Advert

Muscat expects government reaction on Karin Grech appeal judgement

Karin Grech had been killed when she opened a letter bomb addressed to her father Edwin.

Karin Grech had been killed when she opened a letter bomb addressed to her father Edwin.

The Labour leader expects the government to react to the recent decision by the Court of Appeal to uphold Karin Grech's judgment which confirmed a previous judgment which had awarded her father Edwin Grech €420,000 in damages for the fatal bombing.

15-year-old Karin, had opened a large brown envelope addressed to her father which contained a pen-box shaped parcel in Christmas wrapping. It exploded in her hands.

She died in hospital while her brother, who had been standing close to her, had to be operated upon. The murder took place on December 28, 1977.

The First Hall of the Civil Court last year established the motive behind the bomb as being her father's services to the government during the politically sensitive period.

The government filed an appeal arguing that while it was not contesting the actual sum awarded as compensation it was appealing the "general suspicion" that the motive behind the bomb was her father's work.

The government argued that the court could not make such a declaration when the case had not even been solved.

In their recent judgment, Acting Chief Justice Geoffrey Valenzia, Mr Justice Giannino Caruana Demajo and Mr Justice Tonio Mallia, in the Constitutional Court, said that once the government had accepted to pay damages during the course of the appeal, then it inferred that it accepted the original judgment and the reasoning behind the award of the damages as they were intrinsically linked.

Dr Muscat said yesterday that it was cabinet which had decided to appeal the Court's Decision, which had now been confirmed.

In other countries, such a decision would have led to a minister tendering his resignation.

Advert

9 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Carmel (Nenu) Aquilina

Apr 16th 2011, 21:39

@Sur Piscopo, mela vera li kif jgħid il-Malti li l-verita tweġġha.
Jien xorta nipqa nisħaq li s-snin tmenin u s-snin tas-sebgħinijiet huma l-għar żmien tal-poplu Malti.
U din hi l-verita li tweġġha, u li ma tistgħux tħasru mill-istorja ta' Malta!
Taf minn jinsulta l-inteliġenza tal-poplu Malt Sur Piscopo,. Minn iżomm mat-Taljani għan-nuqqas ta' solidarjeta li urew mal-glandestini u maqdar l-awtoritajiet Maltin għas-solidarjeta u l-ħniena li urew mal-glandestini li salvaw mill-għarja.

Għalhek poplu Malti għandek tkun dejjem attent u tinsa xejn minn dak kollu li qed jgħidu dawn in-nies u l-passat ikraħ tal-gvernijiet Lauristi tagħhom, għax jekk tavda il-wied minn fejn għadda jerġa jgħaddi!

Mr Simon Bonello

Apr 16th 2011, 22:57

@ Mr. Aquilina... anzi darba kien hemm gharef li qalilna fuq il fosos waqt mass meeting li jekk jitla hu jaf u ha jikxef lil min qatila lil din il- povra tifla... forsi nsejt Nen?

Advert
Advert