Advert

Air strike our mistake - rebels

A crowd of mostly women and children attend a rally to protest against deaths caused by Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi;s forces and his continued refusal to step down, on the corniche in Benghazi, Libya. An airstrike intended to thwart Gaddafi’s forces killed 13 rebel fighters in eastern Libya instead, the opposition said but they described it as an "unfortunate accident" and stressed it did not diminish their support for the international air campaign. Photo: Ben Curtis

A crowd of mostly women and children attend a rally to protest against deaths caused by Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi;s forces and his continued refusal to step down, on the corniche in Benghazi, Libya. An airstrike intended to thwart Gaddafi’s forces killed 13 rebel fighters in eastern Libya instead, the opposition said but they described it as an "unfortunate accident" and stressed it did not diminish their support for the international air campaign. Photo: Ben Curtis

A Nato air strike intended to thwart Muammar Gaddafi's forces killed 13 rebel fighters in eastern Libya, the opposition said.

But they described yesterday's incident as an "unfortunate accident" and stressed it did not diminish their support for the international air campaign.

The rebels' response to the attack - blaming it on a mistake within their ranks - highlighted their heavy dependence on the international air campaign as they face the superior military power of the long-time Libyan leader. The misfire also showed the challenges the coalition faces in identifying targets without co-ordination with forces on the ground.

"As regrettable as it may be, we understand that we might have to give up lives for the greater good. We have to look at the bigger picture," opposition spokesman Mustafa Gheriani said.

"This is a war and the lines are so fluid going back and forth, so it's natural that mistakes will happen."

The fighters were hit on Friday night as they moved forward, attempting to take back the oil city of Brega while air strikes were in progress. Seven fighters were injured.

Another opposition spokesman, Abdel-Hafidh Ghoga, said it was an example of the lack of co-ordination in the ranks that has proved a key obstacle to victory over the more organised Libyan military.

Rebels without training - sometimes even without weapons - have rushed in and out of fighting in a free-for-all for more than six weeks, repeatedly getting trounced by Gaddafi's more heavily-armed forces. But ex-military officers who have joined the rebel side have stepped up training efforts and taken a greater role in the fight.

"This unfortunate accident was a mistake that was caused by the rebels' advance during the coalition's attack," Mr Ghoga said. "Now the military leadership that has been organised more effectively recently is working on preventing the recurrence of these accidents."

Sorting rebels from Gaddafi's forces has become more difficult recently, as some loyalists have given up tanks and other armoured vehicles for the kind of equipment the rebels rely on: pick-up trucks and other vehicles equipped with makeshift armaments.

Two men badly injured in the strike said it happened at about 8pm on Friday after somebody fired heavy weaponry into the air as a rebel convoy made its way from Ajdabiya towards Brega.

"We all turned to him and said, 'Why the hell did you do that?', said Ali Abdullah Zio, 28. He said it was a mistake, then pulled out of the convoy and drove back to Ajdabiya. Moments later there was an air strike.

"We were just driving along and then everything was on fire," said 19-year-old Ibrahim al-Shahaibi. "It's fate. They must have thought we were Gaddafi's brigades when they hit us. We need to get rid of him."

Nato spokeswoman Oana Lungescu said the alliance was investigating the reports.

"The exact details are hard to verify because we have no reliable source on the ground," Ms Lungescu said. "Clearly, if someone fires at one of our aircraft they have the right to defend themselves."

Nato, which on Thursday took over what had been a US-led military campaign to stop Gaddafi from attacking his own people, also is investigating whether other air strikes have killed civilians in western Libya, as the Libyan government claims.

Rebels control much of eastern Libya, but in the west the only major city they hold is Misrata, which has been besieged for weeks by Gaddafi forces who have cut off water, power and food supplies.

Medical officials said Saturday that government forces killed 37 civilians over the past two days in an unrelenting campaign of shelling and sniper fire and an attack that burned down the city's main stocks of flour and sugar.

Advert

11 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

J. Vella

Apr 3rd 2011, 12:10

What has 'dulce et decorum est' got to do with this?

It's a civil war, not war between states or countries. There's even no 'casus belli' here. I perfectly agree with you that war is a waste of life but the quote has been taken out of context. Hope you don't mind me pointing it out.

Mary Attard

Apr 3rd 2011, 22:38

...pro Patria mori? These people are joining a foreign aggressor against their own country though it is doubtful how many are actually Libyans and how many are foreighners including Al Qaida! Their so called insurrection enabled attacks that already cost many innocent lives and destroyed their country's infrastructure. How is that good for their Patria? I am not even sure it is much good for the attackers. US lost all credibility. So did president Obama, president Sarkozy, PM Cameron as well s all those "friends" that sold Libya down the drain for their own perceived gain and advantage. Patria?!!!

ray sacco

Apr 4th 2011, 06:38

@vincent galea:
this has nothing to do with dying one's country...................it is to die for one's freedom and dignity.

C Falzon

Apr 3rd 2011, 09:42

So how exactly do you propose to stop the loss of life? Is it by stopping the action of the coalition? Or perhaps by disarming the rebels?

Kleaven Maniscalco

Apr 3rd 2011, 10:09

Dulce et decorum est pro patria muori....its hard to understand these words in times of peace.

I still believe these rebels should adopt a one shot, one kill policy. I don't understand the reason you have to shoot the air and waste ammunition senselessly....but anyway may all this end well soon for the good of the many

T. Cardona

Apr 3rd 2011, 10:41

The so called 'Gift of Life' group is solely anti-abortionist. Once a baby is born ... life seems to cease to be a gift. All forms of life ought to be respected, if we really believe in the gift of life.

Peter Korsten

Apr 3rd 2011, 23:32

"I don't understand the reason you have to shoot the air and waste ammunition senselessly..." It's just something to do, just like fireworks in summer and carcades after a football match or election result is something that the Maltese do. Obviously, fireworks and carcades fall into a different category than shooting in the air, which *will* kill people, and which is usually not appreciated by aircraft who think they're getting shot at.

Advert
Advert