Advert

Updated: Government urged to assume responsibility for 'irregular' Mepa appointment

Mepa chairman defends appointment

Environment director Petra Bianchi’s appointment without a call for applications was deemed irregular by Mepa auditor Joe Falzon. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

Environment director Petra Bianchi’s appointment without a call for applications was deemed irregular by Mepa auditor Joe Falzon. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

The Labour Party has called on the government to shoulder its responsibilities after the Mepa audit officer declared that the direct appointment of Petra Bianchi as the planning authority’s environment director without a public call for applications was irregular.

“The chairman is, with the board, jointly responsible for this as he took it upon himself to select and appoint the person on the basis of unknown criteria and did not follow the proper procedures as established by law,” audit officer Joe Falzon said.

Malta Environment and Planning Authority chairman Austin Walker rejected the conclusions  and justified the head-hunting exercise, adding it was a faster process than a public call for applications.

However the Labour Party in a statement signed by Roderick Galdes, said it had always insisted that the manner of the appointment was wrong and lacked transparency.

Mr Galdes, a member of the Mepa board noinated by the PL, said he had voted against the appointment because it lacked transparency. The head-hunting exercise, he said, had taken place with the approval of the prime minister.

The post of Director of the Environment was never considered to be a political appointment, he said. The government, therefore, should shoulder political responsibility for what had taken place.

Mr Walker in comments to The Times this morning argued that the post was a position of trust and the law allowed for such appointments to be made in these cases.

Dr Bianchi was appointed head of Mepa’s Environment Protection Department in February to succeed the outgoing Martin Seychell. She is the former director of heritage group Din l-Art Ħelwa.

Her appointment was approved by the Mepa board with eight votes in favour and one against on February 4 after she was hand-picked by Mr Walker. No call for applications was issued.

In its report, the authority’s Audit Office said it received a complaint from veteran environmentalist Edward Mallia over the method used to appoint Dr Bianchi.

On February 8, Mr Falzon asked the authority for more information on the appointment, which he received 10 days later.

However, Mr Falzon noted that Mepa only asked the Employment and Training Corporation for clearance on February 15 after the appointment was made.

Mr Falzon said it was “very unusual” that the selection process had been completed and the person appointed before authorisation from the Employment and Training Corporation was obtained.

However, he added, the ETC did not delve into whether Mepa’s assertion that the post was a position of trust was justified but it simply stated that the onus of responsibility for such a decision lay with the authority.

Minutes of the board meetings where Dr Bianchi’s appointment was discussed reveal that no discussion was held on her qualifications or suitability for the job.

One board member asked why no call for applications had been made and Mr Walker is quoted saying that the position of director was one of trust and outside the remit of the collective agreement.

“The process of employment through a call is lengthy and the authority stands to lose if the post is left vacant for a long time,” Mr Walker told the board.

This line of defence was repeated in Mr Walker’s reaction annexed to the auditor’s report. The chairman noted that three years elapsed before Dr Bianchi’s predecessor had been appointed after numerous calls for application did not yield satisfactory results.

“Recruitment through headhunting as a general rule can lead to identifying and engaging a suitable candidate within shorter time-frames,” Mr Walker said.

However, the auditor criticised this reasoning, insisting Mepa was not a private company.

“The way the post has been filled is a very dangerous precedent which can have undesirable effects including using it as means to exclude persons on political beliefs, sexual orientation, gender... and does not necessarily result in the best person being appointed because head hunting is limited to the people known to the person making the appointment.”

Mr Falzon said it was not the function of his office to judge Dr Bianchi’s qualifications but insisted it was neither the prerogative of the chairman.

The outgoing environment director was also quoted in the minutes saying that, with a public call, EPD employees who would have applied for the post were likely to be disappointed.

In a similar argument to justify his decision, Mr Walker told the audit office that from experience “public calls also frequently give rise to claims of discrimination”.

Mr Falzon rebutted this argument, insisting this was only true if a call for applications was worded to unreasonably favour particular candidates.

His criticism did not end there and in a “personal remark”, which he described as irrelevant to the contents of the report, Mr Falzon said he failed to understand why the environment protection director should have experience working with non-governmental organisations.

“Indeed, I would find this a handicap as accusations can easily be levelled that the particular person is favouring a particular NGO against another,” Mr Falzon said.

The auditor also highlighted relevant sections of the Public Administration Act which were not yet in force that showed how the legislator did not intend to make distinctions between positions of special trust and other posts.

While the auditor insisted this obliged Mepa to appoint people to positions of trust after a competitive process, Mr Walker insisted the law was not yet in force and Mepa had no obligation whatsoever.

The report was vetted by a legal adviser from the Ombudsman’s office.

Dr Bianchi was appointed for four years with a one-year probationary period.

Advert

27 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joseph Vassallo

Apr 20th 2011, 23:23

Mr Farrugia, it seems your good self does not mind pontificating when it comes to expressing YOUR opinion.

I have to read your "I wish to point out" as "In my opinion" and your "how righteaous (sic) he is" as "how righteous I perceive him to be". He may well be the "best-suited" (depends where he buys his attire) holder of that office and even a "no non-sense (sic) individual", but that does not make others who potentially disagree with your perception "busy bodies (sic) grumblers and chatter-boxes (sic)". A CPAA qualification is about as relevant, consonant and harmonic with environmental planning as it would be in an operating theatre.

He is obviously good at getting things done because he doesn't mind sticking his neck out to purposefully navigate around legislation intended to guard precisely against adventures of this nature; and that is why he is not, in this instance, being seen as a good administrator by so many.

Hence my question on whether he was appointed after the position was advertised or whether he was installed by some authoritarian equally capable of getting things done.

Mr Michael Buhagiar

Apr 20th 2011, 11:36

what's a pastiche for you is art for others.

Mr Michael Buhagiar

Apr 20th 2011, 11:38

mr zammit because the previous manager just walked out of his job after all hell broke loose against him in the gozo debacle. what is MEPA to do? Sit on it and wait for the beuraucracy calls for applications to be issued? Instead of being pro active you want MEPA to remain idle and being lambasted by your ilk for not doing anything for the Environment.

Mr Patrick Zammit

Apr 20th 2011, 12:50

MB
If that was the case, why didn’t Mepa appoint a temp to the post until the correct procedure (issuing a call) took its time instead of directly appointing a person for a 4 year period?

Mr john vella

Apr 20th 2011, 15:34

Michael you said it. Yes Sir, we the people deserve more from MEPA. Is it true that 'HIGH RADIOACTIVITY LEVELS was found in coal ash in Benghaisa? Under tests it contained K40, PB212 and PB214. This is why we the people have MEPA and it must not be idle. Why the report has not been published, let us be aware of danger if danger there is? Otherwise irregular appointments are wrong and should not be defended.

Joseph Vassallo

Apr 20th 2011, 11:18

Did Mr Walker himself apply for his position or was he head-hunted by his minister? I am pretty sure that there were other sources of recruitment from within who were capable of leading this government agency.

But I do believe this was the same minister who shoots first and asks questions later because he gets things done; after all, everyone can plead good faith when in fact they are being disingenuous.

Joseph Vassallo

Apr 20th 2011, 11:41

Was Mr Walker's position advertised before he was appointed or was he himself head-hunted by the MRA?

Rules are there to be bent or broken... or so it seems.

Mr Michael Buhagiar

Apr 20th 2011, 11:43

you will surely wake up come next election. I only hope it wont be like what happened during the last elections when party supporters went running wild with joy around Malta, only to discover that they were taken for a ride by their own irresponsible and immature leadership.

Mr john vella

Apr 20th 2011, 15:15

Thanks Michael Buhagiar! Memories oh! memories how true, we all hoped for a change but for a handful of votes more, GonziPN came to power. I guess we should celebrate 3 years of GonziPN, his latest 600 euro increase and the rest .77 cents a week, do not forget one of your minister qualifying us as 'gahan mati'. After three years of: 'Work investing in a healthier society' (front cover of the detailed version, National document issued by the Office of the Prime Minister and delivered to every household. I hope we see your like celebrating, especially if you got an irregular appointment (sound familiar). Myself I still hope to wake up come next election as the opposition is no where to be found!

Advert
Advert