Advert

Liquigas asks court to stop competitor storing its cylinders

Liquigas has filed an application in court for the issuing of a warrant to stop Easygas from collecting LPG cylinders belonging to Liquigas.

“In a competitive market, the practice of collecting and storing containers of one’s competitor is certainly not acceptable. Furthermore, the practice of cylinder exchange is totally prohibited in European countries, where legislation imposes precise obligations for removing cylinders from the market," Liquigas said.

In the privatisation exercise, Liquigas inherited all Enemalta Corporation’s yellow and brown cylinders under the terms of an agreement signed on 28 November 2008. Subsequently, Liquigas started an extensive retesting process of the LPG cylinders, and in the process started changing their colour from yellow and brown to Liquigas green. Since 2009, Liquigas also purchased new green cylinders and these were put on the market.

Amid the controversy which developed as Liquigas started demanding receipts from consumers who wished to return its cylinders, Maltagas started to take the Liquigas cylinders itself when consumers wished to make the switch to its product.

Liquigas stated that Easygas’s withholding of Liquigas’s cylinders was manifestly illegal and abusive because it constituted a violation of Liquigas’s proprietory rights, both material and intellectual.

"It is obvious that a company operating in the LPG sector should have total control over its cylinders even for reasons of safety relating to the cylinders in which it sells its LPG," Liquigas said.

"In this case, Liquigas is being prejudiced also because part of its stock of cylinders is being withheld at Easygas, causing Liquigas stock of cylinders to shrink."

Mr Justice Caruana Demajo assigned the hearing for February 9.

The application was signed by Dr Richard Camilleri, Dr Stephen Muscat and P.L. Christina Fiorini Lowell.

Advert

34 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

gcForte

Jan 22nd 2011, 14:41

A very good observation, and calculation.........which I agree.

L Cardona

Jan 22nd 2011, 11:48

Go was ordered to let it's infrastructure to be used by its competitor Melita.

gcForte

Jan 22nd 2011, 13:56

First of all, if I am not mistaken, cylinders are filled equal automatically, there will be checks for leakages, by employers, but sometimes, a cylinder or two escape the check. So, the best thing you do is, invest in a good normal bathroom scale, and when the deliveryman comes, check it yourself on the scale.

Stephen Koludrovic

Jan 22nd 2011, 15:48

Yeah sure, I'll just take the scales to the truck and measure it over there. Ha. Ha.
So I'll go 1 full cylinder - 1 empty cylinder should give the correct amount of gas, right?

Ramon Casha

Jan 22nd 2011, 17:47

@gcForte: I know for a fact that, at least until very recently, gas cylinders delivered to areas with a large population of tourists or summer residences were either only partly filled, or someone is making money by "sharing" the gas from each new cylinder with a returned empty one, and selling them as full.

J Fenech

Jan 22nd 2011, 10:22

I think the only reason why easygas are "storing" liquigas cylinders is becuase liquigas want to rip us of by only giving us € 5 becuase we don't have non existant deposit receipts.

I am prety sure they would give the cylinders back to liquigas if liquigas payback the €25 deposit they are currently charging.

A. Mifsud

Jan 22nd 2011, 12:16

I don't think easygas stands to profit from such move. When a customer returns an empty liquigas tank they're giving a new one back anyway. No?

So at the end they're not gaining any benefit.

gcForte

Jan 22nd 2011, 12:28

@ J Fenech & joanna farrugia..........Yes I believe it is a rip off, coming from the side of Liquigas. I came to this conclusion because,if the customer lost or threw it in the dustbin, because A. if you keep all the receipts that we will have through our lives, we will have no place to live in our houses, because the receipts will take over. B. Who can imagine that today`s government was going to get rid of all the fat cows that the governments of 20-30 years ago had created . The point that I wish to enforce is, IF THE CUSTOMER LOST / THREW AWAY the receipt, the Liquigas should have inherited the original or the copy of all those who put the deposit on the cylinder. If they LOST / THREW AWAY the receipts, they are guilty as much as the customer. I have always been thought that THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT.

Advert
Advert