Advert

Granting Libyan pilots asylum ‘would send strong message’

Video: Alan Adami

Libyan campaigners have dismissed concerns by the Refugees Commissioner that a petition asking for the two Libyan pilots who defected to Malta to be granted asylum could jeopardise the safety of their families back home.

“I assure (Refugees Commissioner) Mario Friggieri the petitioners are painfully aware of the threat to not only the families of the pilots but to Libyans generally. By no means do we wish to endanger anyone but the suggestion that the Libyan authorities are somehow unaware of the identities of air force personnel who disobeyed orders and ran off with fighter jets is borderline absurd,” said Abdulla Darrat, an expatriate Libyan activist helping to run the pro-reform campaign Enough.

The claim only served as a justification for Malta’s inaction in the face of mounting injustices, he said.

The pilots defected to Malta in their jet fighters claiming they refused to follow orders to bomb civilians on February 21. Both airmen are seeking political asylum and their request is now before the Refugees Commissioner.

Mr Friggieri said last week the petitioners behind the campaign “are not considering the harm that can be done to their (the pilots’) families in Libya”.

Almost 35,000 people signed the petition promoted on www.change.org, which reads: “Refugees Commissioner Mario Guido Friggieri has not yet made clear whether the pilots will be granted asylum. If the pilots are sent back to Libya, they will likely be executed.”

Mr Friggieri would not even comment on whether the pilots had applied for asylum or not.

The campaigners are insisting the Libyan government knows full well the identity of the pilots and could exact revenge independently of any campaign. On the other hand, granting the pilots asylum and making it known would send a message to other pilots or soldiers considering defection.

“Recent aerial bombardments in the east of Libya suggest hesitancy among some pilots who seem to be purposefully missing targets.

The Maltese government has the power to offer hope to these Libyans, who, as things stand, have few options but to obey orders despite their better judgment,” Mr Darrat insisted.

Change.org’s director Weldon Kennedy stressed that the Maltese government had done a brave job protecting the identity of the two pilots and turning away a Libyan crew sent to retrieve the jets a week after they landed here.

“I sincerely hope they will continue this kind of leadership by listening to what Libyan grassroot activists are asking of them and grant asylum to the two pilots they are already protecting.”

Granting asylum to the two pilots would send a powerful message to other military people that if they defect there would be a safe haven for them, he insisted.

Advert

25 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

J Zerafa

Mar 11th 2011, 10:06

Same here! Two lives are at stake and here we are ....playing stratego! Le le insara ahna!

Alfred Bugeja

Mar 10th 2011, 13:39

What a load of rubbish, Mr Formosa.

Asylum procedures are decided according to the laws of our country, the Refugees Act to start with. That is the metre that the Refugee Commissioner uses to decide on applications. He's not supposed to heed to petitions or your muttering for that matter.

martin saliba

Mar 10th 2011, 13:28

RUBBISH ! Flying distance from triploi to malta is only about 2/3 that of from triploi to benghazi so even if an aircraft flys halfway to bengazi and back it would have more that enough feul to reach malta and popssibly mainland europe. It is very evident that you have no idea of the sheer size of libya.

Raymond Sammut

Mar 10th 2011, 15:21

@ martin saliba

The Libyan air force has not been bombing Benghazi in recent days. Furthest bombings from Tripoli have been over Ras Lanuf. And airfields used are not necessarily located in or near Tripoli. Like you say, Libya is a big place, with airfields located deep south away from the coastline. I do not recommend you become a military tactician. If I may suggest a different profession.

martin saliba

Mar 10th 2011, 17:17

Pity you weren't recriuted by the US military. You could have advised them on how to deal with afghanistan and iraq. Dare i say vietnam also.

martin saliba

Mar 10th 2011, 17:26

For your information Ras lanuf is 650 Km east of tripoli which makes it a round trip of 1300 Km.
http://www.libyaonline.com/business/details.php?id=13275

Raymond Sammut

Mar 10th 2011, 23:53

@ martin saliba

You only have information on Ras Lanuf. If you want to attack Ras Lanuf by aerial bombing, you will also need to know where your airfields are. Frankly, I haven't checked, but my guess is that the Libyan air force has airfields south of Ras Lanuf. If not, then you could be right.

martin saliba

Mar 10th 2011, 13:09

" Wise enough, their asylum for these pilots have to be given agreed ok, but NOT NOW. As it will invite others to follow them. This will be a very bad precedent " How ignorant and selfish of you. The main point of giving these brave pilots asylum is in the hope that others WOULD follow them.

John Micallef

Mar 10th 2011, 13:17

Hahaj, i tought someone will quote that!!!

It seems no one ever played poker in our diplomatic service!!

Tell me if you were a thir pilot will you do it after reading this, & guess what? your answer is yessssss!

Ray Gatt

Mar 11th 2011, 09:50

Mr. Micallef, I can't take you seriously as in your red eyes, anything this administration does is a disaster. You're not able to be just and say good when it's good and bad when it's bad. You are too extreme.

Advert
Advert