Scale of Japan quake-tsunami destruction revealed
As Japan begins the process of recovering from Friday’s catastrophic earthquake and tsunami, the enormity of the task facing the country has become clear.
Advert
Advert
As Japan begins the process of recovering from Friday’s catastrophic earthquake and tsunami, the enormity of the task facing the country has become clear.
Copyright © 2012 timesofmalta.com
Copyright © Allied Newspapers Ltd., printed on - 01-06-2012 - This article is for personal use only, and should not be distributed
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Jonathan Barbara
Mar 18th 2011, 18:46
Looking around I found this 2008 report which highlights the LACK of coastal defences from flooding, and then as well tsunamis. http://ec.europa.eu/maritimeaffairs/climate_change/malta_en.pdf In defense of Sea Level Rise and coastal floods it states that only 5% of Malta is below 7.6m.. Japan's Tsunami was 23m....
Jonathan Barbara
Mar 16th 2011, 16:20
National Geographic says about the Indian Ocean 2004 tsunami "caused waves as high as 50 feet (15 meters) in some places, according to news reports. But in many other places witnesses described a rapid surging of the ocean, more like an extremely powerful river or a flood than the advance and retreat of giant waves."
So the concern, rather than the height of the wave, is the volume of water: will the valleys be big enough to hold that amount of water? Will it find its way to the sea soon enough?
The low-lying east is open to the eastern mediterranean, whilst the high Dingli side is sheltered by the Tunisian peninsula. Possibly a good thing as the water would relatively slow down in its uphill struggle, for if it were to come in through the Dingli side, given that it does overcome the cliffs, then it would be a devastating downhill freefall with no chance of escape for the island.
The possible tsunami evacuation plan reminds me of a song in my teens... Go West!
r ferriggi
Mar 15th 2011, 08:34
rightly said Barbara.
we need an earthquake plan, a tsunami plan, a sea water contamination plan ( desalination stopped), an oil spill plan.
i am neither joking nor complaining.
i am encouraging the authiorities to start working in this direction.
IT IS A FACT,,, THAT we live in ( or clsoe to) a relatively very unstable area vis a vis earthquakes, we live in a small island in a heavily traffiked part of the med.
lets start thinking about catastrophes so that we are better prepared.
i heard some experts say that IF Japan had not been (very very) prepared,,,, the disaster would have been many times worse.
Jonathan Barbara
Mar 14th 2011, 23:15
Seriously, some geographic experts should start forming a strategy on how to put forth an evacuation procedure in the case of such a catastrophe claiming our island - no matter how remote. If you consider it, we have lots of residential areas lying along the eastern, low-lying coast and around the valleys up which such water could make its devastating way.
John Caruana
Mar 15th 2011, 08:27
the biggest problem i see is time.
Joseph W. Galea
Mar 15th 2011, 09:11
Jonathan, I hear you but, the only escape is to pray that the situation will never happen in Malta. Because if it ever does, to the same extent as in Japan, there wil be nothing left except barren rock, if that.
You are talking an earthquake and tsunami of Japan's magnitude (or even less) unleashed on a 100+ sq kms island.
Just hope and pray that it will never happen.
J.Xuereb
Mar 15th 2011, 09:28
Well, I think we should even forget that parts of Malta could be saved of such a strong Tsunami as this. The thing is so strong that it would flow and swipe the whole island in an hour!!!! Forget it would hit just the low-lying cost, because the area it can cover is immense!!!
MC Borg
Mar 15th 2011, 09:30
You have a point, however I doubt that if it ever had to occur here, we would manage to get out of it, considering that Malta is a small island.
G.Bugeja
Mar 15th 2011, 10:30
if you watch videos of this tragedy you'll notice that only the low lying flat areas got hit bad..
it was also said that the ocean levels rose by 4 stories, (around 13m) that means that since Malta has few low lying flat land, a tsunami like this would only hit places on the east side of malta, (M'Xlokk, B'Buga, M'Scala, 3 cities, Marsa, Valletta, Gzira, Sliema etc...) high ground would be relatively safe...
Jesmond Micallef
Mar 14th 2011, 20:55
What raw destructive power !! Words simply cannot describe the scenes depicted in the video footage here !! I extend my solidarity with all the Japanese people in this hour of need. How absolutely tragic !! Don't know what to say, really, completely speechless !!