Advert

Fr Mark Montebello 'rethinking' his strategy

Controversial Dominican priest Mark Montebello is currently “rethinking his strategy” following a stint in Mexico - to see how he could be more effective.

Last March, Fr Montebello was summoned to Rome for a meeting with the head of the Dominican Order, Fr Carlos Aspiroz Costa, in the wake of some comments he wrote in the newspapers. It was later decided that he should spend some time of reflection in Mexico. He returned to Malta at the beginning of December.

Speaking on Radio Malta this morning in the programme Ghandi x’Nghid, Fr Montebello Mark said he was currently at a crossroad - re-examining his strategy.

He said he had to think about the effectiveness of what he used to do

“I feel I was not being so effective for several reasons. I feel I do need to rethink my strategy to be more effective... I am seeing how I can be equally strong but clearer,” he said.

Fr Mark said that one of the things which bothered him before he left Malta was when people saw him as an enemy of the church.

“How can this be so when I am a member of this church which I love,” he said.

Replying a series of questions by presenter Andrew Azzopardi and others, including TV presenter Peppi Azzopardi, Fr Gorg Dalli, Fr Ray Francalanza and former minister Michael Falzon, Fr Mark said that if there had been people who had wished him ill before he left Malta, they remained disappointed

“I took this opportunity to learn as I take all other opportunities and it has served me well... I still have to make head and tail of it... In its 800 years my order has always sought to be a pioneer, on the frontline. This is a situation which exposes oneself.”

Asked about the archbishop, a fellow Dominican, Fr Mark said he felt there were ties which had curbed a bit of his Dominican spirit.

“I have known him for many years and I know he can be more of a pioneer. But there are institutional and bureaucratic, political forces which are curbing him.”

Advert

79 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

DGalea

Jan 24th 2011, 14:33

A religious order is like a club.
Its members are obliged to follow a set of rules and regulations whilst partaking in the rights and privilges that come with such membership.
One is free to join , resign ,join another club full of like-minded individuals, or like a certain Martin Luther, set up his own rival club ,

Andrew Farrugia

Jan 24th 2011, 12:46

Try being a tad more relevant rather than resorting to vague generalisations -"thinking inside and outside boxes" - and labeling people as "sheep". Are you sure you are aware of particular responsibilities which go hand in hand with one's station in life? Are you aware of how particular messages emanating from certain sources are perceived by others? Probably not and you do not seem to care, either!

charles caruana

Jan 24th 2011, 13:51

'Authority is not always right' Agreed, but there are ways and ways, some helpful, some harmful of 'challenging' authority. And you don't have to box yourself in your own authority to think outside the box. Can you imagine a St Dominic participating in some kind of Medieval equivalent of Liquorish? And by the way, Christ had only positive word to say about sheep.

J Farrugia

Jan 24th 2011, 14:02

Both the sheep as well as the wolves will have to face God at the end of their life here on earth and to each will receive HIS JUDGEMENT, not yours. You will also receive your judgement for being cynical. remember: death judgement heaven or hell. These 4 words used to be taught by Dun George Preca and they are called in-Novissmi, and nobody whever he is and how high or low he is, ever laughed at them.

Andrew Farrugia

Jan 24th 2011, 09:22

Coming from someone who harbours strong doubts about God ("if there is such an entity "), it is hardly surprising that you cannot even understand what i wrote.

charles caruana

Jan 24th 2011, 10:52

The great difference that seems to be escaping you is that Christ changed things and started a new religion not by taking the lives of others, but by giving his life for others. A historically loaded word like revolution is inapplicable here, however faddish it might sound to naive ears. The French and Russian revolutions certainly produced change, but also Napoleon and Stalin, and their millions of victims.

P.Pulis

Jan 23rd 2011, 19:52

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself."
~Rudyard Kipling ~

charles caruana

Jan 23rd 2011, 20:38

Is this the same Rudyard Kipling who was a good storyteller but a fervent imperialist? Imperialists are quite good at maintaining their individuality, but hardly give a damn about the individuality of their colonial subjects.

Andrew Farrugia

Jan 23rd 2011, 18:27

You will soon be telling us that Jesus Christ was a revolutionary, who preached communism or socialism or any other form of -ism! To be sure, we have heard such nonsense before, as in the blasphemous comparisons with Guevara, etc. ! But that was way back in the 60s!

Dr Francis Saliba

Jan 23rd 2011, 19:03

There is one thing wrong with your argument. Christ himself was THE authority - not the Pharises, not the Saducees, not the Herodians etc who did not even recognize that the Messiah was already among them. There is no logical comparison between Christ and Fr Montebello.

DGalea

Jan 23rd 2011, 19:19

Do you think that if Jesus lived today he would appear on a popular tv program on a private channel and minimize and trivialise child abuse and condem the setting up of the pedophile register?

Christian Sciberras

Jan 24th 2011, 09:54

How is someone expressing his opinions, arrogant?

On the other hand, someone, such as you, forcing someone else to remain silent, IS arrogant.

Joanna Farrugia

Jan 24th 2011, 18:24

@Christian Sciberras I never said Fr Montebello is arrogant for expressing his opinions. It is the way he expresses them and his choice of words that is arrogant. Neither am I 'forcing' Fr Montebello to 'remain silent'. I am merely commenting upon his supposed vow of obedience which he himself took upon himself as part of his vocation. It is certainly not I who imposed anything on him but he himself did.

Christian Sciberras

Feb 17th 2011, 22:57

Nice play on the words, but that won't work with me, sorry:

"I never said Fr Montebello is arrogant" => "your arrogant words" - for how can someone utter arrogant words without being arrogant? Unless you're telling us that words (hence language) are to blame?

As to his vow, you just made that up - there's no rule which states that Catholics (priests, whatever) can have any opinions at all.
And since it's only you that is making up these accusations, it's you that is "forcing" him to remain silent.

Dr Francis Saliba

Jan 23rd 2011, 17:36

Both. Nessun Dorma sung by Pavarotti is highly relevant - sung by me it is best forgotten.

Dr Francis Saliba

Jan 23rd 2011, 10:55

@ Margaret Richards.

If you press the "Caps Lock" key again you will be able to submit comments in traditional Upper Case/ Lower case mode, and consequently your comment would become more readable and less stressful on eyes and brain.

Andrew Farrugia

Jan 23rd 2011, 10:57

Do you actually need to SCREAM so much in order to hurl insults at others!

DGalea

Jan 24th 2011, 15:19

If you do not shout so much , you might actually hear what others have to say.

Joseph Abela

Jan 22nd 2011, 22:35

Ah, Mr Andrew Farrugia, the constant militiaman the Church in Malta has, always coming to the aid of the ecclesia mater, to defend her without knowing what you are defending in reality. Have you ever heard Fr Mark during Mass? No, I suppose not.

Andrew Farrugia

Jan 23rd 2011, 10:32

@ Mr J Abela

Ha! The usual writer of what is irrelevant and dispenser of offensive epithets. For your information, when i go to Mass i am interested in the word of God. I have no time for modern day quacks!

Lorry Borg

Jan 22nd 2011, 17:38

Pele - Brazil - forsi tfixkilt sieheb... imma Patri Montebello ntbaghat il-Messiku.

Bir-ragunament tieghek - li hu car li hu mmotivat mill-genwinita' - S. Frangisk ma kien jaghmel xejn...

Oqghod attent, l-Ispirtu s-Santu jista' jitkellem minn fomm il-Papa (ghad li mhux minn fomm KULL Papa) u jista' jitkellem minn fomm ohrajn, uhud patri u membri tal-ordnijiet monastici, uhud lajci u zghar...

Alla hu kbir wisq ghal mohh il-bniedem... l-umilta' titlob li ma nkunux rigidi, imma nkunu b'ghajnejna u mohhna miftuhin il-hin kollu...

Sliem.

M.Cachia

Jan 22nd 2011, 17:49

The fact you said he went to Brazil shows how much you actually read the article, which in turn shows how seriously we should take your comments.

Oh - and don't shout, it's rude!

john hili

Jan 23rd 2011, 16:59

L-umilta tixghel fik. Nies bhalek trid fi hdana il Knisja halli iktar tigbed fidili u injoranti lejja. Hallina man !!!!!!!

J Borg

Jan 22nd 2011, 16:05

guess living the true spirit of God's unconditional love, rather than seeking to please his supposedly earthly 'superiors' and their charades....

Marton Saliba

Jan 22nd 2011, 16:16

Why don't you get off your seat and figure out? Fr. Mark doesn't go in the Limelight, theLimelight follows him.
You should listen to his sermons, then you'll realize.

Welcome back Father Montabello, you're a light in the darkness that shrouds humanity, locally and beyond.

m borg

Jan 22nd 2011, 16:35

@ J Borg Your comment “rather than seeking to please his supposedly earthly 'superiors' and their charades....” is interesting and if anything confirms that there is reason to be concerned.

J Borg

Jan 22nd 2011, 18:10

...put it this way...
where do you really feel/see God?
In elaborate expensive church decorations and pagents? hanging crosses? in institutionalised establishment? OR
In sharing and effectively aiding the plight of who is outcasted, persecuted, victimised?

In truth - it takes much more than flashy smiles, to be of effective service and help!

m borg

Jan 22nd 2011, 19:01

@ J Borg

I most certainly do not see God in the way Fr. Montebello acts the rebel. In the many instances he challenged authority, he gained little or nothing in terms of helping the victimised but a great deal in terms of media space.

Coming back to my original question: what exactly is his objective when he acts the rebel?

J. Borg

Jan 23rd 2011, 14:36

not beating about the bush and saying the crude truth may sound like a rebel for some - especially those comfortable in their position within the status quo.....

and as for helping the victimised....guess you must be doing your own fair share, if you deem that his efforts to raise awareness and live through individuals' experiences, can be so discounted.

Mark-Anthony Fenech

Jan 23rd 2011, 14:41

Jesus Christ was pretty rebellious during his time, the way he challenged the authorities of his time; the Pharisses, the Elders etc.. He was considered so dangerous that he was crucified.. So in being a rebel, in challenging the authorities and calling a spade a spade, one may see God, if there is such an entity, acting through Fr.Mark Montebello.

J. Borg

Jan 22nd 2011, 14:30

maybe that is why the church striving to protect itself as an institution has somehow stumbled on for 2000 years.....
but failed to effectively remain in touch with the daily lives and realities of ordinary but reasonable people.

David Caruana

Jan 22nd 2011, 14:09

I strongly believe he does so every day.

Jesmond Micallef

Jan 22nd 2011, 14:04

Furthermore, but don't ever forget that there is also God's will in you !!

Joseph M. Scicluna

Jan 22nd 2011, 16:05

Mela qatt ma ftaht gazzetti pro PL u taqra certi klerici x'jiktbu? Dawn qatt ma gew eziljati. U iva, din wahda minn tas-soltu - nippoliticizzaw kollox.

David Caruana

Jan 22nd 2011, 13:28

Where on earth do you sense any "sting" in his words?!

Where you by any chance one of those mentioned and that's why such comment irked you so much?

G. Mangion

Jan 22nd 2011, 17:44

@David Caruana

I feel STING's in his words yes indeed and if you have not well my dear friend that is your Problem, and a very BIG one too. for your Iformation no I never even met this so called Priest
and I have no intention to do so ! But again Yes there are Hundreds of Families which have been irked no ??? We all know how stubborn & arrog he can be... maybe he need's another holiday too...........

David Caruana

Jan 22nd 2011, 18:08

There you go... the truth has finally surfaced :

"so called Priest"
"I have no intention to (meet him)"
"stubborn"
"arrog(ant)"
"he need's another holiday"

Why all this hate?

G.Mangion

Jan 22nd 2011, 18:45

David Caruana thank You for reapitng my comment so I qoute only your last for words: (Why all this hate?)
Do not mix gas mal hass,
I dont hate no one belief it or not, but it seems that I am not for the priest is that Hate Wrong David Wrong, you cannot even understand my comment in simple words. Full Stop.

isabelle luca borg

Jan 24th 2011, 13:16

@Mangion...yeah well maybe if you start writing in good and understandable English we'd be able to understand you...

Advert
Advert