Advert

Pope exonerates Jews over death of Jesus

The Pope has made a sweeping exoneration of the Jewish people over the death of Jesus in a new book, tackling one of the most controversial issues in Christianity.

In excerpts from "Jesus of Nazareth" released today, the Pope uses a biblical and theological analysis to explain why it is not true that the Jewish people as a whole were responsible for Jesus' death.

Interpretations to the contrary have been used for centuries to justify the persecution of Jews.

While the Vatican has for five decades taught that Jews were not collectively responsible, Jewish scholars said today the argument laid out by the pontiff, who has had his share of mishaps with Jews, was significant and would help fight anti-Semitism.

"There's a natural human tendency to take things for granted, and very often this tends to lead to a lapse in awareness and consciousness" about the risk of anti-Semitism, said Rabbi David Rosen, head of inter-religious affairs at the American Jewish Committee and a leader in Vatican-Jewish dialogue.

He noted that the Vatican issued its most authoritative document on the issue in 1965, "Nostra Aetate," which revolutionised the Catholic Church's relations with Jews by saying Christ's death could not be attributed to Jews as a whole at the time or today.

Rabbi Rosen said the Pope's words might make a bigger, more lasting mark because the faithful tend to read Scripture and commentary more so than church documents, particularly old church documents.

"It may be an obvious thing for Jews to present texts with commentaries, but normally with church magisterium, they present a document," he said. "This is a pedagogical tool that he's providing, so people will be able to interpret the text in keeping with orthodox Vatican teaching."

The book is the second instalment to the pope's 2007 "Jesus of Nazareth," his first book as pope, which offered a very personal meditation on the early years of Christ's life and teachings. This second instalment, set to be released on March 10, concerns the second half of Christ's life, his death and resurrection.

Advert

6 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

D. A . Agius

Mar 3rd 2011, 16:32

It's time well spent if the critique is within a reasoning mind.

That's how things are improved. You study an issue and you do your criticism, for which again one may comment and criticise.

Just saying " oh shut up" and "Go to hell" shows that some people either have no brains to counter the criticism or that the critique is an unwelcome feedback that is uncomfortable to the opposing side.

If you don't like seeing people's comments, you're a bit too down in the page. Simply don't visit it. You'd simply be another Ostrich with the head tucked into the sand, like many other before you, now and in the future unfortunately.

probably the greatest gift of communication is the possibility of promoting constructive argumentation and thought, not stifling it!

Michael Mercieca

Mar 3rd 2011, 07:21

Interesting... Let's analyse this shall we?
If it weren't for the Jews' insistence for Christ's crucifixion, the Romans wouldn't have bothered crucifying an enemy loving hippy... so the Romans are to blame for actually crucifying Christ but the Jews were the ones who brought the events!

Joe Borg

Mar 3rd 2011, 07:42

just wait until he finds out that roman soldiers used to rape all the women that came under our hands, casting serious doubts on the pidgeon story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Advert
Advert