Update 3: Ir-Realta acquittal - PL hopes there will be no appeal
UPDATED - Adds PL reaction, court's considerations
The Labour Party this afternoon welcomed the acquittal of Mark Camilleri, editor of student newspaper Ir-Realta and writer Alex Vella Gera, who had been accused of publishing pornographic and obscene material.
The party said the court had effectively underlined the point that authors and writers should not be arraigned on criminal proceedings for publishing fiction, more so when the plot was one which shocked and criticised society through the strong realism that was used.
The party said it felt that the law against the distribution of porn and obscene material should be used for their purpose only, and not to threaten imprisonment for authors and writers.
It urged the government not to appeal the sentence and instead to modernise the laws on freedom of artistic expression, in agreement with the opposition.
Following the court judgement this morning, Mr Camilleri said an apology was the least that University Rector Juanito Camilleri could do after having reported the case, and added that it would be good if he stepped down.
Mr Vella Gera described the verdict as a step for freedom of expression in Malta and said artists would therefore not feel they should resort to self-censorship.
The case was decided by Magistrate Audrey Demicoli.
Mr Vella Gera had written the article entitled Li tkisser sewwi, a graphic piece of fiction about sexual violence.
The newspaper was distributed at the University before being banned and reported to the police by Prof Camilleri.
The editor and the writer were accused of distributing obscene or pornographic material and for undermining public morals or decency, under both the Criminal Code and the Press Act.
For the Criminal Code charge Mr Vella Gera faced a prison term of up to six months and/or a fine of up to €465.87 while the Press Act contemplates a maximum of three months in prison and/or a fine.
The 1,300-word story was a first-person narrative by a sex-craved Maltese man who spoke in very degrading and sexual terms about women, whom he treats like objects.
It received mixed reviews, with some saying it was insulting and offensive to women and others interpreting it as a story aimed at exposing this pathetic but prevalent mentality, as the author said he intended. Some also said the story was weak or unappealing but defended it in terms of free speech.
Mr Camilleri had said that if the issue went to court he would be prepared to go all the way to the European Court of Human Rights on the basis of violation of fundamental human rights.
COURT'S CONSIDERATIONS
The court said the prosecution had produced no evidence to define public morality in Malta and how it had been infringed. The court felt that public morality was something which changed over time, and what offended public morals 20 or 30 years ago did not necessarily do so now as realities changed, including the media.
Furthermore, the publication was limited to students of the University and the Junior College, who were mature students who had free access to a variety of media including books, newspapers and the internet.
It had not been shown how Ir-Realta offended their morality.
The writer had exercised his freedom of expression through a literary work and no crime had resulted, the court said.
See blog
http://www.timesofmalta.com/blogs/view/20110314/andrew-borg-cardona/some-good-news
142 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Lisa Micallef-Grimaud
Mar 23rd 2011, 22:01
Progress and freedom of artistic representation at long last! This is a good sign for Malta as we journey towards a more just future with regards to the literary movement. Lady Justice know her rights - and her art. The immediate concern is that Camilleri and Vella Gera should never have been put on trial for having published this piece of writing in the first place. It looks like the beginning of a new literary age for our country. I hope artists take good advantage of that. This proves we're not in the Victorian era after all. George Bataille, Henry Miller, Anais Nin and Charles Bukowski were among the influential writers causing outrage for their pornographic material in their day. Despite the controversy, they never did make the headlines for public indecency. This is only our first step forward. We all need to grow up to mature as a nation.
C Ellul
Mar 16th 2011, 20:43
Now we expect Lou Bondi to invite Magistrate Audrey Demicoli to read live the best of the best of this illuminating publication of the authors artistic expression.
The authors and their immediate relatives ,The council of women and the leader of the PL should be invited to attend and applaud.
After all it is a new branch in Maltese Literature.
Joe Xuereb
Mar 16th 2011, 13:59
1)There's no such thing as bad or good art. Art is either beautiful(as in meaningful, uplifting) or ugly(as in gratuitous)'.
Tracey Emin's unmade bed is obviously symbolic, a metaphor for the artist's frame of mind, or opinion, on an aspect of life generally, and hers in particular. It's our duty to find out what she means (necessary having moved from 'in-your-face' beauty of an exquisite bowl of fruit [but what's that incongruous fly/lizard among the luscious apples? - just food for thought. Find out]). Now, one may not agree with whatever the unmade bed stands for in Tracey's mind but we cannot disallow her her self-expression. I'll give a hint as a startoff. A bed is where we're born, rest, and die (hopefully). But a bed is also a metaphor/symbol of much that awaits a man/woman between birth and death. Is this so difficult to grasp? Must we remain stuck in painterly pictures and damn the Emins or Hirsts of this world because they disgust us, but subliminally, they terrify us?
Students (and people generally) can choose to learn much from this. Or they can choose to remain stuck in the mire (aka ignorance, the sanctimonious type).
continued
Joe Xuereb
Mar 16th 2011, 13:38
2) Li tista` sewwi is indeed beautiful (as in meaningful, UPLIFTINGg). Depends how one approaches it. If the onlooker is nostril deep in euphemisms and handles stuff as in 'jaqbdu bil-karta' (obsessively squeamish), then that onlooker had better shut all windows and doors to basic realities and - good luck to him/her.
If I may fault Vella Gera, it's that he assumed the intelligence of his readership. Can't really blame him. These are Uni students after all.
Students (and people generally) can choose to learn much from this. Or they can choose to remain stuck in the mire (aka ignorance, the sanctimonious type).
Joe Xuereb
Mar 16th 2011, 13:33
1)Quoting myself: 'There's no such thing as bad or good art. Art is either beautiful(as in meaningful/uplifting) or ugly(as in gratuitous)'.
Tracey Emin's unmade bed is obviously symbolic, a metaphor for the artist's frame of mind, or opinion, on an aspect of life generally and hers in particular. It is our duty to find out what she means (necessary having moved from 'in-your-face' beauty of an exquisite bowl of fruit (but what's that incongruous fly/lizard among the rosy apples? - just food for thought. Find out). Now, one may not agree with whatever the unmade bed stands for in Tracey's mind but we cannot disallow her her self-expression. But I'll give a hint as a startoff. A bed is where we're born, rest, and die in(hopefully). But a bed is also a metapher/symbol of much that awaits a man/woman between birth and death. Is this so difficult to grasp. Must we remain stuck in painterly pictures and damn the Emins or Hirsts of this world because they disgust us, but subliminally, they terrify us?
Students (and people generally) can choose to learn much from this. Or they can choose to remain stuck in the mire (aka ignorance, the sanctimonious type).continued
Joe Xuereb
Mar 16th 2011, 11:49
Mr. Korsten, I don't think you are in a position to state obviously what, or what not, I am familiar with. Art is still (to the amateurs) about pretty flowers in pretty vases. Or ecstatic saintly eyes rolling their way to heaven. But it is now much more, commensurate with thinking people (those who think), those who take on board the World Wide Web. So, Emin and Picasso are both 'beautiful', to those who've done their homework. Obviously.
Thank you for your attention Peter. Much appreciated.
Karl Consiglio
Mar 15th 2011, 18:21
Good on you Alex,
Aw Malta jitkelmu fuq l-arti qishom qeghdin jaghmlu l-hobz biz-zejt.
Joe Xuereb
Mar 15th 2011, 15:36
There's no such thing as bad or good art. Art is either beautiful(as in meaningful, uplifting) or ugly(as in gratuitous).
Maltese society does euphemism very well. This piece of literature uses four letter words that the Maltese cannot stomach. That's all. So, Li tista' sewwi is as valid as any biblical parable which exhorts the holy how NOT to behave by example. That's all it is.
The problem with euphemisms is that they make necessary sex education that much more difficult to get across to those who urgently need it. L-iskruplu jservi biss biex izomm in-nies fl-injuranza u l-jasar ta' spiritwalita` tal-wicc, superficjali - jekk minix sejjer zball, illum il-gurnata nghidulha 'fazulla' - ili nieqes minn Malta hamsin sena (hollow scruples get one nowhere).
Peter Korsten
Mar 15th 2011, 19:27
"There's no such thing as bad or good art."
You're obviously not familiar with Tracey Enim. :)
Joe Xuereb
Mar 15th 2011, 15:34
There's no such thing as bad or good art. Art is either beautiful(as in meaningful) or ugly(as in gratuitous).
Maltese society does euphemism very well. This piece of literature uses four letter words that the Maltese cannot stomach. That's all. So, Li tista' sewwi is as valid as any biblical parable which exhorts the holy how NOT to behave by example. That's all it is.
The problem with euphemisms is that they make necessary sex education that much more difficult to get across to those who urgently need it. L-iskruplu jservi biss biex izomm in-nies fl-injuranza u l-jasar ta' spiritwalita` tal-wicc, superficjali - jekk minix sejjer zball, illum il-gurnata nghidulha 'fazulla' - ili nieqes minn Malta hamsin sena (hollow scruples get one nowhere).
Peter Agius
Mar 15th 2011, 14:49
Congratulations to Vella Gera! So now he is in the league with Salinger, Hemingway, Masters, Tolstoy and the rest. Good luck and good riddance.
Mario Vella
Mar 16th 2011, 01:19
your assessment of the situation might just about place you in Confucius' ballpark.
Wow Peter Agius. You've read 'Catcher in the rye'? I mean REALLY? AND Tolstoy as well? My oh my.
Any further namedropping? How could you ommit Shakespeare? That most unadultareted of writers? As a Times commentator you should feel dutybound to namedrop the Bard. That alone vindicates ANY claim....ANY
dvella
Mar 15th 2011, 14:26
This clearly shows the LP wanting to win back some votes from university students and the younger generation!!!
but it's just an old game and everybody knows it!!
dvella
Mar 15th 2011, 14:22
artistic expression - WHAT???? Lord have mercy on us!! So what the likes of Shakespeare etc are called then - the gone idiots???????
MBorg
Mar 15th 2011, 14:05
@ Albert Gauci Cunningham
I love your choice of words. You agree that ths story is " Full of obscenities, it is vulgar and disgusting. " your words not mine
So please can you let us know what there is in this " Work of art ". that one can praise and create an " intelligent discussion " on ? It is more a case of burn it and forget it. It is not worth the paper it is printed on.
Adrian Buckle
Mar 15th 2011, 15:43
@MBorg Maybe you're right. I happen to disagree. I think it is thought provoking in that it captures excellently the maltese macho way of thought. But let's say, for the sake of argument, that it is worthless. Alex Vella Gera still has the right to publish it. As Voltaire said, "I might not agree with everything you say, but I will defend to death your right to say it." I happen to find our kappillan's speeches from the pulpit disgusting, homophobic and crass, but I would never dream of censoring him.
Frans Attard
Mar 15th 2011, 10:36
I wish to express my solidarity with Profs Juanito Camilleri. I am sure that the majority of the population would have done the same as he did.
Alfred Falzon
Mar 15th 2011, 10:29
Congratulations PL for your newly discovered moral fibre! So now we know what kind of moderates and progressives we have aspiring to take the reigns of government in the not too distant future!
To defend such dirt and literary trash is an insult to our people's intelligence and the PL should stop playing fashionable. It has already stooped too low on this particular issue and has lost its credibility!
Enough is enough!
David Caruana
Mar 15th 2011, 11:26
What insults "our people's" intelligence is that Vella Gera and Camilleri were taken to court in the first place.
isabelle borg
Mar 15th 2011, 14:09
are you one of those who claims he has never watched porn or pornographic material in his entire life?
Alfred Falzon
Mar 15th 2011, 21:48
@David Caruana and @Isabelle Borg
It's not a question of being "holier than thou", but there should be a modicum of morality left in us to protect our young generation from today's onslaught of licentiousness and sleaze.
Your reaction speaks volumes. You seem to encourage such dirt accessible at one point in time to Sixth Form students and minors!
Indeed, the PL is expected to reflect over its unwarranted jubilance and ask its two MPs Owen Bonnici and Evarist Bartolo to refrain from associating their so-called "progressive" party with such tripe!
The great majority of the Maltese condemn such shameful filth and those behind it!
We are not afraid to call a spade a spade in this age of unrestrained indulgence and look forward to an in-depth discussion on pornographic literature with the two above-mentioned gentlemen when the occasion arises.
Freedom of expression is one thing and we agree ABSOLUTELY, but ABUSE of it is another thing!
Let's not overdo it by being simply DISGUSTING!
Christopher Debattista
Mar 15th 2011, 10:20
Well Said Mr Farrugia. We always create a storm in a tea-cup and forget about the real problems going around us. That is why this world is rotting :/
Timmy Farrugia
Mar 15th 2011, 09:56
Victory for common Sense!!! to all of those who find it offensive... dont read it!!! no one is forcing you to!!! i read part of it, found it stupid and boring and guess what....i stopped reading it and did not give it a second thought.
C Muscat
Mar 15th 2011, 08:57
I still think this was out of place and ahead of time. The PL should keep out of it because this is not political but a matter of moral values.
To all those that mentioned other bad things such as violence, paedofile and all other immoral and bad physical things I condemn just the same. If everyone finds ways to respect each other we will be living much better.
I would like to ask what would we have missed if we did not have this type of pornography writing?
Michael Grech
Mar 15th 2011, 09:52
What would we have missed if you hadn't posted your comment? Absolutely nothing, I can assure you. Still, it is essential that you have the right to post your, to my mind illogical, comment. Freedom of speech is not a matter of 'missing' , 'requiring' etc. It is a question of RIGHTS.
Karl Bald
Mar 15th 2011, 08:38
@e.schembri....you either didn't read any newspapers at all or else never lived here...each and everyday the sun pg2 is a photo of a topless girl (full page)...what about that?
E.Schembri
Mar 15th 2011, 10:05
errr...helloooo...
I am talking about university publications, not the general media!!
And neither am I saying that the campus was a holy place, far from that, but you would never find a university publication of that sort.
Frans Attard
Mar 15th 2011, 08:29
Now the PL has the 'go ahead' to publish Vella Gera's article on the front page of its weekly 'Kulladd' for everyone to admire its 'artistic' element.
Kenneth Cassar
Mar 15th 2011, 15:33
The story is not appropriate for family newspapers. Regardless of questions of artistic merit and/or obscenity, I think we can all agree that it was meant for adults only.
Frans Attard
Mar 15th 2011, 19:47
'Ir-Realta' setet facilment ittiehdet id-dar ta' l-istudenti u giet f'idejn huthom iz-zhar u dan il-fatt il-magistrat ma kkonsidratux, ma nafx ghaliex Sur Cassar.
Victor Vella
Mar 15th 2011, 07:55
Well done Mr Camilleri. We are living in the 21st century. Those who feel are offended turn the page or turn the channel. We are living in a pluralistic society not in a society that once was dominated by the church and people that had access to information , the elites, that manipulated the brains of society. Today information is cheap, accessible and affordable by everyone. The university of Malta has to open horizons and not close them to the few elites that govern it. Well done. The courts had done one right.
Oscar Cassar
Mar 15th 2011, 00:50
Prosit...
N.Grima
Mar 15th 2011, 00:01
While glad of the acquittal, the PL has absolutely no business putting such pressure on the AG. The AG's job is to interpret and follow the law, and most certainly not change it or distort it or, God help us, follow the instructions of a political party! The separation of powers (trias politica) is SACRED in a republic!
David Borg
Mar 14th 2011, 22:44
Freeedom of expression is an important principle but as with all rights has its limits.
I have not read the judgement, but I think an appeal will be introduced as there are cogent legal and rational arguments to overturn the seemingly specious arguments made in this judgement.
E Formosa
Mar 14th 2011, 20:49
U kemm sar ghandna ammiraturi tal-hmieg u l-hama go pajjizna !! Progressivi li, ghax fallew fil-morali nisranija kellhom jaqghu ghar-religjon modernista ....il-pornografija.......fejn ta bla sinsla jhossuhom komdi. Kulhadd sar artist.....ghax kullhadd jaghamel xogholu kull fil-ghodu....u dik ukoll saret arti.....ghal min ma jafx jaghamel ahjar. Dawn il-kummentaturi qed joghoxew ghax qed jaraw lil min ma jirraprezenta lil hadd jiddettalna x'inhu tajjeb u hazin skond l-ideologija tieghu. B'sentenza xejn originali. Anzi cut and paste ta sekulari ewropejj. Xalata ghall-qasab li jixxeru ma kull rih, ghax bla principji jghiru ghal min ghandu ambjent morali jridu jaghamluh mandra.
David Caruana
Mar 15th 2011, 08:41
E Formosa
Veru sa mniehrek tara u ma tistax tirrealizza li f'Malta mhux kulhadd nisrani u hafna jigu jaqghu u jqumu f'jghid il-qassis minn fuq il-pulptu jew x'jghid il-ktieb tal-hrejjef tieghek.
Trid tkun tassew mohhok maghluq biex minghalik li kull min mhux nisrani, m'ghandux moralita'. Bil-Kristjanezmu kollhu tieghek, ma tantx qadt toghmod biex tghajjar lil- haddiehor.
Allan Gatt
Mar 14th 2011, 18:58
Apology nothing. The rector should resign to make up for this outrage. It is important to send a message to people in authority that freedom of speech must be safeguarded at all costs. Doesn't it strike anybody as ridiculous and disgusting that a man charged with the dissemination of ideas should be the one trying to stamp them out? I want the rector to resign. He should be made an example of. I want compensation for this insult.
Franco Farrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 19:33
There are so many things that I want to happen - but they don't. I want many messages to be imparted, but they are not. So why should you have what you want?
E Mifsud
Mar 14th 2011, 18:48
At long last, a breathe of credibility for our courts. Well done to Mark and Alex. I strongly urge the PL to present urgent amendments to our archaic and outdated laws. No more nonsense of this sort please, the University is not (I hope) a play school.
MBorg
Mar 14th 2011, 18:05
Why is it that in Catholic Malta we have nothing in the law that defines public morality. We have this case and we had the case of the lap dancer who was charged by the police but set free because our law is not clear in what offends public morals.
Public morality might change over time, but what is vulgar and blasphemous surely does not change with time, unless we have reached a stage where anything goes.
Franco Farrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 19:39
Have you ever been to the village square's 'hwienet tax-xorb'? Or bandclubs for that matter? Or any other bar? Haven't you heard the constant blasphemy taking place? And what about the blasphemy we hear during village festas, and any other openair events? Haven't you heard blasphemy before? Then, let us arrest and take the court three-quarter of the Maltese people, policemen included, before we arrest the mentioned writer. Hallina, man!
MBorg
Mar 14th 2011, 20:12
@ Franco Farrugia We really are progressing man.! So according to you it is Ok that we have now reached a stage where a publication ment for University students is full of the same tasteful,polite, refined words one normally finds in " hwienet tax-xorb and village festas." Malta should be proud of its University if this is the case.
A.Gauci Cunningham
Mar 14th 2011, 20:33
MBorg---My, my it takes long for some to get it!! The point of the story was not to glorify the attitude or to promote it but to demonstrate it. It is precisely the author's "job" to instigate discussions and provoke reactions that challenge the status quo and the macho/sexist culture which is still prevalent in all of Malta's social classes. Unlike what you and many others may think literary provocation is a very legitimate tool which can be used, even through reflected obscenities, to create an intelligent and informed discussion. Then again if you still find it too distasteful to read and discuss you can always refrain from doing so.
Albert Gauci Cunningham
Mar 14th 2011, 16:58
Art has ,since time immemorial, been a reflection of the society in which it is produced. I know this is obvious for many readers of the times.com but it seems for many others art (whether drawn, written or otherwise) is simply so when it portrays what pleases them. Art is only so when it stays away from the inconvenient truth of a hypocritically conservative island like ours. Well sorry guys!! This story might be vulgar and disgusting but it is a perfect reflection of the thwarted and sexist minds of many out there. Go to a Kazin, to Paceville or to any other place and you'll hear guys talking about their opposite sex as if she were a piece of meat. This story accepts (but does not agree with) this reality and portrays it as it is with some "colourful" language to make it a tad more effective. Don't know why all this fuss! You don't like it....you just don't read it!!
C Muscat
Mar 15th 2011, 11:23
As stated a question of RIGHTS. That is exactly my remark. I do not care whether it is literature or pornography but next time do not send it to my 16 year old daughter now because she will have time later on to see whatever she likes without anyone abusing the system. The way this was sent was not RIGHT. He may write whatever he likes like me and you putting these remarks But not to be sent directly to All and Sundry.
John Fenech
Mar 14th 2011, 16:55
Public morality refers to moral and ethical standards enforced in a society, by law or police work or social pressure, and applied to public life, to the content of the media, and to conduct in public places. Pornography in literature or satire form comprises fictional and factual stories and accounts of human sexual relationships which have the power to or are intended to arouse the reader sexually. Satire is primarily a literary genre or form, although in practice it can also be found in the graphic and performing arts. Was the material in question pornographic? Or was it a case of Moral panic? On the other hand which are the ethical standards that had changed in the past 20 years, does the law reflect this change? If the case in question did not infringe the law why was the public money squandered?
Natasha Borg
Mar 14th 2011, 16:19
@Mark Biwwa - You've hit the nail on the head there. This sad society is happy to condone violence on women but are too holier than thou (read 'hypocrites') to accept a crude literary piece. It would be far more productive if people channel their time and energy towards lobbying for justice against those who perpetrate violence against women if they are so concerned about the issue; and for the authorities to use their resources towards catching and incriminating such people, instead of allowing them to get away with it as is currently the case. Onus is particularly on women in this case.
David Farrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 16:02
If i were the university rector, I would hide in shame. He should definitely resign his post. No backward thinking person should head such an institution as a University.
J Farrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 15:26
Since when has the Malta Labour party wants to impose its will on the police corps, not to appeal this vulgar and obscene judgement of the presiding magistrate? Once more Labour wants to dictate to the police on how to do its duty. It is the Government which should order the police what to do and not to the contrary. The Opposition imposing its will on the majority of the people. How sick of this Labour party.
Mark-Anthony Fenech
Mar 14th 2011, 15:43
*Yawn* If the PL doesn't comment, it is being passive, if it does comment then it is imposing its will eh?
Marylu Alosia d'Agostino
Mar 14th 2011, 16:03
@ J Farrugia
The Labour Party is not imposing its will on anyone. It is simply requesting that sense prevails and the AG does not appeal this sentence, which after all, is mindful of artistic expression, is level headed and is fair.
David Caruana
Mar 14th 2011, 16:52
Which majority?
I'm not a PL fan but I wouldn't call the PN a majority, especially now that it seems that Dr.Gonzi is on the verge of losing his majority even in Parliament.
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 17:53
According to the article, "[PL] urged the government not to appeal the sentence"
They urged the government, not the police. Besides, there's a difference between "urging" and "imposing their will". Anybody - even individuals such as myself - has every right to urge the government not to waste more money on this case, which in my opinion should never have been started in the first place. The decision is the correct one and I hope that it sets a precedent.
Kenneth Cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 18:35
Ehm...the police cannot appeal. Its not their job.
E Mifsud
Mar 14th 2011, 18:41
How sick of the PL? Hallo, this is 2011, not the middle ages. How sick of the University to even think of taking its students to court, the supposedly cradle of liberal thought and expression. No wonder we have had so few uprisings in our country, we have a dead University.
M Buhagiar
Mar 14th 2011, 15:24
There is no such thing as a moral or immoral book; books are well written or badly written. ~Oscar Wilde, Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
Alfred Grech
Mar 14th 2011, 15:19
I've noticed that most cases handled by Audrey Demicoli carry with them prudence and common sense. Hope we'll see her nominated for a judge very soon. Prosit your Honor - you're a ray of light in our judicial system.
J Bonnici
Mar 14th 2011, 15:01
To all those people who disagree with this article and verdict:
If I write a story about the negative effects of smoking, would you assume that I am promoting smoking??
Has anyone ever forced you to read a story or article without your consent? I highly doubt it.
If you truly are disturbed by the contents of the story in question, GOOD! THAT'S THE POINT!!! All news companies know that the best way to grab someone's attention is with a shock factor. Perhaps it would be a better idea, under the circumstances, to direct your disgust and anger towards the REALITY of this country. Like this: http://markbiwwa.com/2011/03/14/violence-and-obscenity-maltese-style/
M Grima
Mar 14th 2011, 14:52
One step up to freedom but a hell of a lot more to go. I am just saddened that the students of this Island for the most part were quite willing to stay silent,either through ignorance of freedom and what it really means or just as likely" F U Jack,willing to do your bidding and not rock the boat as long as you don't touch my stipend" Can we ever hope for the age of enlightenment to leave it's rays on these shores?
MArio Vella
Mar 14th 2011, 14:42
by that very same reasoning everyone is entitled to absolutely inconsequential,pointless remarks such as yours Mr.Borg.
john borg
Mar 14th 2011, 14:20
Another illustrious judgement from out enlightened court where nothing means anything anymore. anyone can do as he pleases because of human rights and freedom of expressions... everyone is an author, a journalist, a columnist and can write and do as they please. why don't we dispose of the country's laws!
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 17:48
You have the right to read the article or not.
Considering that you hear FAR worse on the streets, and you can't stop yourself from hearing them, a written article is intrinsically less offensive whatever it contains.
Mark-Anthony Fenech
Mar 14th 2011, 14:09
One can't underestimate the effect literature has on people. For example, after reading The Lord of the Rings, I developed a habit of throwing all golden rings I found into the fire and checking for magic inscriptions. When I finally ...found what looked writing on my grandmother's wedding ring I carried it all the way to Mount Etna (it was the only volcano I could reach on my limited budget) and threw it in, after biting off my own finger. My grandmother was very distressed, and claims to this day that "Love, Joe", does not constitute a magic inscription. So in short, there is some merit in those claims that LTS could promote violence towards women.
:p
Trevor Zahra
Mar 14th 2011, 15:52
Mark Anthony ---- .excellent wit...well done :-)
Nick
Mar 14th 2011, 16:43
I must say that I am in full agreement with Mr. Fenech here, for I too fell victim to the negative effects of literature back in sixth form. After reading Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, I stopped studying Chemistry and Biology to became a Buddhist mechanic. I am now well aware of how foolish I was. Shaving my hair bald makes it really tough to get the motor oil off my scalp.
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 17:45
That's nothing. Thanks to all the cartoons I watched as a kid, I gained the ability to fly and fire laser beams out of my eyes.
Kenneth Zammit Tabona
Mar 15th 2011, 13:41
At last ..........some humour! Well done. I hope you bought your granny another ring miskina!
I wonder if I would be arrested were I to exhibit erotica?
Ramon Mizzi
Mar 14th 2011, 14:06
Excellent news for Freedom of Expression, Mark & Alex.
C.Sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 14:05
Well done! Common sense prevailed.
Claude Lacoste
Mar 14th 2011, 13:53
It is indeed Voltaire fighting for freedom of speech.
Ernest Vella
Mar 14th 2011, 13:51
Forsi ghalhekk Malta saret iz-zibel ta l-Ewropa? Vera ghandna biex niftahru...Kieku kif qeghdin ninsinwaw...Sodoma u Gomorra kienu bliet moderni fejn is-sewwa gie ikkastigat u l-hazin gie mholli. Il-Qorti waqghat fir-redikolu...Keep it up.
NB. Ma hax gurament il-giehna fuq Kurcifiss ukoll...xejn inqas mill-bewsa ta Guda.
Jeremy N Grech
Mar 15th 2011, 00:39
LOL l-inteligenza ta' dan il-kumment laqtitni ferm, allura ddecidejt li nghatik reply biex nifrahlek talli irnexxielek tigbidli l-attenzjoni bil-livell atroci ta stup.. err INTELIGENZA li biha tkellimt.
Mario Vella
Mar 14th 2011, 13:49
YES Joseph.....(Shock! Horror!)
they should be mature enough but then again some of the naysyers on this particular space might be parents as well so you never know really
J Brincat
Mar 14th 2011, 13:36
This verdict gave me some comfort.
But reading some of the blogs make me realise that I am simply blowing in the wind! (with thousand of apologies to the great Bob Dylan).
Dr. John Zammit
Mar 14th 2011, 13:33
Well done! A victory to democracy and freedom of speech. Malta has to think European and not continue living in the middle ages. That is why we are now members of the European Union to be Liberal. Now we hope that certain persons especially head of departments, members of parliament who are morally scandalized by progressive laws and so on will be removed both by the authorities and the m.p's by the voters.
J Farrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 16:38
A victory to democracy and freedom of speech?? it is a victory for our perversely sick society which wants divorce, abortions, euthanasia, gay marraiges and all the dirt of sodoma and gomorrha. The minority wants to rule this country by imposing its vulgarities on the majority. My only hope is that the people, the silent majority will stop all this obscenity when the referendum comes our way.
Joseph Aquilina
Mar 14th 2011, 13:29
"Junior College, who were mature students" - Does this mean that in the eyes of the law, Junior College are to be considered as Adults?
Max Bartolo
Mar 14th 2011, 13:44
No. If they meant 'adults' they would have said adults not mature students. Neither phrase implies the other. Why are people so intent on twisting words to suit their own agendas? If it says 'mature students' then that's what it means. Period.
Joseph Mizzi
Mar 14th 2011, 13:46
Anybody, having access to the Internet, without having parents or guardians blocking certain content from his/her viewing, is to be regarded as mature enough to read Vella Gera's narrative. The court was right in making this declaration.
All the rest is hypocrisy.
wally vella-zarb
Mar 14th 2011, 13:19
At last! A sensible interpretation and application of a controversial law. That was the easy part.
The difficult part lies in persuading some of the people commenting on this site that, before they write to condemn they ought to first of all read what they are condemning, preferably after learning the difference between writing that is plain narrative, aimed at exposing what happens and literature, which has higher aspirations. Maybe then they will understand that, rather than insulting women or promoting violence against them, this piece was aimed at exposing what is not at all uncommon in this country of 'high moral values'. The recently aborted court case that involved physical violence against a woman, an act that was caught on video, is a case in point.
This, unfortunately, will not be so easy.
Peter Micallef
Mar 14th 2011, 13:04
AVG can write whatever he wants to write....
BUT, a clear warning should have been printed on the front of the magazine to warn potential readers about its content - a simple 18+ / 16+ / Parent Advisory sign would have been enough.
I know that they were being handed out at University, but what if one of the students took it home and left it on the kitchen table and his/her younger brother/sister went to read it? Who is going to be responsible for that then? Is it up to the reader to check each and every page of every publication to make sure that there isn't any excess profanity/obscenity?
G.Schembri
Mar 14th 2011, 15:51
What if grandmama had read that piece, she might have understood it. As for young children it was far above them, unless these same children are exposed to vulgar words. Here we are not talking about pictures or films we are talking about the written word and to read you have to understant and enjoy what you are reading or else you just stop reading.
Mark-Anthony Fenech
Mar 14th 2011, 13:02
What some are failing to grasp its that Li Tkisser Sewwi is a story not an autobiographical account. Alex Vella Gera was not writing a story against women, he wanted to expose the kind of mentality prevalent amongst some men in Malta. According to those arguing against the judgement, there is no difference between a an account written from the perspective of an SS officer for instance and a piece of Nazi propaganda. So according to you Milton's Paradise Lost, while of vastly greater literary value than Li Tkisser Sewwi, promots Satanism.
And a woman handed down the sentence..
Mark Biwwa
Mar 14th 2011, 12:56
In other news, a real life assault on a woman, seen by 14000 people on YouTube results in a Euro175 fine. We let stories get to us while the real deal walks away scot free: http://markbiwwa.com/2011/03/14/violence-and-obscenity-maltese-style/
Franco Farrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 12:50
1. Congratulations to the Realta' editor and the writer in question - as I stated many times before, it was stupid to take this matter to court.
2. Equally stupid, no, immature, is the cry for the University rector to apologise - let alone 'step down' over this issue.
Joe Xuereb
Mar 14th 2011, 12:50
@ C. Muscat u Petra Cassar. Kemm ser indumu nghidu - il-kontenut ta' din il-bicca litteratura hu psikologiku u mhux sesswali (studenti li ntelligenti bizzejjed biex waslu sa' l-Universita` suppost li jifhmu dan). Din il-kitba hi ezatt bhall tant fil-Bibbja fejn hemm taqsimijiet grafici b'messagg car kif il-bniedem MA GHANDUX IGIB RUHU. X'inhu wisq difficli biex tifhmu dan? Il-problema, l-istumbling block hi li l-iskrupluz jara dnub u l-offiza f'kollox ghax mhux kapaci, ma ghandux permess janalizza u 'jaqra' kollox superficjalment.
Jubilate Alex Vella Gera u Mark Camilleri. U apologija f'waqtha minn ghand ir-rettur ta' universita` - jista jappella imma ma naghtihx (natihx?) parir - li ghandha bzonn twessa` x-xefaq jekk veru trid li tkun onorata.
I only read up to C.Muscat's comments. Il-bqija jistennew, ghal meta jkolli mument. Kollox f'waqtu. I am sure there are a number of congratulatory comments. As for the rest, wasal iz-zmien li tohorgu minn qoxortkom, tahsbu kemmxejn 'barra l-kaxxa'.
J Brincat
Mar 14th 2011, 12:41
Welcome to the modern world!
Very well pleased with end result.
Mario Vella
Mar 14th 2011, 12:34
Mr Schembri needs a reality check as regards foreign universities' attitude toward such matters. Heh I can already imagine the board members at Oxford falling over themselves over such 'shocking' and 'depraved' activity (How ironic that the most plausable affidavit in d efence of Mr.Gera was handed in by one of only a handful of locals whose educational standard was deemed worthy enough of an academic institution such as Harvard)
Dear Ethelbert please don't waste bandwith.....your time will be more productively spent inspecting your hometown's construction infringements or lack of proper workmanship (oops...il-bankina mhux invellata!! Ejja niktbu lil-Editur)
E.Schembri
Mar 14th 2011, 14:35
I can assure you, I am very aware of the reality in foreign universities as I spent 3 years at a UK university reading for a Masters degree, and never did I see an article of this sort.
And yes, the university boards are very strict as all publications must be of a level in line with the universities guidelines, with regards to respect, tolerance, plagiarism, collusion etc.
However, you are right, no university board will fall over themselves for such an article, they will simply dismiss the student from his studies with a simple email, together with a hard copy posted to your address!
L. Cutajar
Mar 14th 2011, 12:33
Another flop by the Law Courts. It's a shame on the Courts to acquit both persons for their obscene material published to students some of whom still minors. It seems that the Court has lost its bearing.
f.bugelli
Mar 14th 2011, 12:32
To all of you crusaders of morality,grow up.All you had to do was let the book be read.Some people would have been disgusted,others would have found it interesting, but calling the police, going to courts, smells like a taliban country mentality.Let the people decide for themselves and not treating them as kindergarten/primary kids,where i will tell you what is good for you and what is bad.After all,that is what other free democratic nations do, or i am wrong.
E.Schembri
Mar 14th 2011, 12:11
Is this what we are feeding our university students, pornographic material?
I don't see this as a win for freedom of expression, it was never the issue here. I see this as a blow to the level and standard of the University of Malta. The university should publish literature in its newspaper that is beneficial to the students studies, social interaction and moral responsibilities, together with some decent humour.
Anyone who wishes to view/read pornographic material such as Mr. Vella Gera's article, can do this in the privacy of his room, and not come out chanting freedom of expression slogans!
No wonder so many youths are now turning to foreign universities to pursue their studies as our national university is becoming joke with very little recognition.
D.Galea
Mar 14th 2011, 12:45
Aren't University students to be the elite youth of the educated and maturity? What kind of University is one which has students which cannot handle such realities? Feeding them bees and birds isn't beneficial. You for one amongst other put very little faith in Maltese students, this is the real shame.
JAFarrugia
Mar 14th 2011, 13:02
This is the problem with people like you, you have to stick your nose in what other adults do or want to do, if i want to watch/ read pornography(If that's what you want to call it) i will, I'm an adult i make my own choices, I don't need some goody goody pretending to be all prim and proper telling me what to do.
Too many people sticking there nose where it doesn't belong.
As for Juanito, OWNED... BIG TIME.
E.Schembri
Mar 14th 2011, 14:10
@JAFarrugia,
First of all, no one is sticking his nose in what you do, trust me, no one cares!!!
Did I ever tell you not to watch pornography??? So please read twice before commenting!!!
On the contrary, it is Mr Vella Gera that dumped his XXX rated article on the unexpecting university audience whether they wanted or not!
Secondly, no one is acting all prim and proper as everyone had his fair share at some point in his life, including me.
All I said is that publishing pornographic material on a university newspaper is of bad taste and destroying the credibility, standard and reputation of the university. Apart from that, some female students considered the article as offensive and degrading, so where has your respect gone to what other fellow students feel?
Seems you are not much of an adult after all!
Joseph Camilleri
Mar 14th 2011, 16:29
I think it was a student publication and not a University publication.
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 12:07
Wow, a flash of sanity at last.
Mario Vella
Mar 14th 2011, 12:06
the sweetest part about his whole mess is that a woman handed down the judgement . So much for the 'National Council of Women' Petra, Rita and your ilk.
The only degradation women will be experiencing lies at the hands of your would be feminist movements. A most counter-productive movement if ever there was one. Anyone wishing to shoot himself in the foot?
P Agius
Mar 14th 2011, 11:57
Can I write a similar fiction on black people or two weights two measures will apply?
Kenneth Cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 12:21
Try it. You'll find out soon enough.
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 17:41
I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to write about a racist who speaks negatively about black people.
john sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 11:45
Justice prevails!
Petra Cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 11:24
A very sorry outcome in this verdict. I hope that the organisation for the advancement of women reacts strongly for this pittyfull verdict. So if someone writes an insulting letter like that against illigal immigrants he is breaking the law (and that is how it should be) but insulting women in such vulgarity it's ok.
Oh yes and it is considered as a step towards progress.
And the author said he intended to go all the way to the european court of appeal on the basis of violation of fundamental human rights. What human rights? Is it a human right to insult the female speaces? What next after this? Will it be legal to publish nude pictures.
I hope there is an appeal.
Wayne Flask
Mar 14th 2011, 11:55
I think this means you understood nothing of the story. It's actually a gruesome depiction of how some women are treated here in Malta. Maybe you feel it's okay that a man gets fined a pittance for beating his partner, but writing about it, hell no, that's a sorry outcome for justice.
Maybe it's time to get our heads out of the sand.
Mark-Anthony Fenech
Mar 14th 2011, 12:03
erm it's species not speaces :p
And it's a story for hell's sake, the author was not promoting violence against women..
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 12:16
@Petra: First of all, men and women belong to the same species (or "speaces").
Secondly, saying that there are men who have the sensitivity of a lump of clay towards women is not in itself insulting to women. It is, unfortunately, a fact.
Consider the difference between a film about WWII, and a nazi propaganda film. They both deal with the same subject, and the WWII film could show some terrible atrocities being committed, but they are not the same.
C Muscat
Mar 14th 2011, 11:22
Ma nahsibx li l-issue kellha tkun jekk hux letterarju jew le imma l-mod kif tqassam u lil min.
Jekk issa qed jahseb li hu aqwa mill bord ta l-universita allura xi haga ohra.
Jekk veru fih kontenut iktar letterarju milli sesswali allura seta jippromovih fil- fora universitarja imma mhux ibellghu lil kulhadd; din ma hix espressjoni literarja li tuza fuljett universitarju biex tghaddih lil kulhadd. Fil-fuljett messu qal li ghandu l-artiklu u min iridu jitlob ghalih. Nahseb li certi studenti fil-fond ta qalbhom dejjaqhom specjalment dawk li ma humiex interessati f'dak it-tip ta letteratura.
Nispera li ma nibqghux nigu mghoddija biz-zmien u min suppost jiddefendi l-morali pubblika ma jorqodx.
G.Schembri
Mar 14th 2011, 15:22
Nobody had to read it at gunpoint. I started reading it, found it not to my taste and stopped. I'm sure University students are mature enough to decide for themselves what to read and what not to read. These youths will in the near future hold important posts, when should we start to treat them as adults.
I would have expected you and others who like you came up in arms against this piece of literature to come out forcibly against the man who was filmed on U Tube brutally hitting a woman. That is the type of behaviour we should condemn, if anything Vella Gera's story should have made us discuss why women are still being used by men and how to stop such monsters from roaming our streets. I hope you complained when that man was not even given a suspended jail sentence, now that was an injustice against women's rights and not Vella Gera's story.
alfred micallef
Mar 14th 2011, 11:18
So anyone now can write using the type of language and won't be doing anything wrong if his story is published,But if the same person narrates his ideas to someone else in public using the same language would he be on the wrong side of the law?
Ramon Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 17:37
I should hope so. Imagine writing a book or drama in which one of the characters is supposedly a vulgar, foul-mouthed yob, but you can't use any form of vulgar words in the dialogue! You end up with this character and the village parish priest using exactly the same kind of language. Many Maltese dramas sound artificial and sterilised because of this. They're supposed to accurately depict a character with all its flaws.
R.Borg
Mar 14th 2011, 11:12
The 1,300-word story was a first-person narrative by a sex-craved Maltese man who spoke in very degrading and sexual terms about women, whom he treats like objects.
Any reactions from:
the National Council of Women?
David Caruana
Mar 14th 2011, 12:11
Did you even bother reading the article?!?!
"... a story aimed at EXPOSING this PATHETIC but prevalent mentality, as the author said he intended."
Franco Rizzo
Mar 14th 2011, 11:05
"A small but important step" - agree completely and the outcome is much favourable
"We have to point out that we don't know whether the police will appeal..." - wouldn't be surprised they would...
Christian Sciberras
Mar 14th 2011, 11:05
Why don't we award him something as well?
Maybe even help inspire secondary school students to follow his writing path!!
Then again, I can't expect any better from the heavily flawed justice system in Malta.
David Caruana
Mar 14th 2011, 11:58
Controversial writer Alex Vella Gera wins prize at Book Awards
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110121/local/controversial-writer-alex-vella-gera-wins-prize-at-book-awards
Ray Gatt
Mar 14th 2011, 13:07
You not agreeing with the verdict does not make it wrong. Freedom of expression is a right.
d.attard
Mar 14th 2011, 11:03
a brilliant day that may open a path for honest and intellectual discovery of what makes us tick...i personally found the piece a brilliant story of how 'love' hits a man who thought that love meant having sex with as many women as possible...i do not however agree on the apology part...this is such a great step forward that we should not losetime looking back... the rector is an intelligent man and i a sure he would have enough problems dealing with his own intellect without having to rub noses...prosit all thank you to all those who opened this window...and to those who feel disappointed i say that i can understand their disappointment but try to understand what it is all about beyong the single word...I have met so many people who were shocked by the piece who have not read it...i mean read it all within context...
frank grech
Mar 14th 2011, 10:59
FINALLY, some common sense from our law courts!
Jason Aquilina
Mar 14th 2011, 10:57
Following the outcome of this case, I strongly expect Prof Juanito Camilleri to resign and the dissolution/replacement of the current SDM body. Of course, this being Malta, this probably won't happen...
Luciano Mule Stagno
Mar 14th 2011, 10:57
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire (or one of his followers)
j.cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 10:56
What a sad day for our values, no wonder our society is sinking under the weight of materialism and paganism, is the magistrate also afraid to show her moral values in public, I want to see all our women's associations come out against this sentence, which is nothing but another push towards more disrespect for women in the name of freedom of speech.
David Caruana
Mar 14th 2011, 11:54
j.cassar,
Did you even bother to read the article?
"... interpreting it as a story aimed at EXPOSING this PATHETIC but prevalent mentality, as the AUTHOR SAID HE INTENDED."
P.S. What's wrong with paganism?! Your comment is highly insulting to pagans who just happen to worship a different god than yours.
Sandro Agius
Mar 14th 2011, 10:49
Jitlob apologija ta x'hiex? Talli rrapporta suspett ta ksur tal-ligi...hekk jonqos issa!!! Vera ghandna qorti serja dan il-pajjiz.
David Caruana
Mar 14th 2011, 10:43
Glad to hear such news
Saviour Debattista
Mar 14th 2011, 10:36
I hope that the issue will be laid to rest. In other words the sentence will not be appealed.
Mario Vella
Mar 14th 2011, 10:24
Good on you Frans...
a straightforward piece of writing falls under expression....however flawed it may be.
This case was primarily concerned with Freedom of Expression. Literary merits belonged elsewhere. I personally don't care what Abbot has to say in this regard. we could have done without the old guard throwing in thei 2c worth of literary criticism in this case. Be it as it may every writer worthy of note has constributed lesser works throughout a publishing carreer. I am not subscribing to your view that Vella Gera necessarily hit a wrong literary note with his article but that all his output and contributions to the local arts scene should have been taken into consideration in order to reach a sober decision.
Pace Marrtin
Mar 14th 2011, 10:17
Anyone to submit his resignation in this issue!!!!
Mark-Anthony Fenech
Mar 14th 2011, 10:12
Am very happy for Alex Vella Gera and Mark Camilleri :) A tiny step forward in this conservative country.
Jacques René Zammit
Mar 14th 2011, 11:11
From a legal point of view nothing much has budged. The court judgement is an interpretation of the law as is. The law has not changed. It was the same before LTS was published and remains the same after the judgement. Under that law the article was not deemed to be pornographic or obscene - that same law existed before and after the judgement.
It's not so much the law that is conservative as the mentality of those trying to misapply it.
Jeremy N Grech
Mar 15th 2011, 00:43
@ jaqcues .. still remains the fact that artists now should no longer be scared of no freedom of expression because the laws now are clear to everyone. So basically this was more a mentality change.
Mark Casha
Mar 14th 2011, 10:09
As they should be. Great news.
PGatt
Mar 14th 2011, 09:48
Finally a positive step in this pathetic, bigoted, ignorant, close-minded country of ours. And yes, I'd love to leave, but the government leaves very little in my pocket in order to pay the inefficient monster of laziness and iniquity we call public 'service'.
Frans Sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 09:42
Good. The whole thing shouldn't have reached that point in the first place. The whole issue, however, has little to do with literature. There are narratives and narratives. Read Porter Abbott and you will know what I mean. This was a straightforward piece of writing. Literature is something else.
Kenneth Cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 10:30
What do you mean by "This was a straightforward piece of writing"?
Frans Sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 11:10
I tend to agree with most of what you've written. It is best to keep the right perspective despite the impulsive reactions from both conservative as well as the modernists with whom I normally agree.
Frans Sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 11:13
If you read Porter Abbott you will understand what I mean. Go on, read the great literary critic, then come back with your opinion of him. If your understanding of literature is not enlightened by what you read I give up. No use discussing with people who cannot see the difference between a straightforward narrative and a literary one.
Kenneth Cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 12:17
So you tell me to look elsewhere for an explanation of what YOU wrote. Fair enough. You have the right to choose not to reply, even if mine was a fair question.
Frans Sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 12:22
Correction: The following was meant to be addressed to Mr Vella: "I tend to agree with most of what you've written. It is best to keep the right perspective despite the impulsive reactions from both conservative as well as the modernists with whom I normally agree."
I reiterate my original position, expressed months ago, that the text under review cannot, to my mind, be considered as 'literary' for reasons explained by the critic Porter Abbott who has made clear the underlying difference between ordinary narrative and the literary kind. Had the text we are discussing been really literary it would not have caused all the bruhaha and comments legitimately made by R. Borg, Petra Cassar and C. Muscat among others. Literature should not be hampered by censorship but it certainly needs more artistic as well as technical abilities than those exhibited by Mr Vella Gera. When referring to this writer I am not implying that what I wrote necessarily applies to all his writings. I had to add this before over-sensitive commentators barge in with their half-baked counter arguments. If there is something I hate is being considered as a supporter of conservative ideas and their propagators.
Kenneth Cassar
Mar 14th 2011, 18:31
@ Frans Sammut:
Fair enough. You and other followers of Porter Abbott have every right to that opinion, just as long as that opinion is not imposed on the rest of us. And I gather that you're against that kind of thing.
Frans Sammut
Mar 14th 2011, 19:25
Mr Cassar, you are absolutely right at least in one aspect, namely that I don't wish or intend to impose my opinion on anybody else. That is why I referred you to Porter Abbott. It would take too long to explain my view on this board and you can peruse Porter Abbott's explanation at your leisure. Allow me to repeat - for the last time - I had expressed my personal view on this case very early on its time-line. I did not concur with the idea of taking the writer and the editor to court. This notwithstanding I cannot agree with those who consider this piece of writing 'literary' which is a separate issue. You see, I am not easily carried away and dislike the Catch-22 situation created by hurried decisions, namely that to save the two persons involved from the clutches of the law, one has to forgo one's literary standards. To conclude: I am as happy as you are that the two persons involved were acquitted but still insist that they do not claim acquittal on grounds of literary value. They were acquitted in terms of freedom of expression.That is all.
Chris Frendo
Mar 14th 2011, 09:33
Freedom of speech and freedom of expression prevails!!
Charlie
Mar 14th 2011, 10:26
Awesome outcome the way forward