‘Judgment was about procedure, not merits of plant application’
The government is seeking legal advice on whether to appeal against a Constitutional court decision which ordered the re-hearing of the planning appeal over the Marsascala Sant’Antnin recycling plant.
The court held that the Malta Environment and Planning Authority’s appeals board which determined the plant application in 2005 was not impartial or independent.
It therefore found that then Environment Minister George Pullicino had breached the human rights of Marsascala residents because his ministry was responsible for the recycling plant application and the appointment of the board.
Reacting, Mr Pullicino and the Parliamentary Secretariat for the Environment (then responsible for Mepa) said the judgment did not enter into the merits of the planning application but focused on the procedure adopted to appoint the appeals board.
“The government acted according to legal provisions at the time, which stipulated that appeals had to be heard before the planning appeals board”, which had been appointed according to law, the statement said.
The government said it abided by all national and EU legislation throughout the process for the recycling plant permit’s approval.
“This was confirmed in two separate decisions by the European Commission and the Petitions Committeee of the European Parliament, and the court judgment does not put this into doubt,” the government said.
The recycling plant was inaugurated two months ago after the government went ahead with the project despite pending legal challenges.
The plant is a crucial cog in government’s waste management strategy since it processes up to 71,000 tonnes of waste – a third of what it was originally intended to handle.
Separated waste is taken to the recycling plant to be packaged for export or re-use, while other organic waste is processed into compost.
The latter process, which is radically different from the previous way in which compost was created at the plant, will also generate electricity.
2 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joe Zammit
Jan 23rd 2011, 18:58
If you have the slightest trace of decency you would resign.
Saviour Grech
Jan 23rd 2011, 10:51
Ghaziz Ministru basta tara r-reazzjoni tan-nies fil-kummenti taghhom fl-artiklu ‘front page’ tat-Times tal-bierah u ghandek tifhem jekk tnehhi l-arroganza li hakmet il-Ministeru tieghek li n-nies specjament dawk ta’ Marsaskala u tal-madwar ma jaqblux mieghek. Mhux talli chadthom minn smigh ta’ Appell gust u hela ta’ hames snin bl-ispejjes li sofrew imma talli ksirt id-dritt fundamentali taghhom. Issa trid tkompli tidhak bihom billi taghmel appell kontra s-sentenza Kostituzzjonali li sabitek hati.
Minflok tirrezenja bhal ma jaghmlu nies serji fl-EU trid tibqa’ tissokkta bl-arroganza tieghek. Fuq kollox qabel ma tirrizenja ghandek titlob apologija pubblika lin-nies ta’ Wied il-Ghajn. Ghandna impjant li nbena tista’ tghid illegali ghax inkiser id-dritt ta' Appell fiz-zmien li kellu jigi ggustifikat il-permess li nghata b’hafna irregolaritajiet li kif jaf il-Ministru hemm Kawza Civili tikkontesta dan kollu. Fir-rapport tal-Awditur tal-Mepa li ghadu mizmum ghal pubbliku hemm car l-involviment tieghek bhala Ministru fid-decizjonijiet li hadu il-WasteServ u l-Mepa.
Ghid il-verita' li l-EU ma dahlitx fil-kwistjoni fejn ghandu jinbena l-impjant. Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea qalet li huwa kompitu tal-pajjiz fejn se isir il-progett li jiddeciedi. Infatti l-EU ghamlitha cara li kwistjonijiet bhal dawn jigu solvutu fil-Qrati lokali. Il-Qorti ta' Malta sabitek hati. Ghamel pjacir lill-Pajjizna u rrizenja llum qabel ghada.