Advert

Gaddafi still attacking civilians - US admiral

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi is still attacking civilians in direct violation of a UN resolution, a US admiral said today.

"It's my judgement that, despite our success, that Gaddafi and his forces are not yet complying to the UN resolution due to the continued aggressive actions his forces have taken against the civilian population of Libya," Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander aboard the USS Mount Whitney, told reporters.

He said pro-Gaddafiforces were still withdrawing from the towns of Ajdabiyah, Misratah and Zawiyah.

Turning to the crew of a F-15 jet which crashed in Libya late yesterdat due to a technical fault, Locklear said: "Both crew members ejected and they're safe."

"One crew member was recovered by coalition forces. The other crew member was recovered by Libyan people. He was been treated with dignity and respect," he added.

Advert

7 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

M. Mamo

Mar 22nd 2011, 18:23

As you said ... I read somewhere that these people even gave him medical supplies )even though they are scarce even for their own use) to heal his minor injuries, hugged him when he neared them afraid for his life, told him they were friends and formed a line to shake hands with their new "hero"

And people doubt who the terrorist is?

Bill Khan

Mar 22nd 2011, 20:20

The tribes in the eats are anti Ghadafi in any case. The senoussi tribe is predominant in the east of Libya. king idrees whom Ghadafi toppled was from tehy Senoussi tribe.
Ghadafi's support is in the west of libya. tripoli with 2.6 million population is more likely in favour of the colonel. esseentially the country is split in the middle. The solution may now be either to give the tribes in the east the air cover and the weapons to launch attacke against the west and take over all Libya or divide the country between east and west . Either way the future opf Libya is not too bright. It could have the same fate as that of Iraq and Afghanistan. May be that is what the powers intend it to be i.e divided and vulnerable and easy to mop up its assets (oil).

The powers funded and armed the rebels over the last few years, but the rebels fell well short of their target to reach Tripoli. This is not a popular uprising but a war being conducted by the powerful countries against one man Ghaddafi using armed combatants. Freedom bought with outside help is not freedom but slavery.

Bill Khan

Mar 22nd 2011, 21:13

Surely the rebels will treat them with respect and dignity beacuse they are their patrons in training and funding them against Libya and its givernment. In other places e.g Egypt and Tunisia, Bahraina nd yemen people have protested without arms and aion a peaceful way, but in the case of Libya the rebels have come out fully armed. Patrons of the rebels had probably anticipated Ghadafi might go on the defensive but he actually went on the offensive. One jouranalist seems to think he drew the west in the game of no fly zones deleberately.
west was hoping that the rebels will be able to take the most of the oil area in a short time , but they were disappointed forcing UK and France to use plan B and attack Libya blatantly and pretext was saving lives of civilians.

Advert
Advert