Ministers should have seen Air Malta disaster coming – Labour
Labour Party leader Joseph Muscat said yesterday that the Prime Minister had deceived Air Malta workers through letters sent to them on the eve of the 2008 election telling them their jobs were safe. He also referred to an e-mail sent to a worried worker at the telecoms company Go in which Dr Gonzi gave assurances there would be no redundancies, even after the company had been privatised. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi
Both the present minister responsible for Air Malta and his predecessor should have seen the trouble coming, Labour leader Joseph Muscat charged yesterday.
Given that the airline always had a minister responsible for it, both Finance Minister Tonio Fenech, who had Air Malta added to his portfolio in February 2010, and his predecessor, Austin Gatt, should have realised what was happening, he said.
The carrier posted a loss of €31 million in 2009 and last December the government was forced to seek EU permission to grant the airline a €52 million loan so it could keep flying, anticipating bigger losses for 2010.
However, the full extent of the airline’s problems emerged last Friday with news it would need to shed about half of its 1,200 employees to become sustainable.
Dr Muscat insisted yesterday the steering committee overseeing the carrier’s restructuring, which the Labour Party had agreed to join, was not even given an indication of this scale of job cuts, insisting committee members should not find out such things from the newspapers.
The Prime Minister had deceived airline workers through letters sent to them on the eve of the 2008 election telling them their jobs were safe, Dr Muscat added.
He referred to an e-mail sent to a worried worker at the telecoms company Go in which the Prime Minister also gave assurances there would be no redundancies, even after the company had been privatised.
“Now the company has announced it plans redundancies,” Dr Muscat said, referring to an announcement by the company last week.
He insisted the Prime Minister should explain these consistent broken promises.
The Finance Ministry accused Dr Muscat of political expediency in his criticism, saying that, having voted in favour of the loan Air Malta will be taking, he should have realised that things at the airline needed to change. “It is, therefore, baffling how at the same time he is insisting the airline should keep everything as it is,” the ministry said.
6 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Calleja
Feb 14th 2011, 15:47
Here we go again, Air Malta, the Divorce initiative, Cohabitation,the Power Station, City Gate ,the Opera House, and do not forget the Honoraria Pay Raise and many more. Politics at it's best. Party leaders and MPs pointing fingers and jumping on band wagons to suit their political needs. Let us concentrate on one problem at a time and that is Air Malta. Air Malta has been going down the drain since 2003 and nobody took responsibility, namely the Ministers, and incompetent management in charge. On the other hand both parties knew about the demise of Air Malta and now both parties are trying to capitalize on that too. Maybe bringing in a new outside CEO is not such a bad idea after all. The problem remains that the same MPs that saw and controlled Air Malta for the last 7 or 8 years are still the same MPs over seeing the transformation. Since this PM and his MPs were were running the show during the destruction of Air Malta, they should be held accountable for the downfall. Putting the fox in charge of the chickens is not very smart. How convenient to take it out on the employees.
JFarrugia
Feb 14th 2011, 14:10
Bernice
Feb 14th 2011, 12:58
and who will pay the consequences...the minister or the employees? Guess we know who is truly liable in this country! The innocent!
Ramon Casha
Feb 14th 2011, 11:14
Everyone knew this situation was coming. One of the big problems with many parastatal companies and government departments is that politicians of all colours "reward" their loyal supporters with jobs, sometimes high-level managerial posts. Since these are the darlings of some MP or even minister, they can't be sacked even when it turns out that they can't count without using their fingers. Then, when such companies get privatised, the government always hammers out an agreement that the current employees will be retained, or else transferred to some other company/department. Of course many of the employees do a good job, but when the company has to shed workers, who are the most willing to leave? It will be the good workers because they have a good reputation and will find another job easily. Those who are only there to warm up their seats will hang to their jobs like limpets because they know they've been a liability since day 1, and nobody will want to employ them.
Bernard Storace
Feb 14th 2011, 09:23
Action speaks louder than words Mr. Muscat....and where was the PL during this period? Why did the PL not point out that something, somewhere could be wrong. Criticism without constructive advice is worthless. And, yes, if the PM promissed and assured jobs that was naive of him because circumstances change drastically, as we have seen, and moreover, in this ever changing scenario the work front is like a roller coaster and the employee has to move with the tide, keep abreast of technology and grab opportunities as they present themselves. NO, the work force is not to blame (up to a certain extent) for what has happened, management does and the buck has to stop somewhere. In the meantime drastic measures have to be taken to save our airline; after all our National Airline is very, very important to our country's needs, a fact that is recognised by many.
r ferriggi
Feb 14th 2011, 08:58
ministers have not seen the Airmalta disaster coming,,,,,,ONLY,,,but more!!!
airmalta is a gvernment owned and controlled entity.
therefore,,,, it is obvious that there is responsibility. what baffles the mind is that when an employee in a workplace maks a mistake,,, he or she is sanctioned or punished.
when an administration is part-perpetrator of such an event where a national airline company collapses when it has moently been profitable...... nothing happens.
this is ''institutionalised' mafia that governments practice. the end loser is only one - the public.