Pre-feasibility study on Gozo tunnel proposal
The missing link... Is building a road under the seabed feasible? Photo shows the Gozo ferry terminal at Ċirkewwa. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier
A pre-feasibility study has been commissioned on the proposed subsea tunnel between Malta and Gozo, which could be co-financed by the EU.
Transport Malta said it had “verbal confirmation” that the tunnel link between the islands would form part of the European Commission’s Ten-T, Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency, and, therefore – “in theory” – would be eligible for EU co-financing under the Cohesion Fund.
It has been estimated that the construction of the three-lane tunnel across the channel – a proposal thrust into the limelight by Parliamentary Secretary Chris Said about two months ago – would cost €150 million.
But whether the idea of the permanent connection, which has been in the pipeline for decades, would take off has yet to be established and depends on the outcome of studies.
The pre-feasibility study would involve a high-level assessment before more detailed feasibility studies and should be completed towards the end of the year, TM said.
It is aimed at assessing the technical and economic feasibility of constructing a subsea road tunnel between Malta and Gozo but will not involve detailed geotechnical investigations, which are normally carried out at full-feasibility-study stage.
It would examine environmental issues, identify possible tunnel routing alignments and estimate costs of infrastructure and equipment, required in accordance with EU regulations on Ten-T tunnel safety, the transport regulator said.
The plan is for technical expertise to be provided through the Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions, Jaspers, which helped in the preparation of major projects submitted for grant financing under the Structural and Cohesion Funds, TM said.
As for the next step after the pre-feasibility study was completed, it said “a decision would be taken, following consideration of the results”.
Dr Said, whose role was to get the ball rolling, said he was “satisfied” the process had started. He had stepped up the momentum when he called on the government to commission a financial and technical assessment of the project in February and maintained the tunnel was the “best solution”.
There was no need to rush things and carry out a study for the sake of it, he said, insisting what counted was that it was “good” and that nobody dragged their feet.
Asked why there was need for a pre-feasibility study before carrying out a study, Dr Said explained that establishing sensible, expert and comprehensive terms of reference was just as important.
Since the subject of an underwater connection between the islands surfaced, sparking a controversy between those who believe it is sorely needed, primarily Gozitans, and those who oppose it, specific subcommittees have been set up.
Infrastructure Minister Austin Gatt said yesterday the pre-feasibility study would be undertaken at the beginning of summer for “a good idea on whether it is worth exploring any further, or dropping it”.
The government was not waiting for the tunnel and the sea passenger terminal in Ċirkewwa was being developed to the tune of €12 million.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Marco Cremona
Apr 13th 2011, 13:51
What a waste of the taxpayers' money?
We've already had Ministers' and Prime Ministers' pipe dreams suggested in the past, and we spent hundreds of thousands of Euro in useless studies only to find out what we already knew. That they don't work.
Does anybody remember the Prime Minister's 'Malta needs 3 golf courses' project? Thousands of Euro were spent to tell us what we already knew - that gold courses don't work in Malta. Does anybody recall ex-Minister Ninu Zammit saying that a stormwater project that will collect and re-use all of Malta's stormwater will cost Euro 50 million? Well the final calculation went up to Euro 428 million and the project went down the drain (as will the rainwater).
This Gozo-tunnel idea is nothing but Mr. Said's idea of boosting his popularity at the polls at the taxpayers' expense. Bin the idea immediately! The country has other more important priorities than to study I have a dream' projects.
Christian Sciberras
Apr 13th 2011, 22:58
Yeah, such as building gardens and facelifting Valletta?
Why don't you come live in Gozo for a while and see the damage you Maltese did that will stay for ages.
Many investment in Gozo has been doomed just because there's a huge disconnection between the main land, something which most Maltese are too egoistic or downright narrow minded to think about.
Daniela Klein
Apr 13th 2011, 12:47
L-ewwel ta' April ghadda ghal min ma jafx ;)
Mr John Micallef
Apr 13th 2011, 13:57
10 points to Daniela Klein. Pity that this is no joke.
I wonder whether the Govt would revert to a referendum? Or has he got the mandate to waste public money just like that?
For all those getting really excited that this might be partly funded by the EU - that still makes it our money, because we worked to join the EU and we are working hard to remain in the EU, so how the Governemnt spends EU funds is our business.
Oh...but I've forgotten...this is a Government made up of The Enlightened Few who obvioulsy seem to know more about everything than the rest of us.
Stanley Vassallo
Apr 13th 2011, 14:31
Good one. I like your realism.
Christian Sciberras
Nov 4th 2011, 09:58
Stanley Vassallo - Realism? Realism is the absolute proof Rome never existed. Realism proves Greek architecture didn't move past wooden huts. Realism...well you get the drift.
Mr Joseph Campbell
Apr 13th 2011, 11:49
One of the biggest problems i think it would be that oil might come up while digging if not but for sure water drip will start coming down as one of the last tunnels made is still leaking water and we did not have any rain for more than 2 months so it must be pipe water and we keep paying all those high bills for water
Christian Sciberras
Apr 13th 2011, 12:13
I don't see this as a concern considering it would be managed by an international private corporation (as hinted in the article), instead of TransportMalta.
Charles Sammut
Apr 13th 2011, 14:49
Road building and repairs are also carried out by private enterprises and look at the abyssmal standard. It is either gross incompetence or corruption because most of the work done should be rejected forthwith.
Christian Sciberras
Apr 13th 2011, 22:51
But they're anything but foreign companies. Local companies are just a bit less incompetent than the government. Take the MIA for example.