Advert

Parties argue on young people made ineligible to vote...while they agree on alternative system

UPDATED - While the political parties argued this week about how at least 2,800 young people will not be able to vote in the referendum because their 18th birthday came after the publication of the October electoral register, it was revealed today that the political parties already agree on an alternative system which will prevent this sort of situation.

Nationalist MP Beppe Fenech Adami said this morning that in the meetings of the Select Committee for Democratic Change he had proposed a system for a rolling electoral register - a system which would have provided for ongoing updating of the register and prevented the current controversy where 2,800 young people will not be able to vote in the divorce referendum because their birthday came after the publication of the electoral register.

Progress had been made on the proposal, he said, but then the Opposition walked out of the committee and everything stopped. He said that another proposal made to the committee would have avoided the current situation where people were sometimes taken to polling stations on stretchers.

Dr Fenech Adami was speaking on the Radio Malta programme Ghandi Xi Nghid. The Opposition walked out of the committee last year in protest over a decision taken by the Speaker in Parliament following a vote on power tariffs.

Labour MP Evarist Bartolo said the government had shown lack of commitment for progress in the select committee.

"The committee was moribund" he said, adding that progress on amendments to the electoral law could have still been made in further talks also involving (Labour MP) Michael Falzon.

Referring to the current controversy, Dr Fenech Adami said the proposal for the Electoral Commission to delay publication of the President's writ for the holding fo the referendum to beyond the electoral register publication cut-off date was undemocratic.

He also pointed out that fewer young people would miss voting in the referendum than at the last general election.

LABOUR PARTY AGREES

In a reaction, Labour Party spokesman Michael Falzon said that everybody agreed with the proposal to have a rolling register. There was also agreement on other proposals to make it easier for eligible voters to exercise their right to vote.

He said the PN, however, had opposed various PL proposals, particularly on voting at St Vincent de Paule Home for the Elderly, which would have made it easier for the people there to vote.

Dr Falzon said it was the government which had 'killed off' the select committee by not convening meetings for many months, to the extent that Labour MPs speaking in Parliament had called for meetings to be held.

He also pointed out that the number of 2,800 young people who cannot vote in the referendum only included those young people whose birthday fell between the publication of the October register and the cut-off date for the publication of the April register. There will be more who will not be eligible to vote despite turning 18 by the time the referendum is held on May 28.

(The October electoral register is to be used for the referendum since the President's writ for the holding of the referendum was issued before the publication of the April register).

AD CALLS FOR CHANGE

In a press conference this morning, Michael Briguglio, AD chairman, balmed both political parties in parliament for the fact that 2,800 young people cannot vote.

"Not only have they devised legislation which excludes other political parties and movements from the referendum electoral process, but they are also both to blame for the exclusion of 2,800 18 year old voters from the forthcoming divorce referendum. Instead of blaming each other both parties should reach parliamentary consensus to allow these voters to exercise the basic right to vote".

Dirk Urpani, AD spokesman for Youth and Sports, said: " Instead of fighting over how to prevent 2,800 young people from voting, our Government should be seeking to introduce the 16+ vote so that this democracy can be more representative. In itself, the fact that some people who will not be entitled to vote will be 18 years and 8 months old clearly shows that Malta's electoral system requires change".

Advert

13 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Peter Korsten

Apr 10th 2011, 22:00

For some obscure reason, people living abroad tend to vote more conservatively than the 'average' voter. The same is the case for the Netherlands. I happily vote in Dutch national elections by mail (unfortunately, the experiment via the internet was not repeated), and most of my expatriate compatriots that vote are a small, but potentially valuable group of voters. Perhaps, if Maltese could vote via mail, a larger percentage would vote PN? I honestly couldn't say.

MBorg

Apr 9th 2011, 13:56

Yes, they would have. This is not somthing new. There is always a cut off date for elections or referenda. Some are always left out. This time it was the turnof these 2800 young people.

m busuttil

Apr 9th 2011, 15:55

forget what both parties are saying.
forget all the accusation and excuses that are being made.
we are more interested in what these new voters think about this latest twist in Maltese politics, and how all this will influence future voting

Denis Pace

Apr 9th 2011, 16:19

Why all this fuss now?????
This happens at EVERY election (or referendum). The writ issued applies to a specific cut-off date. In the last election, the number of 18 year-olds who could not vote was even greater...yet no-one spoke a word!
Cut this blooming hypocrisy.

Advert
Advert