Muscat appreciates govt consultation in Libya crisis
Crisis shows Air Malta is also asset for security reasons
Opposition leader Joseph Muscat this morning expressed his appreciation for the way how the Opposition was being kept constantly informed and consulted by the government over the Libyan crisis.
In a radio phone-in, Dr Muscat also expressed his appreciation for the work being done by Air Malta. This crisis, he said, showed how Air Malta was a strategic national asset not only from the commercial point of view to support tourism, but also from a security point of view.
“What would have happened if we did not have Air Malta? We do not have large military aircraft, so who would have picked up the Maltese workers from Libya if the government did not have control over Air Malta?” he asked.
Dr Muscat in his statement said the Opposition was being cautious in what it said and did because the situation was delicate and people’s lives and wellbeing could be at stake.
One had to consider the national interest, not only now, but also for the future, when the situation calmed down and Maltese workers returned to Libya.
However, he said, Labour unreservedly condemned all violence in Libya, and it insisted that human rights were, by definition, rights which had to be respected.
The Labour leader said that from the point of view of Malta’s neutrality, the UN Security Council decision to impose focused sanctions against Libya was an important decision which Malta, as a UN member, was bound to follow.
The Opposition, Dr Muscat said, had no problem in Malta being used for humanitarian reasons in the current crisis.
Dr Muscat thanked all Air Malta personnel for their service in Libya, pointing out how airline crews had left the safety of their aircraft to seek out Maltese passengers amid the chaos of Tripoli airport.
One did not see purely commercial or low cost airlines doing this sort of thing, he said.
This crisis, he said, had shown once more how right Dom Mintoff was at the Helsinki CSCE conference in the early 1970s to insist that European security was linked to security in the Mediterranean.
It showed how the EU needed to rethink and place stronger focus on its Mediterranean policy.
This, Dr Muscat said, was a wake up call of how the Mediterranean was a sensitive region and how Malta’s Mediterranean vocation was not cosmetic but something which needed to be taken seriously in the national interest.
“This crisis should give Malta impetus for serious dialogue between the peoples of the Mediterranean,” Dr Muscat said.
He said the Opposition was backing the government with regard to pressure which needed to be placed, and preparations which needed to be made, should an exodus of migrants from Libya materialise. One should not alarm anyone, but one should be prepared.
Malta needed to observe its humanitarian obligations, but also safeguard its national interest. Malta was showing solidarity with other nations in this time of crisis, but Europe needs to do likewise with Malta should the need arise.
“In the same way as we are helping others, we expect that others help us if a migration crisis develops,” Dr Muscat said.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
john borg
Feb 27th 2011, 18:44
I am surprised he's no longer saying we should wage a massive advertising campaign to get tourists here!
Peter Xuereb
Feb 27th 2011, 17:44
This is the political situation we want to see in Malta: cooperation not competition.
George Vella
Feb 27th 2011, 15:58
Well said Hon. Dr. Muscat. This is a very positive sign that Malta can come together in time of crisis. Keep it up Malta and show the world that you are united.
E Mifsud
Feb 27th 2011, 11:40
Very appropriate, mature words and action in the national interest from Dr Muscat. It is best to be very careful what Malta as a country says, in view of the many Maltese workers who earn a living in Libya and the appreciable investment Maltese businesses have there. No one can predict what will happen and so it is wise to be prudent.
anthony pace gouder
Feb 27th 2011, 10:48
Hag'ohra li konna ikkritikajna u hafna 'esperti' kienu qiesuha INUTLI u hela ta' flus , li taht Gvern ta' Duminku Mintoff kienet progett infrasstrutturali ewlieni illum rajna kemm ir-RUNWAY, tul ta' zewg mili, kienet U HIJA utili .
L-ajruport taghna seta b'hekk jilqgha fih l-akbar ajruplani kemm civil u militari waqt il-Krizi Libjana, u b'hekk Malta qieghda sservi tant tajjeb bhala CENTRU t'evakwazzjoni fejn ELUF ta'Haddiema minn kull rokna tad-Dinja, kemm Amerikani ,Ewropej u Asjatici setaw isibu Kenn u Serhan.
Joseph Vassallo
Feb 27th 2011, 10:37
Quoting Joseph Muscat: "We do not have large military aircraft, so who would have picked up the Maltese workers from Libya if the government did not have control over Air Malta?”
This opens a potentially valid argument for the continued fiscal support of Air Malta when government argues its subsidy case with the EU. There is no better argument than an actual precedent, especially given that with its limitations, Air Malta does not constitute a threat to bigger national airlines.
What do others think?
I Abela
Feb 27th 2011, 11:59
Agreed 100%
A. Hollander
Feb 27th 2011, 10:09
This gave me an idea for a solution of the problem that Malta is going to have in that the EU will not allow to subsidize AirMalta in future. Since Malta does not have military transport planes, the army should pay a "retainer" to AirMalta for the use of their planes as military transport planes and also enlist some of their pilots part time in the airwing so they can be used as military pilots on these plane.
George Borg
Feb 27th 2011, 10:01
Faced with a crisis like the one we have on our doorstep, the statement by the Opposition falls greatly short of expectation. We do not need to be the lone champions of the Mediterranean-that political concept has long become dehydrated. We really need to face ourselves and our national interests and ask if neutrality serves us well and reassures our security concern. Neutrality seems to be serving others interests more than ours. We should seriously consider NATO. We have very little to rely on in an hour of need.
Manuel Micallef
Feb 27th 2011, 10:59
I disagree with Malta joining NATO; We always had a vocation of peace and neutrality.
What Malta could do though, is beef up a notch its OWN armed forces - possibly through some help from the EU.
We need better equipment so that we don't need UK and US to take over everytime soemthing happens - or at least we minimise the reliance on others.