Parties argue on young people made ineligible to vote...while they agree on alternative system
UPDATED - While the political parties argued this week about how at least 2,800 young people will not be able to vote in the referendum because their 18th birthday came after the publication of the October electoral register, it was revealed today that the political parties already agree on an alternative system which will prevent this sort of situation.
Nationalist MP Beppe Fenech Adami said this morning that in the meetings of the Select Committee for Democratic Change he had proposed a system for a rolling electoral register - a system which would have provided for ongoing updating of the register and prevented the current controversy where 2,800 young people will not be able to vote in the divorce referendum because their birthday came after the publication of the electoral register.
Progress had been made on the proposal, he said, but then the Opposition walked out of the committee and everything stopped. He said that another proposal made to the committee would have avoided the current situation where people were sometimes taken to polling stations on stretchers.
Dr Fenech Adami was speaking on the Radio Malta programme Ghandi Xi Nghid. The Opposition walked out of the committee last year in protest over a decision taken by the Speaker in Parliament following a vote on power tariffs.
Labour MP Evarist Bartolo said the government had shown lack of commitment for progress in the select committee.
"The committee was moribund" he said, adding that progress on amendments to the electoral law could have still been made in further talks also involving (Labour MP) Michael Falzon.
Referring to the current controversy, Dr Fenech Adami said the proposal for the Electoral Commission to delay publication of the President's writ for the holding fo the referendum to beyond the electoral register publication cut-off date was undemocratic.
He also pointed out that fewer young people would miss voting in the referendum than at the last general election.
LABOUR PARTY AGREES
In a reaction, Labour Party spokesman Michael Falzon said that everybody agreed with the proposal to have a rolling register. There was also agreement on other proposals to make it easier for eligible voters to exercise their right to vote.
He said the PN, however, had opposed various PL proposals, particularly on voting at St Vincent de Paule Home for the Elderly, which would have made it easier for the people there to vote.
Dr Falzon said it was the government which had 'killed off' the select committee by not convening meetings for many months, to the extent that Labour MPs speaking in Parliament had called for meetings to be held.
He also pointed out that the number of 2,800 young people who cannot vote in the referendum only included those young people whose birthday fell between the publication of the October register and the cut-off date for the publication of the April register. There will be more who will not be eligible to vote despite turning 18 by the time the referendum is held on May 28.
(The October electoral register is to be used for the referendum since the President's writ for the holding of the referendum was issued before the publication of the April register).
AD CALLS FOR CHANGE
In a press conference this morning, Michael Briguglio, AD chairman, balmed both political parties in parliament for the fact that 2,800 young people cannot vote.
"Not only have they devised legislation which excludes other political parties and movements from the referendum electoral process, but they are also both to blame for the exclusion of 2,800 18 year old voters from the forthcoming divorce referendum. Instead of blaming each other both parties should reach parliamentary consensus to allow these voters to exercise the basic right to vote".
Dirk Urpani, AD spokesman for Youth and Sports, said: " Instead of fighting over how to prevent 2,800 young people from voting, our Government should be seeking to introduce the 16+ vote so that this democracy can be more representative. In itself, the fact that some people who will not be entitled to vote will be 18 years and 8 months old clearly shows that Malta's electoral system requires change".
13 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
E Gatt
Apr 9th 2011, 16:32
What about dealing with the issue (the ever increasing number) of voters living away from Malta?
When will Labour agree to allow these people to exercise their right without flying over to Malta on election day?
Peter Korsten
Apr 10th 2011, 22:00
For some obscure reason, people living abroad tend to vote more conservatively than the 'average' voter. The same is the case for the Netherlands. I happily vote in Dutch national elections by mail (unfortunately, the experiment via the internet was not repeated), and most of my expatriate compatriots that vote are a small, but potentially valuable group of voters. Perhaps, if Maltese could vote via mail, a larger percentage would vote PN? I honestly couldn't say.
D. A . Agius
Apr 9th 2011, 14:29
It's a simple issue... the 2,800 voters would most probably have a greater percentage of "Yes" votes, so this way one continues to work against a possible Yes vote.
Gaffe or not, does the PN want these people to vote? I'm pretty convinced it's a fat NO WAY so as to make sure this lie goes on, if possible, forever.
margaret richards
Apr 9th 2011, 13:44
A bit too late in the day now for rolling electoral register - 2800 votes are going to be lost!! Just a question to both parties - had this issue not been a social issue - but a general election - would both parties have acted in the same way??? Food for thought!!!
MBorg
Apr 9th 2011, 13:56
Yes, they would have. This is not somthing new. There is always a cut off date for elections or referenda. Some are always left out. This time it was the turnof these 2800 young people.
m busuttil
Apr 9th 2011, 15:55
forget what both parties are saying.
forget all the accusation and excuses that are being made.
we are more interested in what these new voters think about this latest twist in Maltese politics, and how all this will influence future voting
Raymond Farrugia
Apr 9th 2011, 13:20
Political convenience before individual rights; and this for both parties.
J. Borg
Apr 9th 2011, 12:25
...The committee was moribund...
How how very convenient for both the PN and the PL
Both parties and their stalwarts claim that they do sacrifices to work for the national interest...
as if there was ever a BIGGER & FATTER LIE!
Rocco Cauchi
Apr 9th 2011, 12:25
Where there is a will there is a way... Trouble is we are so politically dominated and obfuscated that we cannot see any other solution to our problems but a political party one, even to hold a simple non-political referendum. What if we were ever to have a referendum about the existence or the role of political parties themselves, would it still be be supervised by these same parties? Are our legislators so politically blinkered that they cannot think having non-political solutions for day to day affairs, or do politicians have to put their fingers in all pies of whatever make and hue in Malta? Now I understand why all the clanging fuss when a party "wins" an election. It is all about power and party petty-mindedness entangled in a national mesh. Pity the nation!
Joseph Caruana
Apr 9th 2011, 12:13
Can't we just vote with our identity card or passport? It's still a formal identification of oneself? Or wait our identity haven't been changed since... (And why such issues have to be tackled by politicians?)
C Dalli
Apr 9th 2011, 10:45
It is 2011, and once more nationwide voting will take place on the basis of long expired ID cards whose lifespan has been artificially extended by legal notices time and time again since 2002, personal votes distributed this time by employees of a private mail corporation, an electoral register which is still being kept in a totally obsolete manner and has to be published twice yearly instead of being kept up to date in an ongoing manner... and no doubt there will be the spectacle of numerous Air Malta flights ferrying voters to Malta, as if computers and the internet do not yet exist and Malta does not yet form part of the digital age....is this Smart Island Malta??
j brincat
Apr 9th 2011, 10:36
In spite of all the talk by Dr Fenech Adami had their been some willingness on the part of the PN, the 2800 young voters would have, in the coming referendum, exercised their democratic rights.
Actions speak louder than mere words!
(JB)
Denis Pace
Apr 9th 2011, 16:19
Why all this fuss now?????
This happens at EVERY election (or referendum). The writ issued applies to a specific cut-off date. In the last election, the number of 18 year-olds who could not vote was even greater...yet no-one spoke a word!
Cut this blooming hypocrisy.