Malta's labour costs increase lowest in EU - but three countries see decrease
Hourly labour costs in Malta increased by the lowest rate in the EU in the last quarter of 2010, although there were three countries which actually saw a decline.
Figures issued by Eurostat, the EU's statistics office, show that in the euro area (EA16), the hourly labour costs rose by 1.6% in the year up to the fourth quarter of 2010, compared with 0.9% for the previous quarter. In the EU27, the annual rise was 2.0% up to the fourth quarter of 2010, compared with 1.2% for the previous quarter.
The two main components of labour costs are wages and salaries and non-wage costs.
In the euro area, wages and salaries per hour worked grew by 1.4% in the year up to the fourth quarter of 2010, and the non-wage component by 1.9%, compared with 0.8% and 1.3% respectively for the third quarter of 2010.
In the EU27, hourly wages & salaries rose by 2.1% and the non-wage component by 1.5% in the year up to the fourth quarter of 2010, compared with 1.2% for both components for the third quarter of 2010.
The breakdown by economic activity shows that in the euro area hourly labour costs rose by 1.7% in industry, 1.1% in construction and 1.6% in services in the year up to the fourth quarter of 2010. In the EU27, labour costs per hour grew by 1.9% in industry, 1.0% in construction and 2.2% in services.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, the highest annual increases in hourly labour costs were in Bulgaria (+7.6%) and Romania (+5.4%). There were decreases in Greece (-6.5%), Hungary (-2.3%) and Ireland (-1.2%)
The lowest increases were registered by Malta and Latvia, at 0.3%.
3 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
A Camilleri
Mar 17th 2011, 13:47
Ghandna biex niftahru eh! U xi erbgha li jaqilghuha sew jitellmu kontra l-mizerja ta COLA, li diga hi dahq fil-wicc meta tqis li mahduma fuq ammont ta' fiss u baxx.
Victor Laiviera
Mar 17th 2011, 13:18
Which, translated, probably means that Malta had the lowest increases in salaries and wages.
What about prices? Would anyone care to tell us how we rank there?
P.Cassar
Mar 17th 2011, 12:51
POINTS TO PONDER:
THE MINISTERS 200%?? INCREASE WAS SURELY NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.
ARE SUCH WORKERS LOW WAGES AND INCREASES BEHIND INVESTMENT SO LOUDLY SHOUTED ABOUT?
REASONS FOR INCREASING COSTS OF PRODUCTION ARE THEREFORE NOT, REPEAT NOT BECAUSE OF WORKERS' WAGES.
WHAT ABOUT GOVT INDUCED COSTS EX FUEL WHERE 55% ARE TAXES?????
MEANINGFUL COMMENTS EXPECTED.