Advert

Libya requests return of Mirage fighters

The Libyan government has formally requested the return of two Mirage F1 fighter jets flown to Malta by defecting pilots on Monday.

The aircraft are under armed guard at the airport. The pilots have requested political asylum and their case is being considered. The pilots claimed they flew to Malta after being ordered to bomb fellow Libyans in Benghazi.

A Foreign Ministry spokesman said there has been no contact with the Libyan government on the fighter aircraft.

AIRPORT IS HIVE OF ACTIVITY

Meanwhile, Malta International Airport remains a hive of activity, with many countries using it as a transit point for the evacuation of their nationals.

Informed sources said that 41 flights have been operated to Malta from Tripoli since Monday, while Air Malta has operated 10 flights from the Libyan capital, including two today. All Maltese who were at Tripoli airport were picked up.

Advert

111 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Dion Borg

Feb 25th 2011, 19:17

@Cecil Herbert Jones..The Prime Minister's decision??..first of all there are International Rules that in this case since Libya has not been declared as a war zone,the jets are still theirs,secondly once the MIA gets paid all the bills,landing and use of airport's apron,refuelling etc..they decide to release the planes.I think you forgot that our own Airport was sold to an Austrian Firm (MIA)..and by the way,who wants to be in GONZI's shoes??..not even himself..!!

Anthony Farrugia

Feb 25th 2011, 10:54

Good idea; dismantle them into parts and crate them. The Chinese did something similar to a US plane some years ago.

N. S Tanti

Feb 25th 2011, 09:54

Agree. Also, they have landed before obtaining permission therefore making it illegal I guess.

Joe Grima Brussels

Feb 25th 2011, 10:04

I agree with your comment, although I believe that we should do BETTER than that. They should, YES be used as an insurance to the safety to all Maltese nationals. BUT, and a big BUT, we SHOULD hand them back AFTER the one who ordered them to fire on his people is no more in power. Preferably, Malta should seek assurance that the new Libyan government will not use them for crimes against humanity. If Malta sends them bck right now, while Gaddafi is still (?) in some sort of power, AND HE SENDS THEM TO BOMB INNOCENT CIVILIENS, Malta will be an accomplice in crimes against humanity.
Edgar Borg. Yes, it was Libyan people who paid for them, so they belong to them. But they were sent to KILL Libyan people! 'The most christian thing to do' is to save human lives with one of the limited options we have: keeping them away from possible attacks on civilians.

T Mifsud

Feb 25th 2011, 09:48

I agree, but I prefer handing them over to the UN and Libya deals with them.

Corinne Vella

Feb 25th 2011, 09:41

There is no case for bombarding people discriminately.

Joe Spiteri

Feb 25th 2011, 08:15

That's right what you said about the bible.....but please, God also said, don't kill and if those jet are returned to that tyrant in Lybia they will be used to kill and to murder innocent victims whom they want is something that you don't even dream of it....freedom....as you are living in it. So please DON'T GIVE THEM THESE WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRUCTION.

T Mifsud

Feb 25th 2011, 08:19

Sarcastic!

Jos Borg

Feb 25th 2011, 08:33

You are either joking and being sarcastic or else pro Gaddafi or worse still interpreting the bible the way the devil does.

Personally I would paint them in Maltese colours - finders keepers.

f vincenti

Feb 25th 2011, 08:45

@Edgar
I don't think doing the 'christian' thing is appropriate in this case... send them back so they can be used to bomb and shoot ''innocents'' again? Nope.

R. Azzopardi

Feb 25th 2011, 08:45

Please tell me that you're joking!

Anthony Farrugia

Feb 25th 2011, 08:52

What a hypocritical post ! These type of aircraft are right now being used to shed the blood of Libyan citizens!

Christian Sciberras

Feb 25th 2011, 08:58

What??

And what about "divine providence"?

Roger Tanti

Feb 25th 2011, 09:06

Is this a joke or what?

Bernard Mifsud

Feb 25th 2011, 09:09

Well said they have paid enough with their money ... there is no need to pay with their lives. Giving the planes back is definitely wrong however I will not risk my nation.
I am sure that they have enough planes to come and pick them up themselves and if we are not careful they might also leave us a souvenir.

Dr Francis Saliba

Feb 25th 2011, 09:11

There is nothing Christian at all about returning those Mirage fighters NOW in the full knowledge that they are to be used for the slaughter of civilians by their unhinged leader.

isabelle luca borg

Feb 25th 2011, 09:19

even if you know that 99% they will be used to KILL?!?!?!?

J.Grech

Feb 25th 2011, 09:30

Are you serious? Plz tell me you're kidding, "After all its the people of Libya who paid for them".....do you really beleive so?!?

Corinne Vella

Feb 25th 2011, 09:38

If you are going to bring Christianity into a pragmatic issue, then apply it correctly. Those planes are here because they were meant to fire on Libya's people.

Michael Vella

Feb 25th 2011, 12:01

@ Edgar Borg

So according to you and your weird interpretation of the bible, we should give these aircraft back to a tyrant, to be used to slaughter his own people? What does the bible say about killing defenseless people? What does the bible say about washing your hands of a problem and passing the problem back to the people? What does your own conscience say about giving these planes back to Libya? Also, just in case you forgot dear Edgar, we did not take these planes, they were flown to Malta by Air Force pilots that REFUSED TO BOMB THEIR OWN PEOPLE!

Now go to mass on Sunday clutching your bible and pray for the suffering of the people of Libya, but whilst doing so, remember that if it were for the flawed reasoning of people like yourself, their suffering would have been much greater!

Christian Sciberras

Feb 25th 2011, 10:07

That's exactly why the is bogus and the Maltese shouldn't fall for it.

T Mifsud

Feb 25th 2011, 08:18

... and one of the Mirages was bailed out from and crashed outside Benghazi when the pilot refused to bomb oil installations there. So does that make 9 remaining serviceable Mirages?

acassar

Feb 25th 2011, 09:33

Mela skond int Mr Grech ghandhom minn ta l-inqas 50 sena ohra biex dawn l-ajruplani jergghu jmorru lura ghand sidhom !

j cassar

Feb 25th 2011, 08:56

short, sweet and very true J Fava

C Falzon

Feb 25th 2011, 15:43

"and if we don't send them back, I guess the Libyans won't appreciate that much... "

Sure, the Libyans will hate us for denying them the opportunity to be bombed by these planes.

Pauline Abela

Feb 25th 2011, 09:00

Well said. Time to 'soddu!'

Evarist Saliba

Feb 24th 2011, 21:35

I do no tknow who is saying that Libya will attack Malta. I think that Ghadadfi has enough trouble on his hands in Libya. No, I do not think that Ghadadfi will attack Malta. But you are naive to think that the US, or any other country for that matter, will immediately jump to our defence.
At the same time, a desperate man like the Ghaddafi we saw on TV earlier this week, will not hesitate to hit at Malta if he feels that this would serve his purpose. I shall not enter into any details. I have lived through similar but less bloody situations in Libya and other Arab countries.

Lieutenant Carson Attard

Feb 24th 2011, 21:41

Unfortunately you are wrong. The United states Government is of course monitoring the situation but the United states Navy is definitely not physically involved in the situation yet.

Christian Ellul

Feb 24th 2011, 21:41

Who convinced you that Malta is protected? Malta isn't even given help on immigration do you think the US (an ally according to you) will come to our service? The EU is not even capable of get its citizens out of Libya, so i merely think they'd be able to 'save us'!

Alan Cordina

Feb 24th 2011, 21:54

At long last !!!! a Good comment !!!!

Yanov Cutajar

Feb 24th 2011, 22:24

If thats so, then how come these very same Mirage fighter jets not only entered our territory, but landed in our airport then?

M.Micallef

Feb 24th 2011, 21:33

Agreed !

wally vella-zarb

Feb 24th 2011, 23:42

Not necessarily a contradiction: The Libyan Government (possibly through its legal representative, the Ambassador) has made a formal request to the Maltese Government for the return of its property. So far, The Maltese Government, according to the spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has not made an official reply. Where is he contradiction, assuming that the reportage is accurate?

The ball is now at our feet. Until such time as the legal government in Libya is overthrown or we break diplomatic relations with them - which seems unlikely at this stage - the Maltese Government cannot but return the aircraft. Doing so now, while there is still a legal Libyan government in place, will not break protocol and would be legally correct and defensible. Not doing so would be interpreted as taking sides against a legal government and in favour of those seeking to overthrow it who may or may not be successful in their enterprise. I would say that any delay that exceeds forty-eight hours would be too much of a gamble on our part.

Evarist Saliba

Feb 25th 2011, 11:04

@ W.V.Z. NO, there IS a contradiction. If the Libyan government has asked for the return of the aircraft, irrespective of the way in which this was done, then there has been contact with the Libyan government, even if we have not yet reacted to the request. This is not the time for playing with words to hide the truth. I, as a Maltese citizen, a voter who helped to bring the present administration into power, a former head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Malta's representative in Libya both during the times of King Idris and Col. Ghaddafi, would strongly condemn the Ministry of Foreign Affairs if it were to resort to such tactics. I would be the last to propose any foolhary actio, but the first to demand that we face our international obligations
with courage and conviction.

Dr Stephen Staines

Feb 25th 2011, 21:30

I quite agree with Wally Vella Zarb on this issue. Since we still have diplomatic relations, and since there is still a legal government of sorts in place(however morally reprehensible), what the strictly legal issue boils down to is who owns the planes. Even if the planes are misused, I don't think anyone can convincingly later argue that we have been accomplices in crimes against humanity.There is no nexus. I may be wrong but that is the way I see it.

Erin Ciantar

Feb 24th 2011, 23:32

And who exactly do you think we should negotiate this with? Ghaddafi, who is at the end of his reign of terror or the very people that are going to be bombed by him with the returned jets? Think your thoughts through next time.

J.Barnes

Feb 24th 2011, 22:12

Nice one!!!

J. Pace

Feb 24th 2011, 21:12

Tahseb li dawn iz-zewg ajruplani biss ghandu? Ma ghandux x'jambihom fil-verita, jekk mhux behsiebu jifqa x'imkien!

J. Grima

Feb 24th 2011, 22:00

Actually. half their air force is an intelligent estimate considering the fact that Libya have a total of 12 Mirages, 2 of them being here. But they can't realistically attack us considering we have several warships for various countries floating around. Hell, their airforce is still probably too busy bombing their own people.

I suggest diplomatically delaying until Gaddafi is overthrown. Then we'll talk to the new democratic government (provided of course the Muslim Brotherhood doesn't take over!).

E Galea

Feb 24th 2011, 22:36

If they were to attack, rest assured the the 6th fleet would be more then happy to put her birds on the hunt!!!!!

Cecil Herbert Jones

Feb 25th 2011, 11:27

I second that.

david calleja

Feb 25th 2011, 00:58

@ T Mifsud
'' We need the 6th fleet near us ASAP''... I see, so after 30+ years of telling anyone who cared to listen that we are ''neutral'' - after numerous hysterical outbursts from everyone every time anyone mentioned any military collaboration anywhere (partnership for peace comes to mind) - after being so very proud of being neutral - with part of the country almost suffering a collective heart attack every time a '' WARSHIP''... enters the empty grandharbour .... NOW we want the 6th fleet near us... why don't we drop a line to the Captain of the Cumberland while we're at it... only now the message will be...
hey.. we're frightened, there are nasty armed aggressors in the vicinity ... please send your sons and daughters to protect us and die for us if necessary.... errrrmm i'm sure we'd do the same for you....
yeah right... what out and out cheek....viva Malta...

Advert
Advert