Gaddafi still attacking civilians - US admiral
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi is still attacking civilians in direct violation of a UN resolution, a US admiral said today.
"It's my judgement that, despite our success, that Gaddafi and his forces are not yet complying to the UN resolution due to the continued aggressive actions his forces have taken against the civilian population of Libya," Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander aboard the USS Mount Whitney, told reporters.
He said pro-Gaddafiforces were still withdrawing from the towns of Ajdabiyah, Misratah and Zawiyah.
Turning to the crew of a F-15 jet which crashed in Libya late yesterdat due to a technical fault, Locklear said: "Both crew members ejected and they're safe."
"One crew member was recovered by coalition forces. The other crew member was recovered by Libyan people. He was been treated with dignity and respect," he added.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Xuereb
Mar 23rd 2011, 00:48
And still we get ex-politicians, sorry! ex-hasbeens, ex-PL Prime Minister no less who stands up for Gaddafi. And another Maltese stalwart, an EU Commissioner who goes by the name of John Dalli, who as much as said that the atrocities in Libya are staged.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwt5K4KGnkk&feature=player_embedded
That said, and through observation over a long period of time not least culminating in current events, I have always seen the Libyan people are very passionate and volatile (nothing wrong with that). BUT, and this is my personal feeling, I just can not see these people having a go at a Western style democracy and making a good job of it. Playing the victim, the sympathy card is fine for a while. But there comes a time when one has to take responsibility for one's own actions and future. Not an easy undertaking after forty years of oppression. Interesting too that Gaddafi still has his supporters/henchmen/mercenaries in Libya itself never mind his blood-brothers in Malta. I wonder what's the deal? There has to be a deal. Or more simply, warped minds which abound. Such is war! When oil - no pun, it's a saying! - rises to the surface. As we say.
Andrew Paris
Mar 22nd 2011, 21:53
While I have always hated Gaddafi, I think the US admiral is feeding the propaganda machine to excuse the right to bomb. What proof do we see of this if there are no forces on the ground? Both Countries are hard to rely on when it comes to there words. I hope for the people's sake this comes to an end soon.
Jesmond Micallef
Mar 22nd 2011, 19:26
Its good to read that the American pilot of the F-15 aircraft was treated well by the Libyan people and that both pilots are safe and sound. The need to defend civilian life is present allover the world. Thats why nations have their own military hardware and resources. Whats going on in Libya reflects this. It reflects this very greatly and very deeply too, worldover.
Ms P M Graham
Mar 22nd 2011, 18:09
"One crew member was recovered by coalition forces. The other crew member was recovered by Libyan people. He was been treated with dignity and respect," he added."
Fortunately, he wasn't found by Gaddafi's lot, because we all know what would have happened.
I can almost understand anti gaddafi protests. I can't understand pro Gadafi protests. Why are they here? I also object to the green flag being flown anywhere in the World. That in itself is supporting this murderous regime.
I also can't understand the PR guy asking for a fact finding mission. Surely allowing reporters to travel freely and report accurately, (slight reservations there) would suffice.
M. Mamo
Mar 22nd 2011, 18:23
As you said ... I read somewhere that these people even gave him medical supplies )even though they are scarce even for their own use) to heal his minor injuries, hugged him when he neared them afraid for his life, told him they were friends and formed a line to shake hands with their new "hero"
And people doubt who the terrorist is?
Bill Khan
Mar 22nd 2011, 20:20
The tribes in the eats are anti Ghadafi in any case. The senoussi tribe is predominant in the east of Libya. king idrees whom Ghadafi toppled was from tehy Senoussi tribe.
Ghadafi's support is in the west of libya. tripoli with 2.6 million population is more likely in favour of the colonel. esseentially the country is split in the middle. The solution may now be either to give the tribes in the east the air cover and the weapons to launch attacke against the west and take over all Libya or divide the country between east and west . Either way the future opf Libya is not too bright. It could have the same fate as that of Iraq and Afghanistan. May be that is what the powers intend it to be i.e divided and vulnerable and easy to mop up its assets (oil).
The powers funded and armed the rebels over the last few years, but the rebels fell well short of their target to reach Tripoli. This is not a popular uprising but a war being conducted by the powerful countries against one man Ghaddafi using armed combatants. Freedom bought with outside help is not freedom but slavery.
Bill Khan
Mar 22nd 2011, 21:13
Surely the rebels will treat them with respect and dignity beacuse they are their patrons in training and funding them against Libya and its givernment. In other places e.g Egypt and Tunisia, Bahraina nd yemen people have protested without arms and aion a peaceful way, but in the case of Libya the rebels have come out fully armed. Patrons of the rebels had probably anticipated Ghadafi might go on the defensive but he actually went on the offensive. One jouranalist seems to think he drew the west in the game of no fly zones deleberately.
west was hoping that the rebels will be able to take the most of the oil area in a short time , but they were disappointed forcing UK and France to use plan B and attack Libya blatantly and pretext was saving lives of civilians.
Please choose the reason of your report below: