a disproportionately influential voice in EU economic debates.
Yet domestic fears the EU’s most northerly state – which reaches into the Arctic – could be over-run by Arab North Africans flooding in via Italy helped secure Mr Soini’s party a one-in-five vote from a high turnout.
Those concerns have fused perfectly with bailout fatigue after Greece, Ireland and Portugal each needed help.
1 Comment
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Martin Cassar
Apr 20th 2011, 23:56
Ms. Ashton , Mr. Sarkozy, Mr. Cameron and Mr. Obama are very much concerned and extra worried that any democratic election in Tunis or Egypt will bring extremists Islamists into power. Okay fair enough. Are our democratic leaders now worried because extremists Christians are in power?
Today we have many intellectually – bankrupted politicians and political parties with one-single-item-agenda either to fight immigrants or to remove Muslim immigrants out of Europe! Is this all what these potential leaders could think about? Are those politicians serious? Is the scaremongering of immigrants the only thing left to mobilize voters?
I thought that the Nazi era is over! I am not in a position to stop Nazism’s cancer to spread across Europe, but at least I would use my vote to fight Nazis. Please spread the word.
Do our leaders seriously think that our versions of both democracy and human rights are made of chocolate while of others is made of sh…t.?
The signs of Europe-self destruction and Europe’s evaporation and being marginalized in the international arena is happening in slow motion.
First time I lost faith in our model of democracy, was back in 2006 when the EU rejected the will of the Palestinian people and disapproved yet blacklisting democratically Hamas in Gaza. Few years later our leaders didn’t respect the will of the Irish people’s referendum result neither, and forced Ireland to go for another referendum as if noting has happened at the first one ( a typical Mr. Mugabi and Dr. Sant style democracy hihihihi)
Not long ago the Swiss have set a dangerous precedent by using Schengen rules as a political tool when the Swiss government blacklisted Col. Gaddafi along with members of his family.
Few months earlier, same Swiss government had set another dangerous precedent by putting HUMAN RIGHTS’ related matters into referendum (the ban of building of minarets issue).
Can we just envisage what would have been the ‘democratic’ west reaction if for instance Tunis, Iran or Egypt banned churches to have steeples as a result of a democratic referendum?
Would we still be approving the Tunisians, the Egyptian or the Iranian right of democracy? Would we still be siding with either the Iranian, the Tunisian or the Egyptian people? Would the EU keep mum? What would be the Vatican’s reaction? Would EU Human Rights apologists keep quite? I very much doubt!
Any way if what the Finnish did was a product of democracy, I would say no thanks; I don’t want this democracy as I equally disapprove a secular culture that produced Hitler.