Advert

Absence of lawyer violated arrested person's rights

The Constiuttional Court of Appeal has confirmed a judgement which found that the rights of an arrested person were violated when he was not assisted by a lawyer during police interrogation.

The case was filed by Alvin Privitera and the original case was decided by the Constitutional Court in October 2010.

Mr Privitera, then 18 years old, had been arraigned on drug charges in April 2009 but his lawyer, Franco Debono, challenged the fact that his client was denied access to a lawyer, insisting it was breach of his right to a fair hearing.

Mr Privitera had been arrested in his home in Fgura in April 2007 and was immediately interrogated. The questioning continued at Police General Headquarters, in Floriana, and took a number of sessions. But at no point was Mr Privitera assisted by a lawyer.

The first court had commented on the fact that the teenager had been subjected to a strip search in his home in the presence of a number of police officers, arguing that the situation left such an impression on him it appeared he had, as a consequence, made a statement to the police.

It also pointed out that Mr Privitera was left in a holding cell for 17 hours when he was taken to police headquarters before he was interrogated, without him being given an explanation for his arrest or told about the seriousness of the charges being brought against him.

Mr Privitera’s statement to the police, the court said, had to be considered in the light of these facts and also the fact that this had been his first encounter with the police. The court ruled that case law of the European Court of Human Rights had established that the right to a fair hearing required that the accused be given the benefit of the assistance of a lawyer, even at the initial stages of police interrogation. The lack of such assistance would constitute a restriction of the defence rights of the accused.

At the time of Mr Privitera’s arrest, Maltese law made no provision for an accused person to be assisted by a lawyer during police interrogation. The position changed with the enactment of a legal notice earlier this year giving the arrested person access to a lawyer.

The accused was assisted by Dr Debono and Charmaine Charret.

Advert

8 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

A. Saliba

Apr 11th 2011, 15:24

The ECHR is not in any way linked to the European Union, but to the Council of Europe. The European Convention has been part and parcel of Maltese domestic law since 1987.

K Barbara

Apr 11th 2011, 16:00

Dominic Chircop qed thallat il-hass mal-qara baghli. il-European Court of Human Rights m'ghandu x'jaqsam xejn mal-Unjoni Ewropea. Mhux ahjar tkun taf id-differenza qabel titkellem?

Paul Barrett

Apr 11th 2011, 14:53

Yes, you are right in that having access to a lawyer does not help the Police obtain a confession and as far as I have so far gathered, the accused is only allowed to consult with a lawyer but still is not allowed to have the lawyer present whilst being questioned.

There are arguments for and against having a lawyer present. It, along with recorded/video interviews, would go a long way to prevent accusations of mistreatment or undue pressure being applied on a gullible (but perhaps innocent) accused. It may also be that a lawyer may advise the accused that it would be in his/her interest to plead guilty with perhaps a plea in mitigation (if in fact the evidence clearly points out that he/she is guilty) rather than aggravate the situation and increase the potential sentence (and costs).

j borg

Apr 11th 2011, 14:57

I don't believe your comments.... In our constitution everyone is assumed innocent until proven guilty. How can you in 2011 allow the police to interrogate or strip search anybody without assistance of his or her lawyer. This law is there to protect each individuals rights and also see that the police do not mistreat the arrested person.

I don't know how old you are but if you look into our history books Malta has had a number of crimes committed by the police including the EX Commissioner of Police (Pullicino).

michael scIcluna

Apr 11th 2011, 15:09

so why have laws if the people paid to see they are upheld dont even obey them? hope more of these cases see light because i think that most people would be scared to take a case against the police further..........

Advert
Advert