Advert

The xenophobes in our midst

It’s been one of those funny weeks, with it dawning on me at about 8 p.m. on Wednesday that my deadline was about to make one of those delightful whooshing sounds so loved by Doug Adams as it flew by. Mid-week holidays, especially if they’re not on a Wednesday, are great for bridging into a long weekend, but they do play havoc with your head when you’re trying to stay in work mode.

Not that writing this is really work, of course.

The big story remains Libya, it goes without saying, and the twist that affects us, as it was always going to, is the exodus of people who will fetch up on our shores. I’ve purposely not read the stories online because the temptation to take a look at the comments will become almost irresistible and I really, really don’t want to be reminded about the shameful and despicable inherent racism that too many people seem to espouse.

I glanced at maltastar.com in order to get some inspiration for this week and under the story about how we’re going to try to help the injured from Libya, three of the four comments that I read were going on about how we should take care of our own first, and not in a kind way either. The fourth was about how the government should respect its Constitutional obligations and adopt a neutral stance in taking care of the wounded, which is as nonsensical as all the other guff about that dead duck, our so-called neutrality and non-alignment.

It is blindingly obvious that the rest of the world has to help us and Italy take the strain of coping with the increased refugee stream that the North African turmoil is creating, but this does not mean that the revolting xenophobes should be given free rein in vomiting their bile into the public domain.

In the meantime, the Bishop of Gozo is exercised not by this manifestation of un-Christian sentiments but about the sinfulness of divorce and voting for it.

Coming back into the domestic scene, with minutes to spare the Attorney General filed an appeal in our version of the Oz Obscenity Trial, prompting Labour to condemn the government (they fail to grasp the difference between the Attorney General acting in his independent role and the government, which does not have the power to order him to do anything in this sort of case) for appealing.

I am on record, as you know, as being pretty disgusted by the fact that the University rector asked for the prosecution in the first place and by the fact that the police didn’t tell him to stop wasting their time, but for the second largest party in the country to make this sort of comment is, frankly, not on.

Joseph Muscat had already made it pretty clear that he has little respect for due process when he promised that when (if) elected, he will agree with himself about VAT on vehicle purchases, whatever the courts say, and this condemnation is more in the same vein and as such unacceptable.

It’s that time of the year when hunting gets some headlines, it being spring and all that, when a certain type of young man’s fancy turns to thoughts of slaughter and imprisonment of birds of the feathered variety.

The government must be thinking that it is actually doing something right on the matter of spring hunting because both the hunters and the conservationists have been getting all worked up about the regulations that have been put in place.

Just for the record, when I say “hunters and conservationists”, I am writing about two separate and distinct groups, who don’t see eye to eye (that’s an understatement) and not about that piece of black humour, the Federation of Conservationist Hunters, which is about as accurate a description as the one Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici used about the thug Gaddafi.

For those whose memory is less than perfect, Dr Muscat’s predecessor but one as leader of the Labour Party holds the thug Gaddafi in such high esteem that he calls him “the arch democrat”, which probably gives you an idea of the extent to which democracy is understood in certain Labour quarters.

As you know, I’m generally to be found in Gozo of a weekend and wearing my northern hat, allow me to recommend that those of you who might be so disposed should put their hands into their pockets and hand over the paltry sum of €150 to the people who are promoting the museum in Victoria, next to the Basilica. I was privileged to be given a look at the project and it promises to be a worthy cause and a half.

While on the matter of recommendations for things to do up north, I’m pleased to tell you that Sicilia Bella is open again in Mġarr and the standards have been retained. For less complex fare, or to put it differently, good honest stuff at good honest prices, we dropped by Ta’ Vestru in Qala, where the pizza is more than slightly good, and Tamarisk in Victoria, opposite the school complex. You mustn’t expect Gordon Blue to be in the house, but the steak, egg and chips is good and no mistake.

imbocca@gmail.com

www.timesofmalta.com/blogs

Advert

17 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Johnny Xerri

Apr 3rd 2011, 17:17

Who mentioned hunting in this article?
Who is a lawyer that cannot rightfully interpret the Birds Directive?

Mr Anton Grech

Apr 16th 2011, 17:25

@ Johnny Xerri,

It would appear that you still do not understand the meaning of xenophobia. Try looking it up in the dictionary. I.M. Beck's job is to comment about issues of interest in Malta. One of the issues is what in Malta some people consider hunting, and it has nothing to do with xenophobia - except perhaps in your mind.

Johnny Xerri

Apr 2nd 2011, 18:37

Good luck in making Malta the 1st country in the world to ban hunting...who will help you PN (not likely, since they are opting to open spring hunting and autumn was never a probelm), PL (not likely, after all hitory speaks on its own), AD (not likely since they never got more than 2 cents votes)

Moreover, on another post a BLM member claimed that he believes that the government struck a good balance...

As for not expelling anyone, FKNK did kick out members or did you conveniently forget how the Mellieha Natura 2000 vandals were expelled by FKNK. Like them other members found of grave illegalities (not minor infringements like being 49m from a road instead of 50m) have been expelled. FKNK is the only organisation wanting a law that disallows repeat offenders from having a membership for a number of years...however, you know perfectly well that if the law is not in place and a person is expelled from FKNK he can easily join another club.

Malta the only no hunting zone in the world....yep goodluck....dream on

Carmelo Micallef, Valletta

Apr 2nd 2011, 20:21

Gentlemen, may I suggest a simple solution - a Referendum with 2 questions:

1 Do you want hunting banned totally in Malta?

2 Do you want all firearms (excepting Govt forces) banned totally in Malta?

The Referendum can be set up in a legal manner that makes it mandatory for the MP's to accept the result of each question and thus washing their hands by declaring it the will of the people.

Both sides can then stop speaking in a manner that suggests they represent all of Malta.

Lets go for it.

Johnny Xerri

Apr 2nd 2011, 20:39

@ Carmelo Micallef;

In addition to your referendum I would add another;

1. Would you have voted YES in the referedum if hunting would have been banned?
2. Since the referendum guarantee did not materialise as guaranteed, do you still want to be in the EU?

You cannot have all the cake and eat all of it...

Andrew Borg-Cardona

Apr 2nd 2011, 12:57

A series of non sequitors. It's futile arguing with people like you, sadly.

Johnny Xerri

Apr 2nd 2011, 17:57

haha your not gonna wear your 'Illegal Spring Hunting' T-shirt now?


Do you or don't you eat meat...do you implicitly kill animals for food?
Did you or didn't you wear the infamous lack T-Shirt 'Ban Illegal Spring Hunting'...only to be proven wrong since spring hunting is legal after all?

If anything instead of answering without placing a factual response...you could have placed a sensible response and got the upperhand...however I understand that there is no point in further comments after all its pretty miserable that an ex student of yours get the upperhand...& exposes your "Illegal Spring hunting' stance as a bad interpretation of the Birds Directive and a rather pityfull slip in your profession...at this point readers know who is sad...no point in you further exposing your sadness & miserable skills at interpreting the Birds Directive!!!

Andrew Borg-Cardona

Apr 2nd 2011, 12:58

Delusional obfuscation, as always.

Andrew Borg-Cardona

Apr 2nd 2011, 12:59

As in when Nationalists are described as having different DNA, perhaps? Hallina, trid?

Advert
Advert