Greenland sheds record amount of melted snow and ice in 2010
Temperatures in the Arctic region have risen at two to three times the global average over the last 40 years.
Greenland’s icesheet, feared as a major driver of rising sea levels, shed a record amount of melted snow and ice in 2010, according to scientists, a day after the UN said last year was the warmest on record.
The 2010 runoff was more than twice the average annual loss in Greenland over the previous three decades, surpassing a record set in 2007, said the study, published in the US-based journal Environmental Research Letters.
Ice melt has now topped this benchmark every year since 1996, according to the paper, derived from long-term satellite and observational data. Were it to melt entirely, Greenland’s icesheet would drive up ocean levels by some seven metres, drowning coastal cities around the world.
No credible projections today include a doomsday scenario for the coming centuries. But recent research, including the new study, suggest that Greenland will contribute more to rising seas than predicted only a few years ago.
“The process is far from being linear, and it is not possible to simply draw a line” into the future, said lead researcher Marco Tedesco, who heads the Cryosphere Processes Laboratory at the City College of New York. But over the last 30 years “there has been an increase in runoff,” he said in an e-mail exchange.
Researchers have thrown up different figures for how much, and how fast, Greenland is shedding its icy mantle, which is up to three kilometres thick in places. They concur, though, that climate change is largely to blame: Temperatures in the Arctic region have risen at two to three times the global average over the last 40 years.
Based on computer models, Dr Tedesco estimated that runoff in 2010 was 530 gigatonnes, or billions of tonnes, compared to an average of 274 gigatonnes for the period 1958-2009, and 285 gigatonnes for 1979-2009.
In Greenland, summer temperatures in 2010 were 3ºC above average.“The capital, Nuuk, had the warmest spring and summer since records began in 1873,” Dr Tedesco noted.Globally, the year was also the warmest ever recorded, as was the decade it brought to a close, the UN’s World Meteorological Organisation said.
The new study focused on surface melt, runoff and the number of days when bare ice, free of snow, is exposed to the sun’s radiative force.
In 2010, “melting in some areas stretched up to 50 days longer than average,” added Dr Tedesco. The study also showed that land area where melting has been observed has been increasing at a rate of about 17,000 km² per year.
Not only do melting snow and ice flow directly into the sea, they also form torrential under-ice streams that lubricate the passage of glaciers toward the ocean. In assessing the icesheet’s total mass loss, melt is only part of the picture, Dr Tedesco said. “Our calculations do not account for losses due to calving” – the splitting of large chunks of glacier ice into the sea – “and ice dynamics, which are as big if not bigger than those due to surface melting,” he said. Current estimates of the Greenland icesheets net mass loss vary between 130 and 250 gigatonnes per year. Antarctica is the world’s biggest source of land ice after Greenland, but – with the exception of West Antarctica – is considered more resistant to any doomsday collapse.
By century’s end, Greenland could contribute as much as 50 cm to average worldwide sea levels, many experts agree today.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
C Borg
Jan 25th 2011, 14:40
30,000 scientists are suing the guy that marketed MAN MADE global warming as a true phenomenon. He has been given a Nobel peace prize, created useless laws and have changed all our lives; carbon taxes, fuel/gas price increases, AND has steered the real environmental challenge (forest deforestation, species eradication etc) to a pointless one which invades all our lives.
Please see this: and there is a wealth of information out there proving this is all untrue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ&feature=related
Karl Attard
Jan 28th 2011, 17:02
The usual nonsensical comments every article regarding climate change seems to attract on ToM. C Borg and others- stop this- you are embarrassing yourselves (which I'm not bothered about) and confusing the general public (which I am bothered about). The 30,000 scientists you mention are not suing anyone, and furthermore only 8000 of them can be called true scientists in this context- as they have a PhD- and even that doesn't guarantee that they are active researchers, furthermore 'leading' climate researchers. The 'man that marketed AGW' you refer to is the tens of thousands of scientific publications by leading university departments over the decades that increased our knowledge to the extent it is today- a knowledge that indicates it is impossible to pump billions of tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere without consequence. Furthermore deforestation and species extinctions and others are all intimately linked with climatic fluctuations. And by the way- nowhere in the article does AGW get mentioned. So really, what's your point?