MP says TV providers must be forced to share football content
Nationalist MP David Agius has called on the Broadcasting Authority to force TV providers Melita and Go to share premium content, particularly football leagues for which they win the rights to broadcast through tendering.
Reigniting the much-publicised campaign he began last year to secure better options for consumers, Mr Agius told The Times that Malta could simply adopt the British model, where “must-share offers” are prescribed in licences granted to TV providers. This means the broadcasting watchdog would have to amend the licences it grants to TV providers to ensure sharing deals are done to benefit the consumer, without having to rely on the companies to come to such an agreement by themselves.
Mr Agius argues that this must be done before the three-year tenders are issued for the UEFA Champion’s League in the coming months. Those of the Italian and English leagues are expected to be issued over the next two years.
If Mr Agius’ call is heard, then Melita would be able to buy a number of Go’s premium channels and broadcast them to its own subscribers, and viceversa. This would allow customers to at least view the big games throughout the season. Those who wish to watch the full Italian league would still need to opt for the provider that owns the full rights. This would, however, avoid the current situation where to watch the big games of both domestic and European competitions, they have to subscribe to both providers.
This is the system used in the UK, according to Mr Agius, and it enables Sky Sports to be broadcast even on the systems of other operators.
Mr Agius argues that this would also help to solve the problem of the Dreambox and other internet satellite options which are becoming increasingly popular. Although Dreambox is not illegal in itself, the content-sharing process required to use it is not covered by law. If the police decide to crack down, as happened in Cyprus, their agents, and possibly even household users may be held responsible for breaching copyright regulations.
“People are prepared to pay for a good service they know is legitimate,” Mr Agius stresses, calling on both TV providers to see how this system could also benefit them in the long run.
However, Mr Agius’ main call is on the Broadcasting Authority to take “immediate action” before certain big football rights are put up for tender. This is because last year, when he began a campaign for content sharing, the rights had already been awarded and there was a feeling that any changes would be unfair shifting of goalposts.
Meanwhile, in changing the licences, the Broadcasting Authority could also ensure that if both Melita and Go chose to put up four channels each for sale to one another, these would be the four most popular, rather than the other way around.
Mr Agius added that this system would also make it fairer on consumers who today were signing up for two-year contracts with one provider which currently holds the rights to broadcast a popular football league, despite the fact that it may well lose those rights within a few months.
Popular Stories
Update 3: Woman found dead in car,...
Updated: Woman dies in car crash
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Part of Dwejra 'Azure window' collapses
The end of the bar that ‘never closed’
Bundy does not know whether to...
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
This WAS the night - Kurt makes it...
'No need for early election if PM's...
In Discussion
Updated - Jason Micallef demands...
Gozo tunnel could take 5-7 years to...
CABS remote controlled aircraft shot...
Carm Mifsud Bonnici resigns after...
Joseph Calleja condemns portrayal of...
Updated: Labour would give...
CABS drone shot down
Second group of migrants arrives
Adrian Vassallo in scathing...
61 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Alberto Mollicone
Jan 20th 2011, 08:58
Hon. Agius should also widen his interest and zeal and address the following: price increase of gas, milk, water, electricity, and flour (possibly bread); he should investigate why despite the government announced price reduction in some medicines this doesn't seem to be the case and prices are still high. If you have time then go into football rights ... this is what I call PRIORITIES!!!!!
CA Miller
Jan 20th 2011, 03:23
1. We have a few (just a few!!) bigger problems in this country than football on TV. How about you start earning your pay, including your recent raise, by focusing on more important issues?
2. Football on TV is a luxury and a commodity which companies should be able to buy and sell without interference from the government. If we don't want it, we won't buy it - we'll survive!!
Anthony Farrugia
Jan 19th 2011, 12:21
Company A bids for and gets the exclusive rights to provide Channel XYZ to the Maltese territory.
So how can it be obliged to provde this channel to all and sundry ? It would not make commercial sense and it would put off providers in bidding for the high quality channels. You get what you pay for. The times of jew b'xejn jew xejn are thankfully dead and buried.
Joey Grech
Jan 18th 2011, 22:12
Mr. David Agius could you please show that you really care about customers by helping the THOUSANDS of owners of second (summer holiday) flats who are being financially sucked dry by ARMS and your present very socially concerned administration?
Admit it please: You have been approached by several of these owners - usually old pensioners who purchased a flat to live close to the sea during the hot summer season now that they are too old and frail to go abroad for holidays. You promised to look into the problem....but the situation remains the same. Is that just?
Mr. Agius you must know that in the case of second homes ARMS has the nerve and the irresponsible audacity to consider these as having ZERO -0- residents, when in fact there are cases where such summer homes have four or even more persons residing therein. Social conscience indeed!
The Hon. P.M. also promised to look into this issue. Hopefully a way out will be found. Personally I will show my utter disgust of the present unjust and discriminatory scenario at the polling booth come election day.
P.N. wake up....stop angering people / voters!
Henry Tozer
Jan 18th 2011, 20:26
"If the police decide to crack down, as happened in Cyprus, their agents, and possibly even household users may be held responsible for breaching copyright regulations."
And what of Melita illegally broadcasting certain channels? Apparently it is okay for them to break copyright regulations. As usual, the government is focused on supporting the large companies (the ones that know the right people).
Not to mention, I have witnessed TVM broadcasting shows with well known music as the soundtrack. I highly doubt that TVM can afford the rights to a Pink Floyd song, if often times, the most costly aspect of a Hollywood movie is obtaining rights to songs. But nevermind, it's fine for a government department to break the Law.
A Camilleri
Jan 18th 2011, 18:35
Wow,... The MP persists in interfering in the free market with so much ardour and zeal. Receiving football broadcasts seems to have become some fundamental human right!
malcolm seychell
Jan 18th 2011, 17:57
There is another simple option. TVM should make a bid for these rights.
Lets say they offer a million euro(which i guess it will be the highest bid). Each citizen will be paying just over Euro 2 a year on average for watching football.
I think most people would agree to pay Euro from their paid taxes and be able to watch football
j micallef
Jan 18th 2011, 17:40
With all due respect to the hard-working Hon Agius, I find it hard to swallow that he is wasting hisprecious time and energy on this insignificant issue which after all concerns personal pastimes and hobbies which one can easily elect to do without if one wishes. I would have applauded Hon Agius more wholeheartedly had he used his drive to represent me and put forward with insistence and perseverance my constant worry and hardship about the astronomical rise in utility tariffs. I used to pay just €27 up to Oct 1998 for a year's electricity bill for the upkeep of my lift and half a dozen dim bulbs in a block of flats where I stay on the 4th floor. After the unjust rise in tariffs, the €27 turned to €290 - more than ten times as much -- and the lift is something I cannot do without as my wife and I are of advanced age and cannot manage the stairs now because of our frailty and state of health. These are the type of hard-hitting issues I would have liked Hon Agius and other people's representatives to tackle and battle with vigour.
Joseph V. Grech
Jan 18th 2011, 21:22
I agree whole-heartedly with Mr. J. Micallef's complaint. Mr. Micallef is obviously referring to the unjust, recently introduced Utilities Rates that are being applied blindly and insensitively for second residences.
My wife and I ourselves have a flat in St. Paul's Bay apart from our winter home. We are pensioners....surely we have every right to live six months in our summer flat and the remainder of the year in our winter house. Why should this administration fleece us where Utilities are concerned?
How arrogant of ARMS and this administration to consider that our summer flat has 0 residents - this so as to inflict the highest possible Utility rates on us!
Many owners of second (holiday) homes - used for their sole pastime and not commercially - - are being hit hard and swear they will show their disgust at the polling booth coming the next election.
Our approaches to Ministers, Parliamentary Secretaries, M.P.s.etc. (the Hon. P.M. and Mr. David Agius included) have resulted in sympathy but a deaf ear as far as corrective measures go. People are saying that this administration just won't listen to good sense and reason!
P.Cassar
Jan 18th 2011, 16:58
BUT DOES THIS MP REALLY KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT ????????
WASN'T HE HIMSELF A MAIN EXPONENT OF EU MEMBERSHIP WHICH IS BASED ON A FREE MARKET WITH ALL THAT THIS ENTAILS.
DOES HE REMEMBER THAT ALL OUR HOUSE FACADES WERE GIVEN TO MELITA FOR FREE TO AFFIX ITS BOXE
DOES HE REMEMBER THAT GOVT'S COAXIAL CABLES ALL OVER MALTA WERE ALSO GIVEN TO MELITA FOR FREE.
WHERE WAS HE THEN.......... all this happened just ten years ago.
David Jochum
Jan 18th 2011, 15:47
Issa trid titkellem? Ghax ma tkellimx qabel fuq din l-issue meta l-Melita kella ir-rights?
RMangion
Jan 18th 2011, 15:13
First and foremost I don't even care as I rarely watch football. However I think that MP's have betteer things to do then interfere in the free market.
Pierre Micallef Grimaud
Jan 18th 2011, 14:26
...and to add insult to injury, I just received the TV Licence Renewal Statement. What a joke. Everyone's taking us for a longgggg ride!
E. Azzopardi
Jan 18th 2011, 13:38
So, why was this not done before, when the first privider came to Malta? We have all these genuises being paid all this exorbant salaries and it seems that several of them can only see up to their noses? Why does it have to be an MP to tell them what to do? This is what they are being paid for. To protect the consumer. From what I have seen lately, they really have to pull their socks up or somebody, if their is somebody capable, tell them where to go.
Lawrence Zammit
Jan 18th 2011, 13:07
Mr Agius, why don't you turn to your government to keep his promise to abolish the TV licence which was promised in the election program and which up to now is still in force. Abolishing this TAX in the last budget prior to election will be like taking the people for a ride !
Peter Korsten
Jan 18th 2011, 12:57
Ah yes, that's what we need: more government interference. Not.
gaffarena joseph
Jan 18th 2011, 12:23
Better if you raise your voice as a gifted MP,and force them to lower their fees,because they are the highest being paid allover europe.
Mr. Agius,you know better than me the millions they are making anually from our not so full pockets,
MSciberras
Jan 18th 2011, 12:23
Somene here has described Malta as a banana republic in a debate on TV football rights?!..... A country that has amongst the EU's lowest unemployment rates, with free education right up to university, one of the world's best (free) health systems, that is the ONLY country in southern europe on course to reducing its deficit (not mentioning Ireland Belgium etc)............ Sure we have problems, but is THIS a banana republic.........or a nation with many ignorant people???????? How would the writer feel if:
(1) he faces increases in heating oil costs to 85 p a litre (as in the UK) and a heating bill (excluding electricity) of Stg 1600 per year, as many in the UK are facing this year?
(2) has an income of Stg 43000 a year before taxes (paradise to many Maltese and putting you in the top 20% of wage earners in the UK) and STILL cannot make ends meet or even hope to finance your children's university studies (source: London Sunday Times16.01.2010)?
(3) having your children graduate from University with average Stg 30,000 loan
(4) live in Italy where 300,000 young qualified Italians are expected to emigrate because they cant find work?
Get informed Malta!!!!!
C. Borg
Jan 18th 2011, 14:16
Come on, be realistic. We have lowest unemployment rate in Europe, because 60% of women never applied for work. In the UK only 6% of women don't work, than extra thousands will be in our list of unemployment. Most Maltese women prefer to depend on their husbands for their income. In other EU countries, nini nini they depend on their husband, they want their own financial independence. Now the younger women in Malta are starting to think differently.
Malta's deficit look lower because our deficit is mostly based on local loans from local funds and not from foreign funds.
Our weather keeps our heating bills to a minimum. But food is at least 20% higher than in the UK. Our children are spoilt when it comes to University costs as abroad, students need to have an evening job to pay for these costs, and not go to Paceville.
Banana republic maybe not yet, although most politicians treat us as chimpanzees, But then far from Genna ta l'art. Please don't compare us only with the worst, how about the rest. Just Cyprus, living costs similar, but wages 20% higher than ours despite many internal wars.
MSciberras
Jan 18th 2011, 15:32
(a) Malta's deficit remains the same whether borrowings are local or foreign, unless you are referring to exchange fluctuations from non-euro debt (which you aren't). Our 'banana-republic' generates enough cash to finance our loans.
(b) everytime Malta is compared to UK Ireland, Italy etc and shown to be doing better people say 'but why compare us only with the worst'?? Wow. So the UK is the 'worst'. It isn't. We all live in a harsh economic climate, something many Maltese dont accept.
(c) Food 20% higher than UK???! OK...and housing about 30% cheaper......!!!!
(d) no heating bills in Malta? And airconditioning? Overall household energy consumption in Malta remains lower than UK.
(e) Cyprus wages 20% higher? Is that based on gdp per capita? That of Cyprus, a success story by the way, is inflated by many corporate hq's who file accounts there, including some dodgy banks; actual wages are similar to Malta's.
(f) yes, Malta does need to raise its employment levels, which is in fact rising - but why jump to the conclusion that more women workers will not find jobs when the evidence is showing otherwise? L'aqwa immaqdru! Even free tertairy education means 'paceville' to you!
Inform yourself.
Dominic Chircop
Jan 18th 2011, 12:10
Sewwa jaghmlu Melita u Go.
Jithanzru bhal Ministri !!!!!
Viva Malta Cattolicissima !
Roderick Micallef
Jan 18th 2011, 11:43
'Forced to share??!!!' Are they legally obliged to say what you are saying dear Mr.David Agius? If not service providers are not disobeying any law and have every right to do what they are doing and they are paying for it. Unless YOU are willing to change the law and publish a white paper.
Jeremy J Camilleri
Jan 18th 2011, 11:35
Dreambox worrying David? I wonder why...Football monopoly has also been the order of the day for years and years...Its only now that the most honourable AGius is raising the issue...another question mark....Why not before?
John Borg
Jan 18th 2011, 11:34
Does David Agius know that there is no Broadcasting Authority at the moment as it's term expired in December as it has not been appointed yet? Why does no one speak about the need to regulate the use of Dreambox the money paid to Go and Melita stays in Malta and hopefully they will re invest to give a better service. with Dreambox, the money is going to Italy and the UK and soon no company will be able to afford to buy anymore programs as we will all be using Dreambox !
Jon Agius
Jan 18th 2011, 11:55
don't you know we're part of the EU?
Joseph Barbara
Jan 18th 2011, 11:20
Thank you David Agius. The present situation is so unfair to the consumer that I find it mind boggling that it has not been addressed by the consumer protection bodies in a decisive manner. The way it is now, there is no real competition and the consumer is 'forced' to subscribe to both providers if he wishes to have full sports coverage. Moreover, GO Sports, REPLACES the club channels when it is airing alive football matches. This is not right. For the fees we have to pay, we are getting a very poor return and we simply have to grin and bear it.
b.busuttil
Jan 18th 2011, 11:17
alla jbierek ghax tilfu ir-rights il melita......
R spiteri
Jan 18th 2011, 10:43
Good job David Agius. From all MPs, you were the only one who raised this issue.
Charles Sammut
Jan 18th 2011, 10:39
It is important that football be kept at the forefront as an important issue of national importance. Otherwise sheeple might have the time (and inclination) to start thinking. And we can't have that in a People's Democracy now, can we?
It's the old and proven tactic of 'Panem et Circenses'.
M. Mamo
Jan 18th 2011, 11:08
oh get a life ... so obsessed with politics
ASpiteri
Jan 18th 2011, 12:28
@mamo
The get a life syndrome!
So mr sammut should get a life because he expects parliamentarians to get busy on more important issue rather than football matches?
More than getting a life, people like you should actually get real...prioritize football before important matters is a sign that one is alienated from the real world. That kind of individual is the ideal person for those who rule us.
Hitler once said...”How lucky are government that people don’t think”
We might think...but waste our thoughts on stupid things!
Frans H Said
Jan 18th 2011, 10:37
With all due respect I do not agree. Either we follow the EU rules and have free competition or else imposition. People do have a clear choice, if they do not like the cable TV providers, they can install a sattelite dish and have a wide range of sports toiwatch, not just English and Italian football, but also othet countries (Germany, Spain, France, etc.). Obviously, they will have to pay to obtain access!!!!
I will not accept that any one provider uses behing the scene tricks against his competitor. It will be a sad day for Malta and free competition if this was to happen. Malta will revert to the DESERTA chocolate, etc.
Wake up to reality and study the implications in your suggestion
Ramon Casha
Jan 19th 2011, 06:10
Exclusivity goes against the spirit of competition, and is contrary to consumer rights. It is unreasonable to expect subscribers to buy a premium TV service from two (and in future, possibly more) providers to be able to follow football matches from different countries.
I don't think that Mr. Agius is proposing that the providers share the content for free. Go, Melita and/or other providers would pay each other for the right to transmit the matches in question.
Claude Camilleri
Jan 18th 2011, 10:05
Issa jrid jitkellem David Agius? Ghax ma tkellimx qabel fuq din l-issue meta l-Melita kella ir-rights?
Joe Azzopardi
Jan 18th 2011, 09:54
The issue here is that operators who win the right to certain content automatically become dominant in that particular market, which by itself is anti-competitive. In most EU countries this situation is addressed through regulation and imposes obligations on operators to share their content for a reasonable and fair price. I think nobody expects any operator to share their broadcasting rights for free but through a wholesale agreement they increase the distribution of the end product, make popular content more accessible and prices more affordable. In the UK market BSkyB makes a handsome profit from wholesaling Sky Sports 1,2 and 3 to Virgin and likewise it would be expected that local operators also make a handsome profit through a wholesale structure. The material difference would be the cost of acquisition. If wholesale obligations are imposed the cost of acquiring content would be lower and therefore more affordable at the retail level. If done properly and diligently a win-win scenario will prevail, because at the moment the current situation continues to favour the illegal distribution of card sharing scams and the operators know too well that this is not in their interest.
ASpiteri
Jan 18th 2011, 09:50
May i ask to the honorable mp, if he’s aware that right owners offer completely different packages to small markets such as ours?
For a small market like Malta, where for example melita only had 18,000 subscribers for its sports channels, right owners such as Serie A and English Premiership will sell territorial exclusivity to one single company and won’t offer any sharing rights between different companies.
Having said this, may i ask if our esteemed parliamentarians have more important matters to discuss in the country’s highest institution, rather than football matches rights?!
John Inguanez
Jan 18th 2011, 13:19
Yeah Mr Spiteri. Has anyone here ever saw a rights contract between right holders and the local providers. I have seen and I don't see any possibility for sharing. What is possible is that matches are transmatting after a certain cooling off period. Punto e basta.
This is a competitive market. Don't you see that the both providers want the best. Melita had every chance to bid, they said they had other alternatives. You can't have all the cake and eat it.
joe borg
Jan 18th 2011, 09:47
Kemm qedin sew. In-nies jitkellmu fuq kif ser jixtru l-hobza ta' kuljum u s-Sur Agius fuq it-trasmissjonijiet tal-futbol. L-ewwel il-pappa imbaghad l-impappa!
Jurgen Grech
Jan 18th 2011, 16:26
Mhux ghal xi haga ta, imma mhux kulhadd mejjet bil-guh! Anke jekk toghla, il-hobza ta kuljum 99% fostna kapaci jixtruha! jien sakhemm nibqa nara in-nies ghand tal-lottu kull nhar ta sibt u nhar ta erbgha ma naccettax li hawn il-faqar u l-guh f'dan il-pajjiz!
Mirko Zagami
Jan 18th 2011, 09:43
Mr Agius should be reminded that there are far more pressing and important issues to be tackled for the good of the country. I am personally extremely irked at such a waste of time and overall taxpayer money.
Lawrence Camilleri
Jan 18th 2011, 09:41
Where was the Hon David Agius MP when Melita only had the sacrosant right to transmit the said football matches? Does he own shares in Melita or he has an interest in lending a hand to the provider rather than in the consumer?
K.Anastasi
Jan 18th 2011, 09:40
David Agius.... to be honest this country (Banana Republic) has more important issues to tackle ... but maybe you are trying to take the light off other things, typical PN tactic!
Mark Portelli
Jan 18th 2011, 09:26
Good Idea - now he can justify his Parliamentary Wage rise!
Go back to the radio Station
Carmen Micallef
Jan 18th 2011, 09:17
What is the point in bidding for the rights and then sharing them with the losing bidders, or those who where not even interesting in bidding? In the UK they only watch 2 to 3 games a week. We are lucky in Malta to be able to watch all the games.
Generoso seychell
Jan 18th 2011, 09:16
Just to remind me.When there was a monpoly,there was ''forced to share football '' or not.!!!!
Why now !!!!
I think that Onor.D Agius was there,but...............
M Attard
Jan 18th 2011, 09:12
I ask again why now , we cannot even see a Maltese premiere leauage game on all stations in this country why not speak about that Mr. Agius
CH. Xuereb
Jan 18th 2011, 09:11
"sharing of channels" isiru f kull pajjiz iccivilizzat. Ghaliex jien ghandi indahhal sewgt servizzi biex inkun nista insegwi il football u programmi ohra? Ghaliex hemm bzonn ta MP biex iqajjem dan is suggett? Ghaliex ma kienetx l-Awtorita innifisa b'par idejn sodi biex tiehu azjoni? Jien insaqsi x'hinuma jamlu dawn li qedin impjegati f'din l'Awtorita?
K Muscat
Jan 18th 2011, 09:11
Dear David Agius,
It's obvious you have your own agenda behind this. Who on earth will relinquish something that costs thousands of euros just to keep the competitor's customers happy?? Why speak now??
simon farrugia
Jan 18th 2011, 09:02
@Mary Mizzi
I fully agree with your comment. It is better that this Government keeps its promise to remove the TV license because we are paying it for just NOTHING at all.
A Balzan
Jan 18th 2011, 08:56
Illegizlaw fil-Parlament jekk hemm bzonn.
Toqghodx tistenna l-MCA.
Milli jidher kellek l-appogg ta' MP's laburisti s-sena l-ohra bhal Chris Cardona u Chris Agius, mela ftehmu u resqu ligi f'dan is-sens....
Mghandiex dubju ssib l-appogg taz-zewg nahat. Mill-bqija bl-appelli biss ghalxejn kull ma tkun qieghed taghmel tfittex reklam ghalik u d-dilettant jibqa' jsaffar.
Patrick bellia
Jan 18th 2011, 08:41
Jiena napprezza li qed tipprova taghmel minn kollox biex din is sitwazzjoni tigi rrangata, Jiena xbajt u meta nghid xbajt, xbajt vera, nkellem lin nies kemm tal Melita u kemm tal GO fuq il pakketti li ghandhom, Mela persuna trid ir reception, tista tiehu ir reception biss, u jiena ghax irrid il football biss ma nistax niehdu wahdu imma rrid niehdu bilfors mas silver fil kaz tal GO u mar receprion meta kien il kaz tal Melita. Jekk vera dawn il kumpaniji irdu lin nies tmur abbonata maghhom ghandom jaraw xi jrid il klijent inkwistjoni. Jiena nimmagina li jekk kemm il darba isir hekk anke bhala abbonati izidu, Biss kull meta kellemt lil Custumer Care tat tnejn li huma dejjem l istess twegiba hadd, trid tiehu s silver jew trid tiehu r reception mieghu, Jiena ghalija diga mhiex fair ma min irid lisports biss. Jekk fl EU hawn is suq hieles ghaliex ahna ma nistawx nabbonaw mal SKY ezempju, Haddiem jigi jahdem hawm minghajr problema ghax ma hemmx fruntieri, allura dan ghaliex ma jistax ikun fil kaz tat TV ukoll, imbghad naraw jittrangawx l affarijiet hawn malta u jkollnix prezzijiet li jiflahom kullhadd
joe sciberras
Jan 18th 2011, 08:40
Can we force ministers to share their honoraria with the common citizen? Because that is what is really worrying the common citizen.
John Micallef
Jan 18th 2011, 08:37
Joke of the day!! u ma tarax David li hadd fl-2011 hass ma jista jghamel din il-haga li qed titlob int!!
Charity begins @ home, mela ghid il- istazzjon tan-net jaqsam ir-rights li xtara tal- MFA ma l-istazjonijiet kollha. Jehtfuk fil- kelma. ahseb u ara l-internazzjonali.
Mary Mizzi
Jan 18th 2011, 08:47
u ma tarax.......
go for station sharing for MFA matches and abolish TV licence as inyour party's electoral promise if you want saome credibility Mr C.C. D. Agius
Alberto Mollicone
Jan 18th 2011, 08:36
Hon. Agius makes his voice heard on this issue ... every now and then. Is he interested is using this to divert attention from other serious issues which concern the country. Yet again he seems to be barking at the wrong tree, what are the Malta Communications Authority and the Office for Fair Competition doing on this? However agreeing with M. Curmi below, the question is more then legitimate, why is Hon. Agius (not to mention the extensive interest given by the Social Affairs Committee way back in summer and now seems to have died down) interested in redressing the issue just now. The prevailing situation has been with us for at least 5 years, any third party interest?
On this issue however one is curious to know what was the outcome of the investigation done by the Department of Consumer Affairs on the question of unilateral removal of the Living and Comedy Channel. This investigation was announced through a press conference by Hon. Chris Said on the 29th December 2010 and had to be concluded within a "few days". May we, as consumers, ask what was the outcome? Can a report be published?
A. Mifsud
Jan 18th 2011, 08:34
Forced to share??!!! on what grounds?
M.Curmi
Jan 18th 2011, 08:21
why now?
Why wasn't this same initiative taken when Melita had a complete monopoly on any football league?
A. Zahra
Jan 18th 2011, 15:21
when melita there was alone nobody the Government could force it to share with! Simple my dear Watson!
M.Curmi
Jan 20th 2011, 13:18
@ A.Zahra
Can you please specify what happened during the last 5/6 years when GO was offering a TV service (and prior to that Multiplus)?
during this time nobody ever raised a finger to protect GO customers, who like Melita's enjoy watching football matches!!
Mary Mizzi
Jan 18th 2011, 08:02
Why come out now and not when Melita had the monopoly?
Maybe you can whip your party into abolishing the National TV licence - aGonzipn electoral promise since at the end of the day we are also paying to get the National station and other Maltese TV stations.
Joe Borg
Jan 18th 2011, 07:57
Only interested in football???
and what about the other stations which where denied to us recently like UK living?