Fort St Elmo may include tourist accommodation in development review
Mepa has launched a six-six week public consultation following a review it carried out on the draft development brief for the rehabilitation of Fort St Elmo and its environs.
The reviewed development brief takes into account the new government policy initiatives for the urban regeneration of Valletta and will serve as a proposed framework for future rehabilitation plans.
The development brief is proposing that the fort may be restored and rehabilitated as a major tourist and local visitor venue, and could incorporate a number of cultural attractions and visitor facilities, as well as tourism accommodation, catering facilities with panoramic views, and office space.
The brief also acknowledges that the upgrading of the surrounding public spaces is of paramount importance and would be beneficial in terms of the employment creation and revenue generation in the area, Mepa said.
The reviewed development brief sets out the various parameters and environmentally compatible strategies that aim to utilise the potential of the area without compromising its unique historical value. The draft brief also considers various aspects of the rehabilitation process within the context of the Grand Harbour area including historic conservation and design issues, transportation, services and infrastructure.
The area covered by the development brief area has an approximate footprint of 9.25 ha. and includes the original Fort and the later additions at the Carafa esplanade, the extended outworks along the bastions, the ditch and granaries in front of the Fort, the Evans building, the Examination Centre and the foreshore.
At present, a large part of the site and its residential neighbourhood is in a state of neglect, with few locals and tourists venturing towards this lower end of Valletta, mainly due to a lack of tourism and commercial attractions. The aim of the exercise is to extend the cultural and tourism activities that are currently being encouraged through the regeneration projects in the upper and middle part of Valletta, to the lower end of Valletta.
The draft brief acknowledges that the fort, that dates back to the mid-16th century, has considerable potential to attract tourists and local visitors. Incorporation of a number of cultural attractions, visitor facilities coupled with tourism accommodation, catering facilities with panoramic views as well as office space is therefore contemplated.
The rehabilitation project of the fort proposes the restoration and re-use of the existing structures as a museum and related facilities such as souvenir shops, restaurants and tea rooms. The possibility of locating an audio-visual facility within the barracks is also indicated. The piazza, on the other hand, would be ideal for outdoor activities in summer. Upgrading of public spaces is earmarked to be given paramount importance.
Other recommendations in the draft brief include:
- The reconstruction of the old lighthouse on the Cavalier, that may serve as a viewing platform for visitors and a landmark beacon within the Grand Harbour and Marsamxett region;
- The restoration of the chapel near the ‘Porta del Soccorso’ and St. Anne’s Church;
- The restoration and rehabilitation of the imposing three storey Pinto stores with later British additions, for commercial uses including tourist accommodation, food and beverage outlets, retail outlets, office accommodation and educational purposes;
- The development of a Heritage Route along the outer bastions with appropriate paving and landscaping commencing from the site of ‘The Malta Experience’ building all along the outerworks of the Fort and the Carafa bastions behind the Pinto magazines and terminating near the Drill Hall, the current location of the War Museum;
- The possibility of expanding the War Museum, using existing historic structures along the Enceinte which are to be duly restored for this purpose or other cultural uses;
- The reinstatement of the Knights’ botanical gardens in the landfront ditch which serviced the medical school of the Order within the framework of a comprehensive landscaping scheme. This area may be made accessible to the public;
- The detailed architectural studies that should lead to a decision on the retention or otherwise of the Evans Building and the potential for underground car parking on the site. The brief also recommends the exploration of the reuse of Evans Building as a residential, office and/or tourist accommodation complex.
- The use of the Granaries in front of the Fort (that are currently underutilised) as an alternative entrance to the Fort (in addition to Porta del Soccorso from the Carafa Enciente), thereby providing visitors a full appreciation of the land front fortifications;
- The pedestrianisation of certain areas such as part of the main road leading to Triq il-Mediterran.
The project as a whole is envisaged to be a catalyst for employment creation and revenue generation in the area, Mepa said.
During this second phase of public consultation, the Authority is encouraging interested parties and the public to view these revisions and submit any comments and feedback. Submissions are to be sent to the Authority by not later than 21st March 2011, to: Director of Planning, Fort St. Elmo and Environs Development Brief, Malta Environment and Planning Authority (MEPA) P.O. Box 200, Marsa, MRS 1000
Or on the email address: fortstelmo@mepa.org.mt
The revisions and Brief can be viewed on the MEPA website www.mepa.org.mt/public-consultation.
20 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
anthony pace gouder
Feb 9th 2011, 10:55
Its a great relief that this REVISED development brief has cancelled plans that the Hon.Minister Dr. A Gatt had announced A YEAR AGO ,which proposed :-
1) The re-routing of the existing road by the Graneries to run through the FORT'S DITCH .(?)
2) A Cruise Passenger Terminal and ancillary berthing Quays for Liners on the Marsamxett side.
3) Convert Evan's Building into a Hotel.
Jimmy Magro
Feb 8th 2011, 19:42
What MEPA is doing in these second and third thoughts on the existing development briefs is changeing them to the whimps of the Government. There is a government controlled company being run from within a government ministry that dictates policy and barks at all institutions to have their way. The direction is to make the investment on st.elmo to relaise a profit and hence now they have come with the big idea to offer accomodation, which means a hotel. St. elmo = hotel, Evans building = hotel. Valletta being turned into more hotels.
The authorities never gave any space to the initiative I took to set up a Foundation to offer space for those that want to give their time to cultural innovation. Why should all the property be run by two organisations in Malta? Is there not room to have a new Foundation?
I think it all depends on colour. This a scam. Public consultation is people talk, government decides.
Do not waste our time plse. We all know how to have a break.
Douglas Bagnall
Feb 8th 2011, 18:16
Please get on with it, can hardly wait, Malta has lots of history but we are hungry to see more of your hidden treasures.
Mr & Mrs Bagnall
England
victor pulis
Feb 8th 2011, 15:04
The plans to turn St. Elmo into a cultural center (and not I hope a hotel) are to be commended but what about its big brother across the water? Fort St. Angelo is still crying out for restoration. yesterday we learned from a news item on TV that Heritage Malta is draggng its feet and has not applied for EU funds to fund the much needed repairs and plans have fallen behind. all that has been done so far is restoring of the bell cote and repairing of the roof on a small room on the cavallier. Parts of the fort are in danger of collapsing if nothing is done. This is our heritage and we have a right to know what's going on. can no one be trusted with the safe keeping of these jewels?
Mark Bonavia
Feb 8th 2011, 14:33
U allura nghid jiena vera dan ghadu draft ta development review,imma dawn ir-rapporti u studji kollha jekk m'hemmx flus biex nghatu zieda xierqa lill haddiema jew ghallinqas rohs fit tariffi tas servizzi, Il-flus ghall dawn il-progetti min fejn ha jigu? ghax lanqas jekk tissussidjana l UE xorta parti mis somma irridu nohorguha ahna.U qabel nghamlu dan kollu irridu nsibu post alternattiv ghall akkademja tal-puluzija u d-dilettanti tal karnival. Ghall sant iermu ghandu flus gonzi ghall Carnival Village le ?
Rupert Cefai
Feb 8th 2011, 14:04
And how about a contemporary arts museum? We're probably the only country in Europe that still does not have one.
C. Farrugia
Feb 8th 2011, 13:11
This would have been the perfect place for Paliament, instead of ruining one of the few open spaces available in Valletta. This would have hit two birds with one stone. Rehabilitated Fort St Elmo and found what to do with it.
D. A . Agius
Feb 8th 2011, 13:38
Yes, couldn't be more right!
A place where they could have stayed hidden away, and if ever Maltese decide to have another uprising against the rape of Malta by its politicians (both colours), they can lock themselves in.
On a more serious note, at the stage we are, as long as private interests do not mean a "Keep Out" notice every other corner, any use of the site is good.
Too many years simply talking and taking no action. That's what has led to the situation where historic fortifications / sites are abondoned, such as in St. Angelo.
Unless we want another Pompei accident happening in Malta, Politicians should get their sleeves rolled up and get a moving. I mean Politicians so that it is not a Government only proposition, but a joint effort by both sides of the house and the local community. No use spoliing the milk (or appear to be) and then spend countless hours discussing what went wrong (if anything).
Guzeppi u Wenzu, ahdmu jew il-voti zgur ma jigux!
r ferriggi
Feb 8th 2011, 12:47
to zahra:
my mistake; i HAVE in fact been once before and the place fascinated me. may i point out that parts of it were closed to the public.
am i correct in saying that there are people who are in favor of St Elmo becoming a tourist hotel??
( yes,,, a hotel.... ma noqghodux induru mal lewza... biex xi hadd privat jaghmel kapital min post publiku u storiku).
Kenneth Williams
Feb 8th 2011, 13:40
sewwa qieghed tghid.imissu jekk ser jghaddih lil privat bil flus li jaqla minnu l gvern jibni l carnival village...jekk mhux ser jghatih b xejn ukoll
Wayne Hewitt
Feb 8th 2011, 12:14
About time. This project needs to be done in private public partnership to avoid the government excess capital outlay. I deem this project of urgent importance and the deadline for completion should be set in line with the City Gate project.
Someone needs to finally bite the bullet and get this area of Valletta over and done with.
Someone is finally acting. Hopefully we will have a bustling Valletta 24 hours a day, emanating a sense of affluence, business and employment as a capital city of such hostory deserves in the 21st century.
r ferriggi
Feb 8th 2011, 12:04
correction of my note:
i meant '' for tourist accomodation'' and not for ' tourism''.
i agree it is opened up for touist like all the other historical places,,, but not as a hotel,,, or offices...
MG Vella
Feb 8th 2011, 11:32
This is where our money should go, not in frivolous vote catching projects, like construction of tunnels and airstrips
Joseph MIfsud
Feb 8th 2011, 13:46
If a tunnel does not serve you, it does to us Gozitans! We had enough of wasting our time to travel to and back from Malta.
Joe Spiteri
Feb 8th 2011, 14:15
Joseph MIfsud so do others who have to travel from one end of the island to another. What would have you done if you had to drive your car to a train station, take a train for an hour or more and then take more time to get to work and repeat the whole thing all over again going back home?
If you want the pie-in-the-sky as somebody had called it and I call it an election gimmick, then pay for it yourself or get a job in Gozo because we cannot keep paying taxes to be wasted on such white elephants.
C. Borg
Feb 8th 2011, 17:50
Joseph Mifsud, if you think that if ever there is a tunnel to Gozo, than crossing is going to be much faster, than think again. There are going to be for sure, endless queues waiting to go in the tunnel and at the paying booths (i dont think it will be for free). As Mr. Spiteri said, getting anywhere in Malta takes an hour or so, so better get used to it.
That is until ''BEAM ME UP SCOTTY'' become reality.
r ferriggi
Feb 8th 2011, 11:31
ah ok.
ive never had he opportunity to visit this historical placewhere i have read so much about in history books.
and now,,, it is going to be prostituted for tourism?!?!
are there no bounds to greed of certain indivuduals??
may i add also the disgrace of the block of exclusive apartments near the 3 cities fortifications.
these things leave the history, environment and culture lovng people of these islands dumbfounded.
A. Zahra
Feb 8th 2011, 12:32
How can you comment. You who have never visited the site in your life and as soon as a suggestion on its use is made, you are the first to object.
Stephen Mangion
Feb 8th 2011, 13:08
Totally agree with Mr.ferriggi
SCassar
Feb 8th 2011, 13:14
So what do you suggest instead of a hotel?
Look at fort manoel, restored by the private and will make use of it and keep the fort in good shape!
And dont forget that this is just a brief not the actual plan .. a brief is just to give the options which the fort can be used for!