Advert

Many roads to a divorce decision

The weekend blitz on divorce may have left people scratching their heads over precisely how the country will go about deciding on the matter.

On Saturday, the Nationalist Party executive approved a motion outlining a roadmap that would have seen the divorce debate start in Parliament and proceed to a referendum only if the majority of MPs voted for the proposed Bill.

Barely had the ink set when on Valentine’s Day the Labour Party parliamentary group unanimously approved a resolution that would see a referendum on the Bill being held before the debate in Parliament kicks off.

The Times looked at the two options in an attempt to find out what they mean.

PN option:

This option means MPs could have the final say on divorce without people ever being consulted on the matter in a referendum. If, however, the proposed referendum clause is inserted in the Bill it would create a double hurdle for the introduction of divorce since people would only be consulted if MPs vote “yes”.

• Divorce Bill starts to be discussed in Parliament.

• MPs can shoot down the Bill during the first reading if a division is called and each MP would have to declare his or her vote. During the first reading the contents of a Bill are not discussed and the House is simply asked to give its go-ahead for the Bill to be published.

• If the Bill gains a majority in the first reading it proceeds to the second reading. A discussion on the general aims of the Bill is held in the plenary. After the debate MPs vote on the Bill. A no majority means the Bill is shot down but a yes majority means the Bill moves to committee stage where each article is discussed and voted upon.

• At committee stage the government side would propose the inclusion of a clause which stipulates that the law, if approved by Parliament, would only come into force if the people say “yes” in a referendum. If the clause is not approved, a referendum would not be held and divorce may become legal through a parliamentary vote.

• The Bill then makes it to the third and final reading. If MPs shoot it down, no referendum is held. If MPs vote in favour of divorce and the referendum clause is approved, the Bill will only become law if people vote yes in a referendum.

• If the referendum delivers a no vote the divorce Bill is shelved. If people vote “yes”, the President would have to sign the Bill making divorce legal.

PL option:

This option gives people the chance to express their position on the divorce Bill in Parliament through a referendum before MPs start to discuss the issue. However, given that the referendum is not binding, MPs may ignore the result and vote differently from the majority outcome.

• A consultative referendum is held asking people whether they agree with the salient points of the divorce Bill currently before Parliament.

• A “no” vote would stop the Bill in its tracks unless its proponents insist it still be debated in Parliament.

• A “yes” vote in the referendum would lead to a parliamentary discussion of the Bill.

• The parliamentary process, as outlined in the first option, follows through but at each stage where MPs are called to vote they may take note of the referendum result and vote according to the majority outcome or else ignore the referendum and vote according to conscience. MPs who have a personal position that is not consonant with the majority outcome may also choose to absent themselves from Parliament.

• If Parliament votes for divorce the Bill would become law after the President signs it.

Advert

12 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

j gatt

Feb 16th 2011, 10:49

Some have eyes but cannot see.
Some have sences and must not feel.
Yet others have ears but will not listen.

Question is where do these folks come from? Where do they all belong?

Not Borg in Nadur, that place was last inhabited during the good old Bronze Age.
Besides it is a historical site and should not be trampled but preserved.

j gatt

Feb 16th 2011, 10:40

All of Europe is Evil then, unfortunately Catholic Malta is heading that way.
Question is, should we vote on exiting the Union, so Malta`s marital problems will simply go away?

Nicholas Coppini

Feb 16th 2011, 11:46

Dear Mr Swanson, What a silly comment. A woman who is beaten black and blue and needs a way out to save her skin and possibly rebuild a life is evil according to you. Her kids who are craving for some peace and quiet and hoping their daddy will not one day beat mummy to death are also evil. A man who is mentally abused by his spouse and treated badly is also evil according to you; him wishing to get out of the misery in which he is living is an evil wish according to you. Oh dear Mr Swanson; I say God is merciful, God is loving. Let God decide who and what is evil and who and what is not. I hope you will never find yourself in a predicament where you desperately need to leave. In the meantime I will pray to God to enlighten you and to make you more compassionate.

J Borg

Feb 16th 2011, 16:40

The ONLY evil pro-divorce activists admit is that of the 'other' partner. Obviously, NOT ONE of them ever admits that HE/SHE might be the problem. ALL those who write about violence, unfithfulness, cheating,....write from the 'side' of the victim. Is it possible that NOT ONE of them is in the wrong? I wonder!

Joe Grima Brussels

Feb 16th 2011, 18:56

Mr Coppini. 'Let God decide who and what is evil.' WHAT A SILLY (to put it mildly!) comment! God HAS decided what is evil, and DIVORCE IS! And He does NOT need your approval to do that! He told you this in the Bible, but obviously you have no time for that! You didn't read all the comments yesterday, as some GAVE YOU THIS REALITY, giving you a selection FROM THE BIBLE! And stop claiming that ALL those who want divorce are beaten blue. You're forgetting that the ONE WHO BEATS SOMEONE BLUE, ALSO wants divorce, with YOUR blessing. And God help us if we make divorce AUTOMATIC for those who are severely beaten. If we do, some villains will realise that if they beat their partners hard enough, they get their divorce. YOU WILL BE CONDEMNING FUTURE SPOUSES TO BE BEATEN BLUE, SINCE THIS WILL ENSURE THEIR PARTNER HIS/HER DIVORCE. AGAIN, this will be with YOUR BLESSING! God IS merciful, but not crazy!

j gatt

Feb 16th 2011, 23:13

@Joe Grima
With all due respect sir , can you get divorced in Brussels?

P. Borg

Feb 17th 2011, 07:44

Evil min hu egoist u jirraguna li la tajjeb jien tajjeb kulhadd. Dak zgur evil. U sincerament nghidlek WHO CARES mill-grave sin li dan Joe Zammit tal-medjuevu irrid jirrikattana bih. As if it make any difference. Kollox grave sin basta jsir li trid il-knisja. Mela qed tahsbu li ghad hawn in-nies tas-60s jibilghu kull ma tghidulhom.

Advert
Advert