Divorce movement complains to BA about Monday's Bondi Plus
The Moviment IVA ghall-Ligi tad-Divorzju has written to the Broadcasting Authority saying it does not feel that next Monday’s Bondi Plus will refect “a balanced and adequate representation of all interested parties on the issue of divorce”.
It said that the programme will only feature a one-to-one interview with Andre’ Camilleri, chairman of Zwieg Minghajr Divorzju.
“Given that this is a matter of public interest and national importance we feel that programmes regarding the divorce issue should be balanced.
“In such programs one should, therefore, have members of both sides discussing on an equal footing, which means that both sides have to be interviewed in the same manner.
“Having one side presenting its views in the studio with the facility of making counter-arguments and the other side presenting its views only in clips without such a facility is not considered as balance.”
The movement said that, because of this, it refused to give clips for Bondi Plus and passed on its concerns to the relevant authorities.
See also:
24 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Pace
Jan 23rd 2011, 11:39
Why is it that in this country fairness seems to be such a problem? Moviment IVA are only asking for balance so that the viewers will come to their own conclusions after having heard both sides of the argument. Their objection to giving clips comes from the fact that these create a situation where the viewers are made to believe that there is a balance when, in fact, there is not. Is it the first time that people who give interviews get quoted out of context and then find themselves unable to comment because they are at home? I think that the pro-divorce movement simply does not want to risk having its words twisted because the issue at hand deserves to be treated with great care. It shows responsibility and a proper attitude towards the discussion of serious issues.
M Vella
Jan 23rd 2011, 09:41
@J Camilleri
Re: "If you would like to get Divorced, why don't you all go and live somewhere else and leave us all in the peace of God."
How right you are ... then you can come back here and register your "previous marriage dissolved" in the Public Registry and marry again in Malta in your "peace of God".
It will be probably better than getting a divorce in Malta whenever and however that is made possible!
What hypocrisy!
Wayne Hewitt
Jan 23rd 2011, 00:44
With all due respect this issue requires a healthy discussion with both parties present and not a one way irrational diatribe as expected by the anti-divorce 'movement'. If this thing is going to go ahead as planned then I believe that for the sake of balance Bondiplus should invite JPO for a one on one interview the following week.
david debattistad
Jan 22nd 2011, 20:11
Tolerance my foot, you have no idea of its meaning , Look at it this way, I did not call you EVIL!
Try again Adrian Cardona, but then what I say is fact there are other things which should worry us more about our children then the issue of divorce think about it . Oh YES zero tolerance.
yaz tabone
Jan 22nd 2011, 19:35
i don't agree with this at all! a referendum is going to be held, so people need to understand both sides. i know what the anti-divorce movement is about, and what the pro-divorce is about. this program needs a proper debat, 2 representatives from both sides talking and explaining their views.
SANDRO - don't blab bout rights, you have no idea what rights are! where is our right to do what we want with our lives? where is our right to move on from a broken marriage?
J CAMILLERI - you think by not legalizing divorce, its going to make marriages any different? arguments will still take place. couples will still split up. i spoke to a priest today who told me that god is just being used, and its true! no one is looking at the real picture and everyone just chooses to stay ignorant.
"if you would (NOT) like to get Divorced" then just don't get divorced! it's so simple.
he has definately got my vote, n many others :) who wants cowards anyways
Joseph Calleja
Jan 22nd 2011, 15:10
To be fair Bondiplus should give the Pro Divorce Side a one on one chance to appear.. I always thought Bondiplus was a well balanced show. I don't know what the story is now but it does seem that Mr Bondi is presenting a one sided scale. Bondiplus is very aware that in order to be fair there has to be a Pro and a Con but maybe he has a hidden agenda for permitting only the one side. After all this is Public TV and both sides are entitled to express their views. So in all I am sure Mr Bondi has a good explanation for presenting only the one side. Could it be the Pro Divorce side declined his offer to appear? Mr Bondi I think the Pro Divorce side is entitled to a rebuttal unless you were ordered to do otherwise..
Kenneth Williams
Jan 22nd 2011, 18:32
I always thought Bondiplus was a well balanced show...........Mela ma tiflahx illum biex qed tahseb hekk?????
Peter Korsten
Jan 22nd 2011, 18:59
Bondiplus is balanced if you consider the views of the PN as the centre of that balance. Lou Bondi is a lot of things, but unbiased he is not.
E. Azzopardi
Jan 22nd 2011, 15:01
With all the events happening of late and not so of late, we have made this country of ours, Malta, a total circus and the laughing stock of many. Can't we realize that we should be more mature and serious in what we do and how we act? Is it possible that we have not learnt from our past mistakes and from others, who are much better than us? It seems not. .
J. Camilleri
Jan 22nd 2011, 14:47
Divorce NO
Strong Marriages YES
I hope that after the Divorce Movement loses this issue with a landslide JPO doesn't start crying once again.
Ser titlef xeba voti man!! min dak li qed nisma
If you would like to get Divorced, why don't you all go and live somewhere else and leave us all in the peace of God.
Joseph Calleja
Jan 22nd 2011, 15:32
After the Divorce Movement loses as you predict, what do you suggest? Maybe an annulment? Don't think so, too expensive. Even though many people would settle for an annulment which equals divorce, they cannot afford an annulment. I think most people would prefer to get an annulment because it absolves all. If you can afford to get an annulment, which most people cannot afford, then you can start from scratch like nothing ever happened, like you never been married at all. Annulment=divorce in a very controlled and elite way. Ask those who got one. Please don't bother to give me a different explanation of an annulment. Glass half full or half empty. l-ixkubetta fija il-grillu u kulkadd jghamel kif jaqbillu.
david debattista
Jan 22nd 2011, 15:46
Divorce No
Strong marriages yes
I am for strong marriages ALWAYS! but in real life nothing is perfect, not even nature!
It is lack of understand and facing the facts, realistic facts that is causing such problems .
This is not a political issue, just because you have a good marriage does not mean that all the rest are so lucky. Be realistic!
I hope the movement for pro divorce wins not because we will have divorce in Malta, but because it is one of the hard realities in life that some marriages do fail .
Chris Reiff
Jan 23rd 2011, 14:14
Why should we leave Malta instead of of fighting for our rights? What kind of uneducated state of mind is this? How about you leave Malta since you do not side with the Maltese national Team when they play Italy or England?
Anthony Castillo
Jan 22nd 2011, 14:34
Sur Jeffrey meta inti kont wahdek fuq DISSET kien tajjeb u stajt tighd li trid u kif jaqbillek siehbi.
joe cutajar
Jan 22nd 2011, 14:31
u morru saqqu il-hass tal marsa
Sandro Agius
Jan 22nd 2011, 14:17
Imma dawn ma jisthux...mela Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando ma kienx wahdu fuq Dissett. Kif ma jisthux? Ghax ma jilghabiex ta gurnalist ferkaz!!! Jaf kif!!!
Donnu kulhadd ghandu dritt jitkellem barra dawk li huma kontra d-divorzju. Fejn hija d-dritt ta l-espressjoni...kellkom cans...issa aghtu cans il-haddiehor
gcForte
Jan 22nd 2011, 14:13
LIQUIGAS vs EASYGAS...................MELITA CABLE vs GO ................GREEDY M.P`s vs NOT TOO MUCH GREEDY M.P`S.................issa ............." IVA " GHAD DIVORZJU vs " LE " GHAD DIVORZJU..........Tistaw tiddegiedu fejn sejrin.
Kenneth Williams
Jan 22nd 2011, 18:38
Backbenchers kontra il prim ministru.......tal linja kontra austin gatt..............tal monti l istess........tat taxis l istess......tal karozzini ukoll............l atturi kontra it teatru bla saqaf............ kulhadd kontra l progett ta pjano...ta wied il ghajn kontra l impjant tar riciklacc.........u tibqa sejjer hekk sakemm taqta nifsek :-))
Henry Spiteri
Jan 22nd 2011, 19:36
@gcForte & Kenneth Williams...Fil-hajja hekk sejrin, min jaqbel u min ma jaqbilx.Daqqa haga daq'ohra. :))
d.attard
Jan 22nd 2011, 13:25
But are not the national buttons usually pressed by hidden hands way out of the public's sight? Who knows what the powers that be have in store? Who knows what influence the anti-divorsists will bring to bear as they put on a smiling face to an unsuspecting public? The movement IVA need to take this as read and have their own strategy in place. Spending too much energy trying to counter hidden hands may mean too much wasted energy. the IVA argument is very powerful and games that will try to muddle these arguments as is already happening in a big way will only serve to finally expose the hidden power mongers.
david debattista
Jan 22nd 2011, 13:18
How primitive can you get ! You people make me sick , what a bunch of hypocrites
You should be more worried about sex predators running around with their handy or ipods showing porn to the under aged to lure them into sex, then all this drama about divorce.
Give me a break, and stop being a bunch of idiots.
Adrian Cardona
Jan 22nd 2011, 16:18
With the tolerance expressed in your post, I really wonder who is the idiot here.
D. Galea
Jan 22nd 2011, 13:06
Nhar l-Erbgħa fuq Disset (TVM) Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando waħdu kien. Hadd ma qal xejn.
c zammit
Jan 22nd 2011, 12:59
Il moviment favur iz zwieg missu jilmenta minn dissett mela!!