Feelings of poor mental health widespread among immigrants
Over 80 per cent of immigrants fled their country to escape war or persecution. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
About 70 per cent of immigrants in Malta believe they are suffering from mental health problems and almost half say they have practically no emotional support, according to a study on migrants’ healthcare access.
The “alarming findings” on perceived psychological health of migrants could be the result of traumatising experiences the Africans faced in their country of origin or during their trip out of their country. In fact 83 per cent said they fled their country to escape war or persecution.
Being separated from their family, waiting for an asylum request to be decided once in Malta, being held in detention and in poor working and housing conditions could contribute to their feelings.
The situation highlights the need for access to mental healthcare for those who endure hardships, according to a report entitled Access to Healthcare and Living Conditions of Asylum Seekers and Undocumented Migrants.
The research includes interviews with 100 migrants, with an average age of 30, and was carried out by the Health for Undocumented Migrants and Asylum Seekers (Huma) Network that works to promote access to healthcare for migrants. The network was represented in Malta by Skop – the Platform for NGOs.
Project coordinator Davina Nieper stressed that the report was not aimed at attacking Malta’s efficient healthcare system but at showing that some people were slipping through the system. The idea was to raise awareness to solve the situation.
Results showed that one in every four immigrants had been refused healthcare treatment at some point during their stay on the island.
Some 70 per cent had encountered some difficulty in accessing healthcare with the most common obstacles being long waiting lists, discrimination, language barriers and the lack of information about the availability of healthcare. Over 40 per cent were not aware or not sure of their entitlement to healthcare. The report points to the lack of a legal framework that clearly outlines who is eligible to healthcare. Malta has a law recognising the right of asylum seekers to access state medical care services but there is no legal provision on access to healthcare for undocumented migrants (people who are not granted asylum) other than a non-legally binding policy document establishing that all foreigners in detention are entitled to free medical care.
The report makes several recommendations that include introducing inclusive legal provisions to bring access to healthcare for all, providing better information about healthcare entitlement, reducing administrative difficulties and providing professional mental healthcare to those who need it.
Other recommendations include ensuring decent living conditions in open centres and accessibility to decent housing.
Between 2002 and 2009, about 13,000 immigrants landed in Malta. Since then the numbers have dropped, following a bilateral agreement between Italy and Libya. This has led to improvement of the situation in detention and open centres where there is less over-crowding.
The poor conditions, especially in detention centres, had been highlighted in damning reports by international organisations including Medicines Sans Frontiere.
Immigrant healthcare and lifestyle
• 27 per cent of migrants worked for over 10 hours a day between several times and every day.
• 83 per cent of working migrants have temporary jobs and 46 per cent of them feel their working conditions could affect their health.
• 77 per cent encountered problems with their accommodation that could be harmful to their health.
• 41 per cent of respondents consulted a public healthcare facility and 36 per cent went to the emergency department of a hospital.
• Nine per cent did not have running water and eight per cent had no electricity.
• 34 per cent consulted private healthcare. Some, including a high number of asylum seekers, did so to avoid being reported to authorities in spite of the fact that they were protected.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Dora Smith
Mar 19th 2011, 10:51
• 34 per cent consulted private healthcare. Some, including a high number of asylum seekers, did so to avoid being reported to authorities in spite of the fact that they were protected. why the fear than???? something is fishy ... and they seem to be doing well to afford private healthcare unlike quite a number of maltese families.
Charity beings at home dear all NGOs concerned and first you should look around you and the maltese people not around someone who entered our country illegaly and instead of being grateful all they do is moan moan and moan. We thank God for little mercies while these people expected to be treated better us.
Therefore according to these studies the Maltese people should all be declared insane already
lucia davies
Mar 19th 2011, 14:24
A lot of the furnished flats in Bugibba are being rented to these migrants ,, who is paying for these flats and I am sure they all have water and elect, but if you go around where these flats are, they look
like slum areas the state of the properties have become so uncared for,,, the owners are to blame as well leaving their properties get into such state,, the clothes hanging out in balconies well I leave you to judge these situations,, I feel sorry for maltese people living in these apartments. I feel insane just as much as them,, . my husband and I worked all our lives never taking anything from the Gvernment,, now he died and I am on a miserly widow's pension, from which I have to pay all the bills and no support from anyone,
Dora Smith
Mar 19th 2011, 10:51
27 per cent of migrants worked for over 10 hours a day between several times and every day - Maltese people have been working for years in this pattern to to make ends meet.
• 83 per cent of working migrants have temporary jobs and 46 per cent of them feel their working conditions could affect their health. - isnt this the same situation and instability the maltese people face in their everyday employment?
• 77 per cent encountered problems with their accommodation that could be harmful to their health. At least they have accommodation ...... or did they live in some palaces?
• 41 per cent of respondents consulted a public healthcare facility and 36 per cent went to the emergency department of a hospital. They got free treatment I assume and even skipped the que right ?
• Nine per cent did not have running water and eight per cent had no electricity. Where are they living ? Are they squatting off somewhere, I dont believe we have 3rd world countries standard living conditions in Malta
Louise Vella
Mar 19th 2011, 09:09
3.
The bottom line remains that no one asked these illegal immigrants to come to Malta and no one is asking them to stay. They remain completely free to leave. Their ingratitude knows no bounds. They get everything for free and still they complain.
W Spencer
Mar 19th 2011, 14:40
Unfortunately, nothing will ever change in your or my lifetime. Anyone or any Political party that tells the truth and lays out the facts and consequences, will be branded as Racists and / or Facists. .
In the UK, parties such as the UKIP and BNP tell you all the facts, but they are treated like pariahs by the sheeple !! People in the UK have got the type of societ they wanted and voted for, so why the complaints ???
Louise Vella
Mar 19th 2011, 09:07
2.
“83 per cent said they fled their country of origin to escape war or persecution”. On the other hand, the Refugee Commissioner in Malta repeats every year in his annual reports that asylum seekers regularly tell him untrue stories and submit false or falsified documents.
Louise Vella
Mar 19th 2011, 09:07
1.
“The research was carried out by HUMA”. This is the first time this NGO has appeared on the horizon. It stands for “Health and Living Conditions of Asylum Seekers and Undocumented Migrants”, that is, of illegal immigrants. HUMA is represented in Malta by Skop. Who are the persons behind Skop? Do HUMA and Skop get funds from the EU? How much? Does anonymity enhance the credibility of Skop? Can we have more transparency, please? Or are these the same few people hiding behind different NGOs, each one drawing funds for its superiors?