Muscat hints PL will not take divorce position
Joseph Muscat indicated today that the Labour Party would not take a formal position on divorce.
He said in reply to questions at a PL conference that he personally had a clear mandate about divorce. Prior to his election as party leader, he had explained his personal position in favour of the introduction of divorce and had also said that he would grant Labour MPs a free vote in Parliament.
At the time, he said, he had not expected divorce to come up in this legislature. Malta was now in this position because of lack of leadership by the prime minister.
However, the goings on within the Nationalist Party did not change his own consistent and well known position.
Should a referendum be held, the only change would be that it would be the people who would have a free vote. All Labourites, therefore, would be free to vote as they wished according to their conscience.
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said last month that the Nationalist Party would take a position on divorce after discussion within its structures. A political party, Dr Gonzi said, should assume responsibility for its decisions and take a position on matters of principle, without, however, imposing anything on anyone.
Former PN leader Eddie Fenech Adami told The Sunday Times today that the PN should formally adopt a position against the introduction of divorce.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
'No need for early election if PM's...
In Discussion
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Gozo tunnel could take 5-7 years to...
CABS remote controlled aircraft shot...
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Joseph Calleja condemns portrayal of...
Updated: Labour would give...
CABS drone shot down
Second group of migrants arrives
Adrian Vassallo in scathing...
73 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Zammit
Feb 10th 2011, 09:24
Divorce is the dissolution of a validly contracted marriage by a human person. It is always a grave sin. Christ himself has pointed this out to us: “What God has joined together let no man put asunder” (Mk 10.9). The Catholic Church in her Catechism speaks clearly about the evil of divorce and says that “it is a grave offence against the natural law” (Par.2384). So Christ and his Church put our minds at rest about the intrinsic immorality of divorce.
This leads to the question of voting for divorce. Morally speaking, voting in itself is an indifferent act. It becomes good or evil according to the object of voting. Voting for something good is morally good, voting for something evil is morally evil. Besides, abstaining from voting against an evil when an evil is at stake is equally evil.
In our case we have no divorce legislation. So, can one vote for divorce without sinning seriously against God? The answer is definitely “no”, because if divorce is intrinsically evil, voting for evil is also intrinsically evil. Abstaining wilfully from voting against divorce is also evil. It is a grave sin of omission.
Marriage + Divorce = Cohabitation
Karl Abela
Jan 31st 2011, 11:20
Ovvjament!!! ...it would be unwise for lejber to take a stand for fear of losing popularity from its very own camp.
D.Galea
Feb 1st 2011, 09:33
The is the good part Mr.Abela, from what I am reading Labour is about keeping the vote an individual decision while the PN is leaning more to draw everyone to make a stand like a herd of sheeple.
axuereb
Jan 31st 2011, 08:51
All Labourites, therefore, would be free to vote as they wished according to their conscience.
Well done Dr Muscat, that is how things should be. Everyone should be free to make their own choice without the political parties / church interfering.
Joe E Galea
Jan 31st 2011, 08:37
Well done JM!!
The divorce issue should not be politicised and as a true democratic leader you are right not to impose your well known opinion on others. This is a people's issue, therefore people should be free, though should be well informed, to vote as they deem right.
And for those slamming JM for not forcing his party to adopt a formal decision, please get real and admit that your party is makign a big mistake by doing so. If the PN takes a formal position it will condition many hardcore Nationalists to be in conflict with themselves. A free vote would be based on everyone's free will.
E. Pavia
Jan 30th 2011, 23:36
This whole issue is becoming non-sense! Why the political parties and anti-divorce campaign into this. Just introduce divorce with certain measures not to be abused and those who believe in it make use of it adequetly while those who do not believe in it just let others live thier lives. How can someone tell a person not to divorce after a failed marraige??? Who is he/she to intrude in their private lives? For those who mix religion with divorce should think otherwise as this is a civil right and leave religion out of this! As always the 'religious' ones are trying to impress and again are doing more harm to their beliefs and religion. Religion is not for the public eye for those who believe! So think before any conclusions are made.
Mark Piscopo
Jan 30th 2011, 20:08
Well done Dr Muscat to this wise decision! Labour Party must not take a formal position on divorce!
Joseph H Borg
Jan 30th 2011, 19:57
If this is a Progressive Party, I'm Houdini and live in a jar....keep it up Joey, you're attracting so many with this attitude!!
C.Busuttil
Jan 30th 2011, 19:48
Well done Dr. Muscat, as Nationalist I admire your stand.
As a party, labour could have taken a position in favour of divorce and although I am against divorce I would not have objected. After all labour has always been progressive. However you have kept in mind that your supporters are catholics and it would be unfair on them to impose your will. Labour supporters have taken the burnt once for going against their religious believes when the church unjustly stood against them.
The PN on the other hand is bound by its ideals to be against divorce not matter what blackmails by JPO.
josephine fenech
Jan 30th 2011, 19:40
cannot understand Gonzi's stand about divorce when he said that it was not in his electorial programm.
He should think twice because he imposed so many burdens that he never said in his gonzipn electorial progamm.
Mike Magri
Jan 30th 2011, 19:03
What Dr. Joseph Muscat said, in my opnion, IS the Most Sensible way of how best we should tackle this divorce issue. Meaning that at the moment let us NOT involve the political parties in parlament by having to declair their position on this case now, (as it was not on their last election electoral manifests), but instead give their members of parlament and supporters, (after a general healthy and civilized debate), a Free Vote according to everybody`s concience.. So let us just have a CLEAR People`s Choice first through a referendum, and then, if the result would be in the affermative, then both parties SHOULD bind themselves to either start preparing the relevant law this year or endorse such a result in their Electoral Manifest for after the coming general elections...
Bernard Storace
Jan 30th 2011, 17:47
The subject 'DIVORCE' has become a boring one and whatever anyone says, one day it'll have to be introduced for the simple reason that we profess to be a democratic country. Whether one calls it divorce, separation or annulment the end consequence remains the same with the exception of an annulment which is sanctioned by the holy church. Offspring will always suffer; the risk of one of the parties injuring the other is increased the longer a couple remain under the same roof and whether it's a divorce or a legal seperation co- habitation will follow in a number of instances. So let's demand and await a serious debate on the subject where the political parties throw away their colours and "unite" under a Maltese banner for an honest, no holds barred discussion. And one more thing, I honestly believe that the party in power at the time should make the final decision as legislator.
Joe Zammit
Jan 30th 2011, 16:40
Remarriage after divorce can easily be described as another form of cohabitation. In cohabitation there is no bond. Divorce points to no bond because when they want the couple can for some reason or another get a divorce. Divorce opens the way to literally another form of cohabitation.
Marriage and only marriage is serious and beneficial to every human society. The two characteristics of marriage are UNITY and INDISSOLUBILITY. Marriage is for ever.
No voter, no MP can vote in favour of divorce without sinning seriously against God. Divorce is a grave sin and voting for divorce is equally a grave sin that separates the offender from God and puts them on the path to hell.
Christian Sciberras
Jan 30th 2011, 16:08
For once I applaud Muscat's decision.
To those saying he's a weak politician; a political party, especially in opposition, simply can't pick a side invariably.
Politicians need ideas not sheep/followers (that's for the population..).
Joe Micallef
Jan 30th 2011, 15:51
Ehmmmm on what has Muscat and the PL taken a position?????? Boq! Ah yes at least on two things 1) against EU membership and 2) against joining the Euro zone
Roderick Spiteri
Jan 30th 2011, 15:21
Illum Joseph Muscat wera li ghandu vizjoni cara ghal dan il-Pajjiz specjalment ghalina tas-south. Bl-intoroduzzjoni ta' kelliem ewlieni fl-izvilupp sostenibbli ghas-south ta Malta u l-hatra ta Silvio Parnis bhala kelliem ewlieni, ghal-ewwel darba ir-regjun taghna ha jkollu persuna li kapaci tifhem il-problemi tas-south ta' Malta u naghtu vizjoni lil dan il-pajjiz.
Igri jasal il-waqt li Joseph Muscat ikun il-Mexxej ta dan il-pajjiz....
Wilfred Camilleri
Jan 30th 2011, 15:15
Is this a party that never takes a stand on anything? Is this the party that just criticizes other parties' stands but never come up with one of their own? Have some guts and for once come up with a stand or a policy that the electorate can evaluate you on.
D. Camilleri
Jan 30th 2011, 14:19
This man's decision proofs wise in view that this issue was not part of the PN electoral mandate. Considering the fact that Muscat was consistent from day one Dr.Gonzi on the other hand is playing around with our civil rights.
joe schembri
Jan 30th 2011, 14:16
a very wise decision by pl well done
Anthea Gatt
Jan 30th 2011, 14:12
Well well well, seems like common sense is ruling....Even JPO now urged PN not to take a position. This is the way forward!
m. borg(slm)
Jan 30th 2011, 14:05
Looks like the gonziPNers apologist on this article don't even know that gonzi has himself said thatgonziPN would not take a stand.
Hypocrites.
Adrian Mizzi
Jan 30th 2011, 13:47
Signs of a very weak leader - at least he could have met with his team to discuss the issue and share the feedback just like Alternativa and PN do. I doubt he will be able to take decisive action when difficult national decisions face him as a future prime minister.
Muscat Pat
Jan 30th 2011, 13:46
I welcome both Mgs Anton Gouder's and Joseph Muscat's position on the issue. They both want to let the people decide on divorce without any pressure and with all the serenity that such an issue entails. Thanks God we have come of age; let the people decide.
F.Salerno
Jan 30th 2011, 13:40
Jien nazzjonalist favur l-introduzzjoni tad-divorzju,pero l-PL huwa partit bla sinsla jekk ma jiehux pozizzjoni.
Phil Humphries
Jan 30th 2011, 13:39
Dr Gonzi said, ( A Political Party ) 'should assume responsibility for its decisions and take a position on matters of principle, without, however, imposing anything on anyone.' I don't remember him expressing these beliefs and principles when he IMPOSED his unwanted Parliament Building on the nation. I wonder if he will hold true to his principles and assume responsibility when the PN hands power to Labour ?
Chris Frendo
Jan 30th 2011, 13:36
What a joke this guy is!
G Borg
Jan 30th 2011, 13:16
STILL sitting on the fence! In spite of the 'earthquake'. Is there AYTHING that PL ever had a clear decision on???? Normally they're always AGAINST anything PN suggests: NO to EU, Local Councils, Euro (but yes to devaluation of Maltese Lira!), computers, vat (but yes to CET!), etc etc... In all of these, MLP/PL was against, until they saw where the votes were, and then made their 'wise' decision. Sitting on the fence has its own advantages: You wait and see where you can get most votes from, THEN you show your position! As easy as that. We are used to old/new Labour!! Nothing changed, in spite of the promised 'earthquake'!
Ethelbert Schembri
Jan 30th 2011, 13:16
Well this is only natural after Dr Muscat said that he will tell the PL MPs to have a free vote so it would be an inconsistency if the PL took a formal position !! Well done Dr Muscat and the PL for this mature position !!
Andrew Vella
Jan 30th 2011, 13:14
Decizjoni tajba! Issue bhal din m'ghandix tithol politika fiha, u jiehdu pozzizjoni fuqha l-partiti. Din ghanda tkun ghazla tal-poplu, kif jahsiba hu. Sfortunatament jekk il-partiti jiehdu pozizzjoni, hemm certu persuni li ghalkemm ma jaqblux mal-partit li jzommu mieghu, jivvutaw bhal ma jahsiba l-partit, biex tkun "rebha" ta dak il-partit. Proset lill-PL u lil Dr Muscat!
Lawrence Cassar
Jan 30th 2011, 12:53
Good thinking Joseph! That's what we need. Leave partisan politics out of this one!
Anthony Farrugia
Jan 30th 2011, 12:50
As always on the fence!
Frans Sammut
Jan 30th 2011, 12:50
The fact that it's a smart decision does not diminish its correctness. Divorce should not be a partisan political issue. Be it discussed in Parliament or at the polls, it remains a matter of conscience and should be tackled that way. Who said that smartness and correctness must be separated? On the contrary, when they coincide and become, so to speak, co-extensive they are bound to colour a fruitful exercise and lead to beneficial results. Dr Muscat is evidently showing remarkable maturity which his opponents were not, perhaps, expecting from him. There's much more to him than they were anticipating. Good. Very good.
Paul Galea
Jan 30th 2011, 12:48
So now divorce is not a human right ? Only moral or immoral !
C Muscat
Jan 30th 2011, 12:43
Good Show and most sensible. The PN is trying to divert attention and trying to find another EU issue. The PN is trying to make us forget the direct taxes being imposed all the time ... the most infamous Water and Electricity, gas, petrol, diesel and sacrosant price of bread. And most of all diverting the issue of where are going all our moneys...which is why we are paying an extra 600 per week per member.
Alfred Tanti
Jan 30th 2011, 12:43
Mela l-PM lill-Membri Parlamentari se jhallihom jivvutaw kif iridu (ghallinqas hekk qal), u mbaghad lin-nies se jgieghelhom jivvutaw skont il-pozizzjoni tieghu! X'logika hi? Ghadhom lanqas indunaw kemm hu wise Joseph Muscat!!
A Camilleri
Jan 30th 2011, 12:39
Who's the one not taking a position?!! It was the PM who washed his hands in declaring that he will hold a referendum on this issue!! This should have never been left for a referendum. But the PN cabinet is so split up that it can't decide!
James De Giorgio
Jan 30th 2011, 12:30
My God, for once Muscat is right...
I quote: "At the time, he said, he had not expected divorce to come up in this legislature. Malta was now in this position because of lack of leadership by the prime minister."
The government has no mandate on divorce in this legislature. Which is why many Nationalist voters (the Catholic core) WILL feel betrayed were divorce to be introduced in this legislature.
I hope JPO pays dearly in the next election for his holding the government hostage due to its one-MP majority in the house.
m. borg(slm)
Jan 30th 2011, 14:02
For your information JM has been more right than you'd care to admit since you wear blinds like a horse. Also JM has made it clear that Divorce won't be an electoral issue but it would be suggested as a private members bill. As regards JPO introducing this said bill you are gravenly mistaken that there is any blackmail on his part, it was simply a ruse to draw peoples' attention from other more important issue like the high increase in cost of living, the attrocious and criminal increases in electricity and water bills due to incompetence, the infamous BWSC contract, Valletta gate, gonziPN infighting etc. Except that the plan back fired and caused more damage than good to the party. That what happens when you use dirty politics and ones agenda is simply the ways and means to hold onto power and the goodies that come with such power. If you remeber well the out going general secretary Mr Salib had declared without anything to hide that he was not happy with JPO and if it was him he would have resigned, because of the Mistragate. gonzi laid the bed now he has to sleep in it .
Anthony Mizzi
Jan 31st 2011, 08:02
Yes Joseph Muscat is right again, consistent and making his position known without any mumblingor lawyer jargon ....as usual -
-----------------------------
Malta was now in this position because of lack of leadership by the prime minister.
However, the goings on within the Nationalist Party did not change his own consistent and well known position.
D Agius
Jan 30th 2011, 12:29
Let's leave partisan politics out of this one. It's such a delicate issue which needs a free and informed decision from the citizens. That's why I agree that political parties should not lead opposing campaigns. They would do better if they refrain from taking a formal position, but rather informing on how we can minimize the risks.
Jesmond Abela
Jan 30th 2011, 12:28
How come!!!!!! qatt hadu xi pozizzjoni dawn in-nies.
josephine fenech
Jan 30th 2011, 19:45
Fuq min qed titkellem. Fuq il PN zgur
ASpiteri
Jan 30th 2011, 12:19
what a weak politician he is!
he is being granted a golden opportunity to inflict a heavy permanent damage on the PN on this issue, yet he's turning this occasion into another reminder of what Labour is all about…a weak and futile opposition!
All he needs to do is…
Oppose the idea of a referendum on the basis that divorce is a right that shall not be threatened by a majority and include the introduction of Divorce in the next election’s Manifesto.
by doing so, he will get PN votes who are in favour of divorce, exactly in the same way the PN managed to get PL votes who were for EU membership!
however, Dr Muscat, as any other politician in Malta, is another product of the Church institution (he’s a st aloysius student) and although he wants to be portrayed as mr progressive, his upbringing will always have the upper hand on his political decisions!
Manuel Micallef
Jan 30th 2011, 12:37
@ ASpiteri Nahseb li qed titlef il-punt. Joseph Muscat ta' free vote lil nies tieghu biex jideciedu fuq il-kuxjenza taghhom, u huwa qal l'opinjoni tieghu personali b'mod car. Dik hija pozizjoni minna innifisa.... Joseph Muscat irried lil Poplu jideciedi kif jahsb huwa u mhux kif il-partit jghidlu - fuq kustjoni li hija personali, ta' opinjoni personali u ta' kuxjenza. Personalment, naqbel 100% ma Joseph u nistenna lil Goniz jkollu l'kuragg jaghmel l'istess... pero' miskien ma jistghax ghax irrikatat minn niesu!
John Mifsud
Jan 30th 2011, 14:15
An ex St Aloysious student or not he has declared himself against divorce, I cannot see why he should cause trouble among the Maltese just to show how strong he is. That was Eddie Fenech Adami's style and look where it got us in the 80s.
Joe E Galea
Jan 31st 2011, 08:39
What a stupid argument you brought up!!
Oh my God, I realise why this island is ruled by incompetents when having nonsense people to vote them over and over again.
Daniel Falzon
Jan 30th 2011, 12:15
Very wise decision as this is not a political issue. Everyone has to be free to vote according to his own conscience.
Charles Borg
Jan 30th 2011, 12:14
Thank God that the PL doesn't have an ex leader imposing his ideas on the party. Seems like Eddie Fenech Adami has the Mintoff 96-98 syndrome!!
Joe Zammit
Jan 30th 2011, 12:13
The great majority of PL members and supporters are Catholics and against divorce. Divorce is to the detriment of all people. Only unreasonable persons wish for divorce because they see up to the tip of their nose.
Marriage + Divorce = Cohabitation
Joseph Borg
Jan 30th 2011, 13:07
u btw .....kif int daqshekk inteligenti li iddecidejt li ghax jiena naqbel mad divorzju jiena nara sal ponta ta mniehri! Just for the info. jiena ragel mizzewweg u kuntent bil hajja mizewwga tieghi u anqas tghaddili min mohhi li xi darba niehu id-divorzju pero IVA naqbel li kull individwu ghandu jiddeciedi ghalieh hu u mhux haddiehor. Jekk il poplu jrid hekk isir hekk...dan il balla biki u btw....nahseb ma tantx kont tajjeb fil maths ghax iktar nahse li Marriage - divorce = cohabitation milli Marriage + divorce....l answer kellu jkun Marriage +divorce = a new opportunity to start a new life.
Peter Spiteri
Jan 30th 2011, 13:31
Joe Zammit did you ask them and all the rest of the Maltese citizens Joe?
John Mifsud
Jan 30th 2011, 14:03
CORRECTION Separation without Divorce = cohabitation. Since if a person is married and not divorced there is no way he/she can remarry. We already have a large number of cohabitating couples even though we don't have divorce. We also have single persons cohabitating maybe because they are afraid of "till death us do part" bit.
E Phillips
Jan 30th 2011, 20:12
And the big problem with cohabitation is what exactly?
axuereb
Jan 31st 2011, 09:05
The great majority of PL members and supporters are Catholics and against divorce. What are you on about? Did you forget how the church treated Labour supporters in the 60s? You cant have been talking to a lot of PL supporters because you will realise that they are in favour of divorce in their majority!
David Gauci
Jan 30th 2011, 12:10
G. Catania, what's a smart decision, that's a no decision at all.Image in three years time Muscat will be Prime Minister, he will have to take challenging decisions on daily basis and he has to calculate how the outcome of these decisions effect us all.I hope that he is not another Alfred Sant in the making.From what I read today about Gozo bridges and tunnels, getting tourism from turmoil in North Africa,I am closer to prove my point.
M Bellizi
Jan 30th 2011, 12:04
I totally agree that parties should not take any stand with regards to the Divorce issue, since:
1) Divorce is not a political issue, it is rather a moral issue.
2) There is a mixture of people from both sides of the political spectrum which agree or not agree with divorce.
3) People will be more free to take a decision.
4) Example: If I am a labourite, why should I have been "obliged" to vote against EU cause of my party's stand.....and vice versa. (although EU issue have meen a political matter)
5) I do not want in the coming future to be bombarded by arguments (for and against divorce) by any of the political parties.
Anton Farrugia
Jan 30th 2011, 12:03
Ejja halli ma ndumux niddiskutu dil-kwistjoni u naqsmu l-poplu nofs favur u nofs kontra! Ejja ha nharsu lejn il-problemi vera tal-pajjiz!
h.Mizzi
Jan 30th 2011, 12:03
for those who disagree with Muscat they would do a good thing to read today's sunday times editorial
Oscar Cassar
Jan 30th 2011, 11:56
Ipokrezija... darba is-suggett ha l-importanza fuq skala nazzjonali qabel mal-PL poggieh ghad-diskussjoni hu fil-Parlement... mela din (skond Dr Muscat) hija 'lack of leadership by the Prime Minister' ghalkemm fil-verita aktar hija 'Opportunizmu Politiku' biex tider sabieh ma kulhadd. Kieku Dr Muscat ghandu verament ghal qalbu dawk il-vitmi tac-cirkustanzi li verament ghandhom bzonn support morali f'din il-kusjoni, jitkellem kontra l-fatt li dan is-suggett jkompli jsir loghba ghall-poter u l-vitmi uzati ckond Ic-cirkustanzi tal-gurnata.
Kieku vera Dr Muscat kien moralment konvint minn certu griehi socjali, kien bhala leader politiku jincentiva diskussjoni fic-crieki fejn ghandu nfluenza u mhux ipingi din id-diskussjoni ghad-dhul tad-Divorzju qisu xi problema tal-PN BISS. Minn u vitma fis-socjeta ma ghandux jinghata kulur politiku u kull politiku serju huwa fid-dmir li jekk nistghu, illum qabel ghada nassistu l-vitmi jekk verament irridu naghnu u konvinti mil-fragilita taghhom minflok naghmlu dan biss meta nkunu certi li hemm l-attenzjoni massima tal-media fuqna.
F'dan il-kaz Dr Muscat bhal xi nies ohra, qijad ukoll jinqeda minn dan is-suggett ghal skopijiet personali u partigjani li jmorru olter mill-htiega tas-socjeta u l-aktar nies vulnerabli.
r spiteri
Jan 30th 2011, 11:55
fuq is-shubija ta' Malta fl-UE qal LE....fuq l-ewro qal LE....fuq l-impjant ta' riciklagg qal LE....u fuq id-divorzju ma jridx jiehu posizzjoni......ghatx ghal kull vot possibli
D. Micallef
Jan 30th 2011, 11:54
Muscat has been consistent with his position. Gonzi is cornered unable to take a decision. Joseph Muscat has a clear vision, is setting the agenda and gonzi trying to catch up. In a matter of months he will be Prime Minister and this country will get the breathe of fresh air it needs.
j busuttil
Jan 30th 2011, 11:54
As always the PL does not bring foward proposals. Because the PL is afraid of taking a decession on divorce the party position is as we say in Maltese " BANDIRA BAJDA" biex jogob lil kullhadd. Il.PL mhux partit serju.
Robert Callus
Jan 30th 2011, 11:51
Wash your hands, like a true progressive! The best thing the PN has is the weakness of the opposition.
http://ralphcassar.wordpress.com/2011/01/30/labour-is-scared-of-divorce/
Sandro Agius
Jan 30th 2011, 11:46
Good decision.
How can the PM give a free vote to the MPs, but then tell PN supporters to vote against divorce? So, is it a free vote to the few, but an imposition on the many?
Karl Consiglio
Jan 30th 2011, 11:41
Lets put it this way, PL won't take a formal position on anything, precisely why you can't trust them.
Even to join Bondi's Xirka Rock, Muscat got all paranoid.
All the PL know how to do is attack the government without a plan of their own. What scares me is that it just might work again.
Emanuel Farrugia
Jan 30th 2011, 12:49
Meta l-Volpi ma setghax jilhaq l-gheneb, beda jghid li huwa qares. Inti taf xi tfisser meta wiehed ikun tal-glekk fl-art ? In this case, and on the specific subject of DIVORCE, the PL dont need to attack the Government because the PN is doing it for them ? Keep remembering it was JPO who moved the Bill.
C.Camilleri
Jan 30th 2011, 14:06
You are wrong my friend. The PL position is clear for all to see. The party will give a free vote to its mp's if the vote is taken in parliament and a free vote to its supporters in case of a referendum. It' you are not able to decide on your own and want your party to decide for you then so be it. But please for once let us leave partisan politics out this important decision that needs to be taken.
G Catania
Jan 30th 2011, 11:38
Smart decision. Lets not make this a political ball, just like EU membership.
Raymond Camilleri
Jan 30th 2011, 11:59
lol very smart!
what are parties there for then? The Labour NON-Party.... chickens!
John Mifsud
Jan 30th 2011, 13:52
@ Raymond Camilleri don't speak too soon, I bet PN will be saying the same thing, otherwise all those who vote against divorce will be voting against PN, which would not be fair since I know staunch PN supporters who are in favour of divorce.
J Fenech
Jan 30th 2011, 14:00
I think the biggest chicken is Gonzi for going down the referendum route. Since when does the majority decide on something that a minority would benefit from? That's why we don't do a referendum on single mother benefits, uemoplyement benefts and last but not least why we didn't do a referendum on whether members of parlament should have a pay increase. Hat's off to JPO, at least he had the guts to make a change.
Joe E Galea
Jan 31st 2011, 08:42
@Raymond Camilleri: So are you proposing a dictatorial style of leadership? I don't blame you since you are very happy with a disctatorship style of government masked behind a false democracy. I think people like you and others in here do much better not to post anything. Please stop showing how ignorant you are.
axuereb
Jan 31st 2011, 09:12
@ R Camilleri:
God gave you a brain, use it!