Libyan rebels reject ceasefire proposals
A demonstration outside the hotel where a meeting with the African Union was held.
Libyan rebels have rejected a cease-fire deal accepted by Muammar Gaddafi because it did not involve him stepping down.
The proposal was presented by an African Union delegation to the rebels' council in Benghazi today after they had met Gaddafi.
But council head Mustafa Abdel-Jalil, the country's former justice minister, said the initiative "did not respond to the aspirations of the Libyan people."
He added that the AU proposal did not discuss Gaddafi's removal or that of his powerful sons and instead only involved political reforms.
He added that the rebels would "not negotiate on the blood of our martyrs."
After getting apparent agreement with the dictator, the African Union delegation took its proposal to the rebels' eastern stronghold but was met with protests by crowds opposed to any peace until Gaddafi gives up power.
More than 1,000 people waved the pre-Gaddafi flags that have come to symbolise the rebel movement and chanted slogans outside a Benghazi hotel. They said they had little faith in the visiting African Union mediators, most of them allies of Gaddafi who are preaching democracy for Libya but do not practice it at home.
The negotiators met Gaddafi late yesterday in the capital, Tripoli, and said he accepted their proposal for a cease-fire with the rebels that would also include a halt to the three-week-old international campaign of airstrikes.
However, an Algerian representative of the delegation was vague on whether the proposal includes a demand for Gaddafi to give up power and would only say that the option was discussed.
The protesters in Benghazi and the opposition leadership based in the city are demanding that Gaddafi step down immediately.
"On the issue of Gaddafi and his sons, there is no negotiation," said Ahmed al-Adbor, a member of the opposition's transitional ruling council.
Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini supported that position.
"The sons and the family of Gaddafi cannot participate in the political future of Libya," he said, adding that Gaddafi's departure would have to happen "in parallel" with any cease-fire.
He said he was lobbying allies to arm the rebels but that he was against expanding the international operation to include ground forces.
A few hours after the AU announcement in Tripoli, Gaddafi's forces began bombarding the port in the Mediterranean city of Misrata, the only major city in the western half of Libya that remains under partial rebel control. Fierce fighting has raged there for weeks.
A doctor there said the shelling began overnight and continued intermittently throughout the day. He said six people were killed in residential areas.
Gaddafi has not kept a cease-fire he immediately declared after international airstrikes were authorised last month. He has also rejected demands from the rebels, the United States and its European allies that he relinquish power immediately.
After the talks with Gaddafi late Sunday, the AU delegation said he accepted their "road map" for a cease-fire.
The secretary general of Nato, which took over control of the air operation from the US, said that any cease-fire must be credible and verifiable.
"There can be no solely military solution to the crisis in Libya," Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. "Nato welcomes all contributions to the broad international effort to stop the violence against the civilian population."
Nato airstrikes largely stopped heavy shelling by government forces of the eastern city of Ajdabiya - a critical gateway to Benghazi, the opposition's de facto capital and Libya's second largest city.
Rebels held positions at the western gates of the city, on the fringes of desert littered with bullet casings, scraps of metal and more than a dozen blackened or overturned vehicles, including tanks and pickup trucks outfitted with anti-aircraft guns.
Gaddafi enjoys substantial support from countries of the AU, an organisation that he chaired two years ago and helped transform using Libya's oil wealth.
Although the AU has condemned attacks on civilians, last week its current leader, Equatorial Guinea President Teodoro Obiang Nguema, decried foreign intervention in Libya's nearly two-month-old uprising, which he declared to be an internal problem.
1 Comment
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Alfred Farrugia
Apr 11th 2011, 23:22
Given the rigid and intransigent position of the Libyan opposition and the rebels after the African Union’s mediation effort, have the UN and NATO considered that their action is bordering on a “coup d’etat” in Libya?
Which Article in the UN Charter supports the siding with a “rebel group” instead of impartiality? Why has UN Security Council Resolution 1973 been adopted without the “affirmative vote” of two permanent members – China and the Russian Federation – as requested by Article 27.3 of the UN Charter? The UN Secretary General is failing miserably in his responsibilities by allowing some members of the Security Council to indulge in a free for all instead of "maintaining international peace and security". When some members of the Security Council took unilateral action in the past, the UN became irrelevant. Now, the UN is becoming an accomplice!
The United Nations was established “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war” not to participate in or lead wars!
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/preamble.shtml