Advert

Air Malta: Government accuses Opposition of 'playing to the gallery'

The Opposition's approach to the Air Malta restructuring process was this evening criticised by the Finance Ministry.

It said in a statement that it was a shame that rather than submit concrete proposals to safeguard the airline, the opposition remained politically opportunistic and played for the gallery.

Labour leader Joseph Muscat said this afternoon that the party was very disappointed at the way the restructuring of Air Malta was being handled.

He said the business fundamentals of the plans were wrong and the whole process was raising doubts about where all this was leading.

The plan included wrong information and blatant shortcomings, he said.

It also also ignored important sectors such as the carriage of cargo and had basic mistakes even regarding the bottom line.

The government should have noticed such basic mistakes immediately, more so since the livelihood of many families was involved.

The disclaimer attached to the plan was longer than the plan itself, Dr Muscat said.

All this, he said, showed why the government had wanted the Opposition to sign a confidentiality agreement. It also explained why the government yesterday admitted that it had requested fundamental changes to the plan, drawn up by Ernst and Young.

The PL believed there was a future for Air Malta and wanted to give its total contribution, but was not being allowed to do so by the government, he said.

Air Malta, he said, needed to broaden its horizons to become stronger, but this did not appear to be the government's aim. He recalled that three years ago, the prime minister told the airline's workers that the airline had a good future. The situation was very different now.

He said the Opposition had agreed to participate in the restructuring committee and had been prepared for round the clock meetings, if necessary. It also backed emergency borrowing for the airline.

Much depended on the government's policies for Air Malta's survival, including a policy which allowed low cost airlines, but did not harm the national carrier.

The Opposition would stay on in the committee in the interest of the workers, but hoped the government would heed its call to help the airline and to get the restructuring process properly on track.

The PL would not reveal confidential information, but it did not need to be bound by confidentiality agreements, Dr Muscat said.

The Labour leader said the government had told the trade unions that they should give up the principle of 'last in, first out' or it would otherwise not provide alternative jobs. His view, Dr Muscat said, was that if the governemnt could give alternative jobs for those dismissed not under the last in, first out principle, it could give alternative jobs to everyone.

The ministry said that the Opposition’s sole interest was to undermine Air Malta’s restructuring process.

This could be seen from the its continuous negative comments and its insistence on casting doubts on the process, rather than make constructive proposals for the reforms.

It reiterated that Ernst and Young had been requested to make fundamental changes to their proposals and they were currently working on this. Therefore, it was amazing how at such a delicate moment, the Opposition leader continued to make comments which undermined the restructuring process.

In the same way, it was shameful how the Opposition leader was criticising the government for wanting to ensure confidentiality. This showed that Dr Muscat did not mind allowing the airline’s competitors to know of the airline’s final strategy.

The government appealed to everyone to respect the process to restructure the airline.

Should this fail, it warned, there would be negative consequences not just for the workers and their families but also for all who worked in the tourism sector.

Advert

53 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

j Mifsud

Mar 10th 2011, 16:36

Ezatt ilqattu l-musmar Joe!!! Kaz mitluf dan.

axuereb

Mar 9th 2011, 23:29

hielkom kwazi 25 sena tghaffgu fl-AirMalta...pero xorta bqajt tivvota PN! Allura bil-vot tieghek tajthom il-kunsens li 'jghaffgu' elezzjoni wara l-ohra.

ROBERT HENRY BUGEJA

Mar 10th 2011, 09:27

@C.Cassar...

Checking out your comment makes me think that you were living on another planet during the last 20 years. Are you for real? The Unions 'KILLED' the seamalta, the shipyards and now the airmalta, you say? One must be really insensitive, arrogant and insane to speak in this manner!...Go and ask the former workers of the seamalta, shipyards and airmalta and see how much they will agree with you and will clap their hands at your argument!! The Truth is that your beloved party is to blame for these INCOMPETANCES and financial disasters. It was your beloved party which slyly left these matters to occur in order to go to Plan B...and we all have an idea what Plan B means to the PN.

Joseph Calleja

Mar 9th 2011, 19:11

The Minister of Finance was the one overseeing the finances of Air Malta. That makes him responsible for the demise of Air Malta. If Air Malta was deteriorating for the last 8 or 10 years, where was the minister of Finance then and where is he now? Where is the accountability? Maybe as they say, sh.t runs downhill. Air Malta is on the brink of bankruptcy but nobody is willing to accept the responsibility. The Government, the incompetent management and the unions were all there sitting idly by on the sidelines when Air Malta needed help, now all of a sudden there is a sense of urgency and nobody. Where was the sense of urgency for the last 8 or 10 years? Since Air Malta is owned and run by the Government, then the Government has to take the blame and the Finance Minister who is in charge must be held responsible. It seems though that the employee is the only one answering for this fiasco.

Mike Magri

Mar 9th 2011, 17:15

@..AAzzoppardi... For your information and to clarify your childish assumption, i am a pensioner, thank God, and never been on Air Malta`s books.. BUT that does not mean that i do not give a hoot about the future of AIR MALTA..!! Ofcourse I Do, Azzopardi...!! Now as far as my `itellectuality` is concerned, i can assure you that thanks to my general experience in life, i am `intellectual` enough to easily see the government`s `tricky` intensions of the possibility of the making of Air Malta another PN club, like the Freeport..!! Because if the problem is the downsizing of the employees, then what is it that is so secret about the plan drawn up by Ernst & Young..!!??!!?? You see Azzopardi, the PN governments have much to blame in the bad investment decisions made thru the years, for Air Malta..

That`s Why We ALL Want To Know The Truth Before GonziPN Secretly Decides For Himself..

l fenech

Mar 9th 2011, 18:00

@Mike Magri.

You are so right. We are always on the blind side of what is happening on this island we only get to know after "affare fatto".

VCassar

Mar 10th 2011, 08:59

In the red gabha il-Gvern tieghek bic-Chairmen illi hatar u zburzjaw il-kumpanija; b'nies illi iktar kellhom l-interess personali taghhom u tan-negozji taghhom u li inqdew bl-AM biex ihaxxnu buthom..Sur Dimech. Il-PL wellidha lill-AM.

axuereb

Mar 9th 2011, 23:36

Jekk nigu f dan anke gonzi qed imerrihom ghax talab revizjoni. Jew qabzitlek dik il-bicca?

Satine Christian

Mar 9th 2011, 17:33

Hi there,

If you had any correct arguments going on up there, you ruined them all with your punch-line. I am 25 yrs old, so I suppose it is in my best interest that employers think I am more employable than other age groups; still, agism is NOT an attitude that should be resorted to, or propogated for that matter.

Kindly be the responsible adult that you are, and refrain from giving others the impression that you are shallow and rude, as this may be an incorrect jugdement, and worst of all, it may have an impact on other reader's attitudes.

Satine Christian

Mar 9th 2011, 17:47

Hi there,

Although it seems that you may have positive, strong arguments going on up there, the humble opinion of a morally conscious person is that you have ruined it all with your punch-line, and choice of words throughout your paragraph statement.

Coming from the under-30's generation, it is natural that I would enjoy reaping the fruits of emlpoyers who prefer working with people in my age group, as opposed to others, yet I know it wrong to propogate this idea, but that is what you have done. Agism is to nobody's advantage, in any area of life - it is disrespectful to all individuals, on which society is built.

Kindly realise that you have responsibilities being the adult you are, and that freedom of speech comes with responsibilities too. Not only did you come off as shallow and rude, but you forgot about how others' may be influenced, and that is negatively.

Thank-you.

c.muscat

Mar 10th 2011, 08:47

If i'm not mistaken the last in first out option is in the law and not a GWU collective agreement. Employment and Industrial Relations Act 452 Article 36(4).

c.muscat

Mar 10th 2011, 09:01

If I'm not mistaken 'last in first out' is according to the Employment and Industrial Relations Act CAP452 Article 36(4) and not something negotiated in a collective agreement. Can any lawyer confirm this?

Deo Catania

Mar 9th 2011, 16:08

Ellul, kieku minnek naqra l-ittra li baghat Gonzi fil-25 ta' Frar 2008 lill-haddiema tal-Airmalta, qabel taqra dik tikteb xejn.

alexia farrugia

Mar 9th 2011, 15:24

the problem is that the pn that created problems with airmalta want us to believe that they can solve them. labour is after saving malta's national carrier in the national interest.

Mark Galea

Mar 9th 2011, 13:47

x'behsiebu jaghmel Joseph Iceland Muscat? Jaghti l-pariri? Jew xi terremot?

Jason Micallef

Mar 9th 2011, 15:25

@ Mr.Galea. Prosit Sur Galea kemm taf iddahhak.

Anthony Buhagiar

Mar 9th 2011, 16:58

@ Jason Micallef - apparti c-cajt jiena dhaqt. Jekk tifhem il-battuta tidhaq. Nghiduha kif inhi, tidhaq flok tibki. PL, grow up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Advert
Advert