Advert

Pre-feasibility study on Gozo tunnel proposal

The missing link... Is building a road under the seabed feasible? Photo shows the Gozo ferry terminal at Ċirkewwa. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

The missing link... Is building a road under the seabed feasible? Photo shows the Gozo ferry terminal at Ċirkewwa. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

A pre-feasibility study has been commissioned on the proposed subsea tunnel between Malta and Gozo, which could be co-financed by the EU.

Transport Malta said it had “verbal confirmation” that the tunnel link between the islands would form part of the European Commission’s Ten-T, Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency, and, therefore – “in theory” – would be eligible for EU co-financing under the Cohesion Fund.

It has been estimated that the construction of the three-lane tunnel across the channel – a proposal thrust into the limelight by Parliamentary Secretary Chris Said about two months ago – would cost €150 million.

But whether the idea of the permanent connection, which has been in the pipeline for decades, would take off has yet to be established and depends on the outcome of studies.

The pre-feasibility study would involve a high-level assessment before more detailed feasibility studies and should be completed towards the end of the year, TM said.

It is aimed at assessing the technical and economic feasibility of constructing a subsea road tunnel between Malta and Gozo but will not involve detailed geotechnical investigations, which are normally carried out at full-feasibility-study stage.

It would examine environmental issues, identify possible tunnel routing alignments and estimate costs of infrastructure and equipment, required in accordance with EU regulations on Ten-T tunnel safety, the transport regulator said.

The plan is for technical expertise to be provided through the Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions, Jaspers, which helped in the preparation of major projects submitted for grant financing under the Structural and Cohesion Funds, TM said.

As for the next step after the pre-feasibility study was completed, it said “a decision would be taken, following consideration of the results”.

Dr Said, whose role was to get the ball rolling, said he was “satisfied” the process had started. He had stepped up the momentum when he called on the government to commission a financial and technical assessment of the project in February and maintained the tunnel was the “best solution”.

There was no need to rush things and carry out a study for the sake of it, he said, insisting what counted was that it was “good” and that nobody dragged their feet.

Asked why there was need for a pre-feasibility study before ­carrying out a study, Dr Said explained that establishing sensible, expert and comprehensive terms of ­reference was just as important.

Since the subject of an underwater connection between the islands surfaced, sparking a controversy between those who believe it is sorely needed, primarily Gozitans, and those who oppose it, specific subcommittees have been set up.

Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt said yesterday the pre-feasibility study would be undertaken at the beginning of summer for “a good idea on whether it is worth exploring any further, or dropping it”.

The government was not waiting for the tunnel and the sea passenger terminal in Ċirkewwa was being developed to the tune of €12 million.

Advert

10 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Christian Sciberras

Apr 13th 2011, 22:58

Yeah, such as building gardens and facelifting Valletta?

Why don't you come live in Gozo for a while and see the damage you Maltese did that will stay for ages.

Many investment in Gozo has been doomed just because there's a huge disconnection between the main land, something which most Maltese are too egoistic or downright narrow minded to think about.

Mr John Micallef

Apr 13th 2011, 13:57

10 points to Daniela Klein. Pity that this is no joke.

I wonder whether the Govt would revert to a referendum? Or has he got the mandate to waste public money just like that?

For all those getting really excited that this might be partly funded by the EU - that still makes it our money, because we worked to join the EU and we are working hard to remain in the EU, so how the Governemnt spends EU funds is our business.

Oh...but I've forgotten...this is a Government made up of The Enlightened Few who obvioulsy seem to know more about everything than the rest of us.

Stanley Vassallo

Apr 13th 2011, 14:31

Good one. I like your realism.

Christian Sciberras

Nov 4th 2011, 09:58

Stanley Vassallo - Realism? Realism is the absolute proof Rome never existed. Realism proves Greek architecture didn't move past wooden huts. Realism...well you get the drift.

Christian Sciberras

Apr 13th 2011, 12:13

I don't see this as a concern considering it would be managed by an international private corporation (as hinted in the article), instead of TransportMalta.

Charles Sammut

Apr 13th 2011, 14:49

Road building and repairs are also carried out by private enterprises and look at the abyssmal standard. It is either gross incompetence or corruption because most of the work done should be rejected forthwith.

Christian Sciberras

Apr 13th 2011, 22:51

But they're anything but foreign companies. Local companies are just a bit less incompetent than the government. Take the MIA for example.

Advert
Advert