Six ODZ properties denied right to sanction
The owners of six illegal properties in outside development zones have been prohibited from applying for a permit to legalise their development since the planning authority’s rules came into force on January 1.
The law prohibits the submission of planning applications which seek to regularise illegal development carried out in ODZ, scheduled property and protected areas after May 2008.
The law is part of the Malta Environment and Planning Authority’s mission to clamp down on illegal development. On top of this, the authority had published two draft legal notices for public consultation to introduce daily fines and penalties. The notices, which will remain open until February 11, seek to overhaul Mepa’s penalty system and substantially increase the fines.
During a media briefing yesterday, Mepa officials also highlighted the work to schedule properties of particular value carried out during the last year.
Since 1994, Mepa has scheduled some 1,846 heritage buildings. The process to protect such sites takes place behind closed doors but the information is then made public, which means it can be appealed.
Some 14 properties were scheduled in 2010, including Dar il-Kastellan in Żejtun.
The wreck of an X-lighter ship, built around 1915, found outside Lazzaretto Creek in Manoel Island was also marked as protected heritage last year.
Mepa’s Heritage Planning Unit head Joe Magro Conti pointed out that scheduling this site meant a balance would have to be struck between protecting this ship and the marina’s needs in the future.
Neolithic tombs in Kerċem were also scheduled after the parish priest found human bones beneath the floor of his bathroom tiles while doing works to extend the room.
Casa Lanfreducci in Valletta, which has caused a stir after the government announced it planned to use its basement as a backstage facility for the open air theatre, has not yet been scheduled, Mr Magro Conti said. An NGO recently claimed that remains found a few years ago in the basement of the house dated back to the time of the Great Siege of 1565.
5 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Ivan Cassar
Jan 26th 2011, 07:52
At last something seems to moving in the right direction. How long will it take before political pressure is applied and the process sabotaged?
Victor Paul Borg
Jan 25th 2011, 23:21
Refusing to sanctioning buildings that have already been build is an exercise on paper. The reality is that these six developments are standing and functioning. So what's the point of telling us they have not been sanctioned?
Haven't you already failed in your job by allowing these six illegal developments - plus thousands and thousands more - to be build in the first place? Do you expect our applause for failing in your duty to prevent illegal development?
There is only one way to redeem yourselves: knock down these developments and rehabilitate the area to the state it was before these illegal developments. Then you would have something to talk about - and we, the law-abiding people, would have something to listen to.
So, when are you going to remove these developments?
www.victorborg.com
Joe Hollier
Jan 25th 2011, 19:26
What will be done to these six illegal properties now?
j gatt
Jan 25th 2011, 16:18
How about the sanctioning of a fish processing factory in the Selmun area? Please anyone explain
Peter Murray
Jan 25th 2011, 10:57
It would be interesting to learn precisely how MEPA intend to achieve this noble aim and objective of clamping down on Illegal Development given that MEPA have contracted =-out this task to a third party, Aurelia Management Ltd., who just happens to be security guard patrol service?